Democracy Before the Court: Democracy as a Justiciable Concept in the EU

Gerard Conway

doi:10.2298/FID2502357C

Autori

Gerard Conway Brunel University of London

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.2298/FID2502357C

Ključne reči:

democracy, justiciability, Court of Justice, human rights, rule of law, values, conflict of norms, conflict of values

Apstrakt

Democracy is a justiciable concept under EU law. Beyond identifying the EU as being a representative democracy, the EU treaties provide relatively little guidance of what democracy entails. The context is the contestedness of the concept of democracy, especially across 27 polities of the Member States of the EU, and the potentially extensive review of national constitutional orders that could result from the jurisdiction of the Court of Justice of the EU regarding Article 2 TEU (Treaty on European Union) as a statement of foundational values of the EU. This paper considers, in particular, how the concept of democracy interacts with the other values in Article 2, principally, the rule of law and respect for human rights. The jurisdiction of the Court of Justice under Article 2 highlights the problem of determining the relative importance and interaction of the fundamental values of the EU given their relative incommensurability, including the problems of i. relating democracy at national and supranational levels in the EU and of ii. the limits of democratic authority. It is argued that Article 2 should be understood as presenting a complex problem of the inter-relationship of values for which a method of reflective equilibrium and a threshold test are essential for their application as justiciable concepts. Applying this framework or approach, the final part considers some examples of national practices relating to democracy that could be considered contrary to the values of democracy in EU law and subject to jurisdiction under Articles 2 and 7 TEU: the lengthening of parliamentary terms, recall procedures, and militant democracy.

Reference

Primary Sources

Case C-502/19 Junqueras Vies [2019] EU:C:2019:1115

Case C-157/21, Poland v. Parliament and Council [2022] ECLI:EU:C:2022:98 Constitution of France, Article 6

Electoral Act 1976, OJ L 278 8.10.1976, p. 5

European Commission, Proposal for a Regulation of the European parliament and the Council on the protection of the Union’s budget in case of generalised deficiencies as regards the rule of law in the Member States, Brussels, 2.5.2018 COM(2018) 324 final 2018/0136 (COD), Article 2

Explanations accompanying the Charter of Fundamental Rights, OJ C 303, 14.12.2007, p. 17

France, Loi constitutionnelle no 2000-964 du 2 Octobre 2000

Handyside v. United Kingdom, Merits, App No 5493/72, A/24, [1976] ECHR 5, (1976) 1 EHRR 737

Joined Cases C-404/15 and C-659/15 PPU, Aranyosi and Căldăraru [2016] ECLI:EU:C:2016:198

Purcell & Ors v. Ireland [1991] ECHR 77 UK Parliament Act 1911

Secondary Sources

Aarnio, Aulis, and Aleksander Peczenik. 1996. “On Values. Universal or Relative?” Ratio Juris 9: 321–330.

Alexy, Robert. 1985. A Theory of Constitutional Rights. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Beck, Gunnar. 2008. “The Mythology of Rights.” Ratio Juris 21 (3): 312–347.

Benvenisti, Eyal. 1999. “Margin of appreciation, consensus, and universal standards.” New York University Journal of International Law and Politics 31 (4): 843–854.

Besselink, Leonard. 2017. “The Bite, the Bark and the Howl: Article 7 TEU and the Rule of Law Initiatives”. In: Kochenov, Dimitry, and András Jakab, eds. The Enforcement of EU Law and Values: Ensuring Member States’ Compliance. Oxford: Oxford University Press: pp.: 128–144.

Bhanu, Vinod. 2007. “Recall of Parliamentarians: A Prospective Accountability.” Economic and Political Weekly 42 (52): 20–23.

Böckenförde, Ernst-Wolfgang. 2020. Religion, Law, and Democracy. Selected Writings (edited by Mirjam Künkler and Tine Stein), Volume II. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Bobbio, Noberto. 1955. “Della libertà dei moderni comparata a quella dei posteri.” In: Politica e Cultura. Torino: Einaudi.

Brems, Eva. 1996. “The margin of appreciation doctrine in the case-law of the European court of human rights.” Heidelberg Journal of International Law 56: 230–314.

Carozza, Paolo G. 1998. “Uses and Misuses of Comparative Law in International Human Rights: Some Reflections on the Jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights.” Notre Dame L. Rev. 73: 1217–1238.

Chambers, Simone. 2021. “Proceduralising the People: Deliberative Democracy, Majority Rule and the Rule of Law.” In: Amato, Giuliano, Benedetta Barbisan, and Cesare Pinelli, eds. Rule of Law vs Majoritarian Democracy. Oxford: Hart Publishing: pp.: 103–120.

Christiano, Thomas. 2008. The Constitution of Equality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Cohen, Joshua. 1989. “Deliberation and Democratic Legitimacy.” In: Hamlin, Alan, and Philip Pettit, eds. The Good Polity: Normative Analysis of the State. New York: Blackwell: pp.: 17–34.

Collier, David, Fernando Daniel Hidalgo, and Andra Olivia Maciuceanu. 2006. “Essentially Contested Concepts: Debates and Applications.” Journal of Political Ideologies 11 (3): 211–246.

