Historical A Priori and the Quasi-Transcendental: Mapping the Complexity of What Is Unfolding
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.2298/FID2603407CKljučne reči:
historical a priori, quasi-transcendental, phenomenology , transcendental philosophy, critiqueApstrakt
The introduction situates the special issue within contemporary debates on the transformation of transcendental philosophy, by examining the historical a priori and the quasi-transcendental as two related attempts to rethink the transcendental question under conditions of historicity. It begins by outlining the problem of how transcendental conditions of possibility can be understood once they are recognized as historically constituted, socially mediated, and open to transformation. It then ex-amines the notion of the historical a priori through the relation between Husserl and Foucault, focusing on their different accounts of historicity, subjectivity, validity, and critique. The following section turns to the quasi-transcendental, particularly in Derrida and its contemporary phenomenological reception, presenting it as a related attempt to rethink constitutive conditions without setting them as timeless foundations. The authors subsequently consider the implications of both notions for questions of history, normativity, critique, and freedom, arguing that they illuminate the tension between constitutive force and historical contingency. In this context, critique is understood as an interrogation of historically sedimented conditions that shape experience without ever fully determining it, while freedom is conceived as the possibility of reflecting upon and transforming these very structures. Finally, the editors introduce the contributions to the special issue, highlighting the different ways in which they address the relation between transcendental inquiry and historicity.
Reference
Goris, Wouter. 2012. “Das historische Apriori bei Husserl und Foucault: Zur philosophischen Relevanz eines Leitbegriffs der historischen Epistemologie.” Quaestio 12: 291–342. https://doi.org/10.1484/J.QUAESTIO.1.103619.
Aldea, Andreea Smaranda, and Amy Allen. 2016. “History, Critique, and Freedom: The Historical A Priori in Husserl and Foucault.” Continental Philosophy Review 49 (1): 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11007-015-9359-8.
Foucault, Michel. 1969. L’archéologie du savoir. Paris: Gallimard.
Hurst, Andrea. 2025. “Quasi-Transcendental, as a Concept in Phenomenology.” In: De Warren, Nicolas and Ted Toadvine, eds. Encyclopedia of Phenomenology. Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-47253-5_204-1. (Published online 2024; encyclopedia edition 2025.)
Guenther, Lisa. 2021. “Six Senses of Critique for Critical Phenomenology.” Puncta: Journal of Critical Phenomenology 4 (2): 5–23. https://doi.org/10.5399/PJCP.V4I2.2.
Husserl, Edmund. 1989. Ideas Pertaining to a Pure Phenomenology and to a Phenomenological Philosophy. Second Book: Studies in the Phenomenology of Constitution. Translated by Richard Rojcewicz and André Schuwer. Collected Works III. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Rorty, Richard. 1995. “Is Derrida a ‘Quasi’-Transcendental Philosopher?” Contemporary Literature 36 (2): 173–200.
##submission.downloads##
Objavljeno
Broj časopisa
Rubrika
Licenca
Sva prava zadržana (c) 2026 Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society

Ovaj rad je pod Creative Commons Aуторство-Nekomercijalno-Bez prerade 4.0 Internacionalna licenca.
Articles published in Philosophy and Society are open-access in accordance with the CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 License.