Is the European Union in Crisis? The Relationship between EU Citizenship and Direct Democracy and Its Impact on Democratic Legitimacy
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.2298/FID240327003KKeywords:
European Union citizenship, right to vote, democratic legitimacy, direct democracy, referendum, European citizens’ initiativeAbstract
The crisis situation caused by pandemic COVID-19 and the effects of the war between Russia and Ukraine are also affecting the functioning of the European Union. From time to time, voices are raised questioning the existence of democratic legitimacy in the European Union. It is therefore important to examine how the concept of EU citizenship relates to the concept of right to vote, in particular, direct democracy. The institutions of direct democracy, and in particular, referendums, are the most general and most powerful form of direct exercise of power, since they enable the people themselves to decide on a matter directly. When looking at the system in the EU Member States, it is worth examining the issue of referendums at national and local level, in particular the importance of the concept of EU citizenship in determining the voters who participate in the referendum. In this context, it could be asked as a preliminary question whether it would be possible to introduce an EU referendum in which EU citizens could decide on an issue falling within the EU’s competence, or whether, similarly, a cross-border regional referendum could be envisaged in which EU citizens living in several countries could decide on a regional issue affecting several countries. It is also necessary, however, to examine an institution that is already in operation: the past, present and future of the European Citizens’ Initiative, with a view to whether it could become a kind of European referendum in the future
References
Aloisio, Salvatore, et al. 2011. „The European Citizens’ Initiative: Challenges and Perspectives.” In: Matarazzo, Raffaello, ed. Democracy in the EU after the Lisbon Treaty. Rome: Istituto Affari Internazionali (IAI), pp.: 65–150.
Beckman, Ludvig. 2009. The Frontiers of Democracy – The Right to Vote and its Limits. Chippenham and Eastbourne: CPI Antony Rowe.
Bódi, Stefánia. 2018. „Petíciós jog.” URL: https://ijoten.hu/uploads/peticios-jog.pdf (last accessed: February 11, 2025).
Crombez, Christophe. 1997. „The Co-Decision Procedure in the European Union.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 22 (1): 97–119.
Csink, Lóránt. 2020. „Népszavazás és európai polgári kezdeményezés.” In: Csink, Lóránt, Attila Gulyás, Gábor Kurunczi, and Ádám Varga, eds. Alkotmányjog, Budapest: Novissima, pp.: 117–124.
______. 2021. „Közvetlen demokrácia.” In: Csink, Lóránt, Balázs Schanda, and László Trócsányi, eds. Bevezetés az alkotmányjogba – Az Alaptörvény és Magyarország alkotmányos intézményei, Budapest: HVG Orac, pp.: 139–152.
Cygan, Adam, and Erika Szyszczak. 2006. „EU Citizenship.” The International and Comparative Law Quarterly 55 (4): 977–982.
Kilberg, Andrew G. I. 2014. „We the people: The original meaning of popular sovereignty.” Virginia Law Review 100 (5): 1061–1109.
Kiss, Mónika Dorota. 2009. „A közhatalom közvetlensége.” In: Kocsis, Miklós, and Judit Zeller, eds. A köztársasági alkotmány 20 éve. Pécs: PAMA, pp.: 527–543.
Kochenov, Dimitry, 2009. „Ius Tractum of Many Faces: European Citizenship and the Difficult Relationship between Status and Rights.” Columbia Journal of European Law 15 (2): 169–237.
Kurunczi, Gábor. 2020. Az egyre általánosabb választójog kihívásai – Az általános és egyenlő választójog elvének elemzése a magyar szabályozás tükrében. Budapest: Pázmány Press.
______. 2023. „The Relationship between EU Citizenship and the Right to Vote.” In: Cristani, Frederica, and Cristina Elena Popa Tache, eds. Tempore Mutationis in International and Comparative Law. Bucharest-Paris-Calgary: ADJURIS, pp.: 93–112.
Longo, Erik. 2019. „The European Citizens’ initiative: too much democracy for EU polity?” German Law Journal 20 (1): 181–200.
Meyer, Antonia. 2017. „Grenzen des Unionsbürgerschaftlichen Wahlrechts in der Europäischen Union?” Freilaw 11 (1): 1–6.
Ophuls, William. 1997. „Requiem for Representative Lóránt Democracy.” The Good Society 7 (1): 6–10.
Petrescu, Oana. 2014. „The European Citizens’ Initiative: A useful instrument for society and for citizens?” Revista Chilena de Derecho 41 (3): 993–1015.
Qvortrup, Mads. 1999. „A.V. Decey: The referendum as the people’s veto.” History of Political Thought 20 (3): 531–546.
Rakauskas, Raivydas. 2002. „Using referendums in decision-making on the European Union: what is in it for Lithuania?” URL: https://www.tspmi.vu.lt/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/ES-vie%C5%A1osios-politikos-trumpra%C5%A1tis-R.-Rakauskas.pdf (last accessed: February 11, 2025).
Ridard, Basile. 2018. The European Citizens’ Initiative, A sufficient tool to bring Europe closer to its citizens? Brussels: Egmont Papers.
Rose, Richard. 2018. „Referendum challenges to the EU’s policy legitimacy –and how the EU responds.” Journal of European Public Policy 26 (2): 207–225.
Schulz, Heiner, and Thomas Konig. 2000. „Institutional Reform and Decision-Making Efficiency in the European Union.” American Journal of Political Science 44 (4): 653–666.
Szabó, Marcel. 2021. „Az Európai Unió intézményrendszere.” In: Szabó, Marcel, Laura Gyeney, Petra Lea Láncos, and András Pünkösty, eds. Az Európai Unió jogának alapjai, Budapest: Pázmány Press, pp.: 175–251.
Tárnok, Balázs. 2020. „Az európai polgári kezdeményezés működési nehézségei és az európai polgári kezdeményezésről szóló rendelet felülvizsgálata.” Iustum Aequum Salutare 16 (2): 147–178.
______. 2021. „Nemzeti régiók – a hetedik sikeres európai polgári kezdeményezés.” URL: https://eustrat.uni-nke.hu/hirek/2021/11/15/nemzeti-regiok-a-hetedik-sikeres-europai-polgari-kezdemenyezes (last accessed: February 11, 2025).
_______. 2022. „Tíz éves az európai polgári kezdeményezés.” URL: https://eustrat.uni-nke.hu/hirek/2022/03/30/tiz-eves-az-europai-polgari-kezdemenyezes (last accessed: February 11, 2025).
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Articles published in Philosophy and Society are open-access in accordance with the CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 License.