Conway, Gerard. 2002. “Breaches of EC Law and the International Responsibility of Member States.” European Journal of International Law 13: 679–695.

______. 2012. The Limits of Legal Reasoning and the European Court of Justice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Crisp, Leslie. 1978. The Australian Federal Labour Party 1901-1951. 2nd ed. Sydney: Hale & Iremonger.

Daniels, Norman. 1979. “Wide Reflective Equilibrium and Theory Acceptance in Ethics.” Journal of Philosophy 76 (5): 256–282.

Dothan, Shai. 2018. “Margin of Appreciation and Democracy: Human Rights and Deference to Political Bodies.” Journal of International Dispute Settlement 9: 145–153. (‘Dothan 2018a’)

______. 2018. “Judicial Deference Allows European Consensus to Emerge.” Chicago Journal of International Law 18 (2): 393–419. (‘Dothan 2018b’)

Ely, John Hart. 1980. Democracy and Distrust. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

Estlund, David. 2008. Democratic Authority: A Philosophical Framework. Princeton NJ: Princeton University Press.

Fiss, Owen. 1982. “Objectivity and Interpretation.” Stanford Law Review 34 (4): 739–763.

Follesdal, Andreas. 2017. “Theories of Human Rights: Political or Orthodox - why it matters.” In: Maliks, Reidar, and Johan S. Karlsson, eds. Moral and Political Conceptions of Human Rights: Implications for Theory and Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Frändberg, Åke. 2018. The Legal Order: Studies in the Foundations of Juridical Thinking. Cham: Springer.

Gallie, Walter Bryce. 1956. “Essentially Contested Concepts.” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 56: 167–198.

Giba, Márian, and Vicent Bujňák. 2021. “Referendum on early elections: The case of Slovakia in the European context.” European Studies 18 (1): 39–66.

Gray, John N. 1977. “On the Contestability of Social and Political Concepts.” Political Theory 5: 331–349.

Gutmann, Amy, and Dennis Thompson. 1998. Democracy and Disagreement. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

______. 2002. “Deliberative Democracy Beyond Process.” Journal of Political Philosophy 10 (2): 153–174.

Habermas, Jürgen. 1995. “On the Internal Relation Between the Rule of Law and Democracy.” European Journal of Philosophy 3 (1): 12–20.

______. 2006. “On the Internal Relation between the Rule of Law and Democracy”. In Constitutionalism and Democracy. London: Routledge: pp.: 253–264.

Hadden, Tom. 2000. “The pendulum theory of individual, communal and minority rights.” Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 3 (1): 77–90.

Held, David. 2006. Models of Democracy. 3rd ed. Cambridge: Polity Press.

Huscroft, Grant, Bradley Miller, and Grégoire Webber, eds. 2014. Proportionality and the Rule of Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Kelly, Richard, and Neil Johnston. 2024. Recall Elections (House of Commons Library Number CBP5089).

Kelsen, Hans. 1955. “Foundations of Democracy.” Ethics 66 (1) (2): 1–101.

Kutay, Acar. 2015. “Limits of Participatory Democracy in European Governance.” European Law Journal 21 (6): 803–818.

Kyrgier, Martin. 2021. “Democracy and the Rule of Law.” In: Meierhenrich, Jens, and Martin Loughlin, eds. The Cambridge Companion to the Rule of Law.

Landwehr, Claudia, and Armin Schäfer. 2023. “The Promise of Representative Democracy: Deliberative Responsiveness.” Res Publica, online first.

Larik, Joris. 2014. “From Speciality to a Constitutional Sense of Purpose: On the Changing Role of the Objectives of the European Union.” International and Comparative Law Quarterly 63 (4): 935–962.

Lasser, Mitchel. 2003. “Anticipating Three Models of Judicial Control, Debate and Legitimacy: The European Court of Justice, the Cour de Cassation and the United States Supreme Court.” Jean Monnet Working Paper 1/03: 1–56.

Leloup, Mathieu. 2023. “The Untapped Potential of the Systemic Criterion in the ECJ’s Case Law on Judicial Independence.” German Law Journal 24: 995–1010.

Letsas, George. 2006. “Two Concepts of Marin of Appreciation.” Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 26 (4): 705–732.

Lijphart, Arend. 1979. “Consociation and Federation: Conceptual and Empirical Links.” Canadian Journal of Political Science/Revue canadienne de science politique 12 (3): 499–515.

Loewenstein, Karl. 1937. “Militant Democracy and Fundamental Rights, I.” American Political Science Review 31 (3): 417–432.

______. 1937. “Militant Democracy and Fundamental Rights, II.” American Political Science Review 31 (4): 638–658.

Lovett, Frank. 2004. “Can Justice Be Based on Consent?” The Journal of Political Philosophy 12 (1): 79–101.

Malinov, Svetoslav. 2021. “The democratic deficit of the EU: Breaking the spell of a false analogy.” European View 20 (2): 226 –233.

