Parents’ Metaphorical Perception of Toys and Their Views on Play

Emine Yılmaz Bolat; Merve Koyuncu; Miloš Agatonović

doi:10.2298/FID2603585K

Autori

Emine Yılmaz Bolat Mersin University
Merve Koyuncu Toros University
Miloš Agatonović The Academy of Applied Preschool Teaching and Health Studies

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.2298/FID2603585K

Apstrakt

This article explores how parents of preschool-aged children in Türkiye make sense of “toys” through metaphor and how these meanings shape views of play and toy selection. Drawing on a qualitative phenomenological design, we conducted semi-structured interviews with 25 parents. Metaphor analysis was used to map recurring figurative constructions of toys, and descriptive thematic analysis was used to examine parents’ accounts of play and purchasing criteria. Parents’ metaphors clustered around three interpretive registers: toys as companions (affective and relational support), as developmental instruments (learning and futureoriented investment), and as commodities (objects evaluated through safety, durability, and price). The dominance of the “friend” metaphor foregrounds toys’ role in children’s everyday emotional life, while the investment and commodity frames reveal how developmental ideals and economic constraints co-produce parental decision-making. By connecting everyday parental talk to wider questions about the social organization of childhood, consumption, and the governance of “good” parenting, the study offers implications for early childhood education, family guidance, and policy.

Reference

Adak Özdemir, Atiye, and Oya Ramazan. 2012. “Oyuncağa Çocuk, Anne ve Öğretmen Bakış Açısı.” Eğitim Bilimleri Araştırmaları Dergisi 2 (1): 1–16.

Beck, Ulrich. 1992. Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity. London: Sage.

Braun, Virginia, and Victoria Clarke. 2006. “Using Thematic Analysis in Psychology.” Qualitative Research in Psychology 3 (2): 77–101.

Frost, Joe L., Sue C. Wortham, and Stuart C. Reifel. 2012. Play and Child Development. 4th ed. New York: Pearson.

Ginsburg, Kenneth R. 2007. “The Importance of Play in Promoting Healthy Child Development and Maintaining Strong Parent-Child Bonds.” Pediatrics 119 (1): 182–191.

Giren, Songül, and Emre Durak. 2015. “Okulöncesi Öğretmenlerinin Oyuncak Kavramına İlişkin Metaforik Algıları.” Bartın Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi 4 (2): 561–575.

Hays, Sharon. 1996. The Cultural Contradictions of Motherhood. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

Heidemann, Sandra, and Deborah Hewitt. 2009. Play: The Pathway from Theory to Practice. 2nd ed. St. Paul, MN: Redleaf Press.

Kollmayer, Marlene et al. 2018. “Parents’ Judgments about the Desirability of Toys for Their Children: Associations with Gender Role Attitudes, Gender-typing of Toys, and Demographics.” Sex Roles 79 (5-6): 329–341.

Kumari, Pragati et al. 2025. “What Drives Parents’ Choices in Toy Selection for Their Children?” International Journal of Contemporary Pediatrics 12 (5): 805–817.

Lakoff, George, and Mark Johnson. 1980. Metaphors We Live By. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Lareau, Annette. 2003. Unequal Childhoods: Class, Race, and Family Life. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

Marsh, Jackie et al. 2016. “Digital Play: A New Classification.” Early Years 36 (3): 242–253.

Miles, Matthew B., and A. Michael Huberman. 1994. Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

Pellegrini, Anthony D., and Peter K. Smith. 1998. “The Development of Play During Childhood: Forms and Possible Functions.” Child Psychology and Psychiatry Review 3 (2): 51–57.

Piaget, Jean. 1962. Play, Dreams and Imitation in Childhood. Translated by C. Gattegno and F. M. Hodgson. New York: W. W. Norton.

Polat, Büşra, and Mustafa Kara. 2023. “Oyuncak ve Oyun Oynamanın Çocuk Gelişimine Etkisi.” Kastamonu Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Fakültesi Dergisi 2 (1): 1–10.

Richards, Melissa N., Diane L. Putnick, and Marc H. Bornstein. 2020. “Toy Buying Today: Considerations, Information Seeking, and Thoughts about Manufacturer Suggested Age.” Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology 68: 101134.

Saban, Ahmet. 2009. “Öğretmen Adaylarının Öğrenci Kavramına İlişkin Sahip Oldukları Zihinsel İmgeler.” Türk Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi 7 (2): 281–326.

Sarıkaya, Nilgün, and Gözde Kaya. 2022. “Ebeveynlerin Oyuncak Seçimine Yönelik Tutum, Algı ve Davranışlarına Yönelik Bir Araştırma.” EUropean Journal of Managerial Research (EUJMR) 6 (10): 1–14. URL: https://izlik.org/JA22SH57JC (last accessed: September 11, 2026).

Semiz, Marina. 2022. “Toys as Artifacts of the Material Culture of Children and Childhood: Implications for Future Research.” Teme – Časopis za Društvene Nauke 46 (2): 399–416.

Shaffer, David R. 2009. Developmental Psychology: Childhood and Adolescence. 8th ed. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.

Singer, Dorothy G., and Jerome L. Singer. 2005. Imagination and Play in the Electronic Age. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Sutton-Smith, Brian. 1986. Toys as Culture. New York: Gardner Press.

Vygotsky, Lev S. 1978. Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Yıldırım, Ali, and Hasan Şimşek. 2013. Sosyal Bilimlerde Nitel Araştırma Yöntemleri. Ankara: Seçkin Yayıncılık.