Living Institutions, Violence, and Communal Forms of Life: Towards a Marxist Social Ontology
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.2298/FID2603605SKeywords:
living institution, habits, violence, inorganic nature, non-Western societyAbstract
This article re-examines Marx and Engels’s conceptualizations of what constitutes a “living institution.” The concept of living institutions transcends the conventional state–civil society binary, revealing plural anthropological practices that are simultaneously emancipatory and normative. I trace the various manifestations of the “living institution” throughout the development of Marx’s thought, from his early polemics against the historical school of law to the mature expressions of historical materialism. In the latter, Marx theorizes the ambivalence of violence, viewing it either as a manifestation of social vitality and transformation or as the “inorganic naturalization” of society in the service of social reproduction. Historical materialism implies that a new institutional imagination can only take root through the re-institutionalization of existing, concrete institutions. This imperative ultimately leads Marx in his later years to engage deeply with anthropology, ethnology, and non-Western societies. Specific forms of communal life, as Marx recognized, often outlive their own era, possessing an “afterlife” (Nachleben) that introduces heterogeneous and plural temporalities into contemporary society.
References
Abensour, Miguel. 2011. Democracy Against the State: Marx and the Machiavellian Moment. Trans. Max Blechman and Martin Breaugh. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Anderson, Kevin. 2016. Marx at the Margins: On Nationalism, Ethnicity, and Non Western Societies. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
______. 2025. The Late Marx’s Revolutionary Roads: Colonialism, Gender, and Indigenous Communism. London: Verso.
Balibar, Étienne. 2019. “Revisiting the ‘Expropriation of Expropriators’ in Marx’s Capital.” In: Musto, Marcello, ed. Marx’s Capital after 150 Years. Abingdon: Routledge: pp.: 39–53.
______. 2020. “From Violence as Anti-Politics to Politics as Anti-Violence.” Critical Times 3 (3): 384–399.
Benjamin, Walter, and Asja Lacis. 1991. “Neapel.” In: Rexroth, Tillman, ed. Gesammelte Schriften IV.I. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp: pp.: 307–316.
Bojanić, Petar. 2022. In-Statuere: Figures of Institutional Building. Trans. E. Djordjevic. Frankfurt/M: Vittorio Klostermann GmbH.
Breckman, Warren. 2001. “Eduard Gans and the Crisis of Hegelianism.” Journal of the History of Ideas 62 (3): 543–564.
Butler, Judith. 2019. “The Inorganic Body in the Early Marx.” Radical Philosophy 2 (6): 1–17.
Chaput, Emmanuel. 2025. “Hegel’s Concept of Inorganic Nature as Umwelt.” In: Garcia, Lorenzo F., ed. The Concept of Nature in Classical German Philosophy. Berlin: De Gruyter: pp.: 183–208.
Dunayevskaya, Raya. 1982. Rosa Luxemburg, Women’s Liberation, and Marx’s Philosophy of Revolution. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.
Esposito, Roberto. 2022. Institution. Trans. Z. Hanafi. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Feuerbach, Ludwig. 2008. The Essence of Christianity. Trans. George Eliot. Walnut, CA: MSAC Philosophy Group.
Fischbach, Franck. 2006. “Activity, Passivity, Alienation: A Reading of the Economic and Philosophic Manuscripts of 1844.” Actuel Marx 39 (1): 13–27.
Gans, Eduard. 2005. Naturrecht und Universalrechtsgeschichte. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.
Hegel, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich. 2018. Phenomenology of Spirit. Trans. Terry Pinkard. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hess, Moses. 1962. “Philosophie der Akt.” In: Ausgewählte Schriften. Köln: Joseph Melzer Verlag: pp.: 131–147.
Kelley, Donald R. 1978. “The Metaphysics of Law: An Essay on the Very Young Marx.” American Historical Review 83 (2): 350–367.