Mangiameli, Stelio. 2014. “Article 2 [The Homogeneity Clause].” In: Blanke, Herman, and Stelio Mangiameli, eds. The Treaty on European Union (TEU): A Commentary. Heidelberg: Springer.

Möller, Kai. 2012. “Proportionality: Challenging the critics.” International Journal of Constitutional Law 10 (3): 709–731.

Moreso, J.J., and C. Valentini. 2021. “In the Region of Middle Axioms: Judicial Dialogue as Wide Reflective Equilibrium and Mid-Level Principles.” Law and Philosophy 40: 545–583.

Moravscik, Andrew. 2002. “In Defence of the Democratic Deficit: Re-assessing Legitimacy in the European Union.” Journal of Common Market Studies 40 (4): 603–624.

Nyirkos, Tamas. 2018. The Tyranny of the Majority: History, Concepts, and Challenges. New York: Routledge.

Pettit, Philip. 2001. “Deliberative Democracy and the Discursive Dilemma.” Philosophical Issues 11 (1): 268–299.

Pitkin, Hannah. 1967. The Concept of Representation. Berkeley: The University of California Press.

Plotke, David. 1997. “Representation is Democracy.” Constellations 4 (1): 19–34.

Ragazzoni, David. 2022. “Equality, liberty, justice: Bobbio’s democratic vision, between liberalism and socialism.” Journal of Political Ideologies 27(3): 270–290.

Rawls, John. 1974-1975. “The Independence of Moral Theory.” Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association 48: 5–22.

______. 2010, c1971. A Theory of Justice. New Delhi: Universal Law Publishing Co.

Rechnitzer, Tanja. 2022. Applying Reflective Equilibrium: Towards the Justification of a Precautionary Principle. Cham: Springer.

Sadurski, Wojciech. 2021. “Majority Rule, Democracy and Populism: Theoretical Considerations.” In: Amato, Giuliano, Benedetta Barbisan, and Cesare Pinelli, eds. Rule of Law vs Majoritarian Democracy. Oxford: Hart Publishing: pp.: 189–198.

Saffon, Maria Paula, and Nadia Urbinati. 2013. “Procedural Democracy, the Bulwark of Equal Liberty.” Political Theory 41 (3): 441–481.

Scharpf, Fritz W. 1999. Governing in Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Scheppele, Kim Lane. “What can the European Commission do when Member States violate basic Principles of the European Union? The Case for Systemic Infringement Actions.” Verfblog (Nov. 2013), https://verfassungsblog.de/wp-content/uploads/2013/11/scheppele-systemic-infringement-action-brussels-version.pdf (last accessed 18th June 2024).

Schima, Bernhard. 2019. “Article 269 TFEU.” In: Kellerbauer, Manuel, and Jonathan Tomkin, eds. The EU Treaties and the Charter of Fundamental Rights. Oxford: Oxford University Press: pp.: 1846–1847.

Schumpeter, Joseph. 1976. Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy. London: Allen & Unwin.

Simma, Bruno, and Dirk Pulkowski. 2006. “Of Planets and The Universe: Self- contained Regimes in International Law.” European Journal of International Law 17 (3): 483–529.

Spieker, Luke Dimitrios. 2019. “Breathing Life into the Union’s Common Values: On the Judicial Application of Article 2 TEU in the EU Value Crisis.” German Law Journal 20: 1182–1213.

______. 2023. EU Values before the Court of Justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Macdonald, Ronald St. John. 1993. “The Margin of Appreciation”. In: Macdonald, Ronald St., Franz Matscher and Herbert Petzold, eds. The European System for the Protection of Human Rights. Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff.

Sunstein, Cass R. 1994. “Incommensurability and Valuation in Law.” Michigan Law Review 92 (4): 779–861.

Swanton, Christine. 1986. “On the ‘Essential Contestedness’ of Political Concepts.” Ethics 95 (4): 811–827.

Tamanaha, Brian. 2004. On the Rule of Law: History, Politics, Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Tridimas, Takis, and Giulia Gentile. 2019. “The Essence of Rights: An Unreliable Boundary?” German Law Journal 20 (6): 794–816.

Tripkovic, Bosco. 2022. “A New Philosophy for the Margin of Appreciation and European Consensus.” Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 42 (1): 207–234.

Twomey, Anne. 2011. “The Recall of Members of Parliament and Citizens’ Initiated Elections.” UNSW Law Journal 34 (1): 41–69.

Venice Commission for Democracy through Law. 2009. Report on the Imperative Mandate and Similar Practices. Adopted by the Venice Commission at its 79th Plenary Session (Venice, 12-13 June 2009).

Viehoff, Daniel. 2014. “Democratic Equality and Political Authority.” Philosophy & Public Affairs 42 (2): 337–375.

Von Bogdandy, Armin. 2020. “Principles of a Systemic Deficiencies Doctrine: How to Protect Checks and Balances in the Member States.” Common Market Law Review 57: 705–740.

Weiler, Joseph. 1995. “Does Europe Need a Constitution? Demos, Telos and the German Maastricht Decision.” European Law Journal 1 (3): 219–258.