Khurana, Thomas. 2022. “Gattungswesen: Zur Sozialität der menschlichen Lebensform.” Deutsche Zeitschrift für Philosophie 70 (3): 373–399.
Löwith, Karl. 1964. From Hegel to Nietzsche: The Revolution in Nineteenth-Century Thought. Trans. David E. Green. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
Maine, Henry Sumner. 1880. Lectures on the Early History of Institutions. London: John Murray.
Malabou, Catherine. 2004. The Future of Hegel: Plasticity, Temporality, and Dialectic. London: Routledge.
Marx, Karl. 1974. The Ethnological Notebooks of Karl Marx. Ed. Lawrence Krader. Assen: Van Gorcum.
______. 2023/2024. “MEGA IV/27: Frühgeschichte, Gemeindelandbesitz, Ethnologie (1879-1882).” URL: https://megadigital.bbaw.de/exzerpte/detail.xql?id=M4847009&ref=M0007752&sec=7#18 (last accessed: August 28, 2025).
Mauss, Marcel. 2005. On the Nature of Sociology. Trans. Mike Gane. New York, NY: Durkheim Press.
Merleau-Ponty, Maurice. 2010. Institution and Passivity: Course Notes from the Collège de France (1954-1955). Trans. Leonard Lawlor and Heath Massey. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.
Mittelmeier, Martin. 2013. Adorno in Neapel: Wie sich eine Sehnsuchtslandschaft in Philosophie verwandelt. Munich: Siedler Verlag.
Morfino, Vittorio. 2013. “Democracy, Imagination, Revolution: Marx, Reader of Spinoza.” Graduate Faculty Philosophy Journal 34 (1): 89–112.
Rancière, Jacques. 2019. Marx in the Woods: The Dialectic of Reason and Private Interest. Trans. J. Palmusaari. Helsinki: Rab-Rab Press.
Saar, Martin. 2013. Die Immanenz der Macht: Politische Theorie nach Spinoza. Berlin: Suhrkamp.
Savigny, Friedrich Carl von. 1999. Of the Vocation of Our Age for Legislation and Jurisprudence. Trans. A. Hayward. London: Kitchener.
Seyfert, Robert. 2011. Das Leben der Institutionen: Zu einer allgemeinen Theorie der Institutionalisierung Weilerswist: Velbrück Wissenschaft.
Spanò, Michele. 2019. “Making the Multiple: Toward a Trans-Subjective Private Law.” South Atlantic Quarterly 118 (4): 839–855.
Tomba, Massimiliano. 2017. “Layers of Time in Marx: From the Grundrisse to Capital to the Russian Commune.” In: Morfino, Vittorio, and Peter D. Thomas, eds. The Government of Time: Theories of Plural Temporality in the Marxist Tradition. Leiden: Brill: pp.: 58–77.
Waszek, Norbert. 2015. “War Eduard Gans (1797-1839) der erste Links- oder Junghegelianer?” In: Quante, Michael, and Amir Mohseni, eds. Die linken Hegelianer: Studien zum Verhältnis von Religion und Politik im Vormärz. Paderborn: Wilhelm Fink: pp.: 29–51.
Xiao, Ying. 2015. “From ‘State and Society’ to ‘Institutions and Life’: A Shift in the Study of Social Change in China.” Social Sciences in China 36 (4): 76–90.
Zammito, John H. 2023. “Schelling and Von der Weltseele.” In: Corti, Luca, and Johannes-Georg Schülein, eds. Nature and Naturalism in Classical German Philosophy. New York, NY: Routledge: pp.: 148–162.
Žižek, Slavoj. 2009. “Discipline between Two Freedoms - Madness and Habit in German Idealism.” In: Gabriel, Markus, and Slavoj Žižek. Mythology, Madness, and Laughter: Subjectivity in German Idealism. New York, NY: Continuum: pp.: 95–121.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Articles published in Philosophy and Society are open-access in accordance with the CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 License.