Reconstituting Différance as History through Derrida’s Reduction of Husserlian Phenomenology

Rebeca Pérez León

doi:10.2298/FID2603495P

Authors

Rebeca Pérez León School of Humanities and Education, Instituto Tecnológico y de Estudios Superiores de Monterrey

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.2298/FID2603495P

Keywords:

Différance, history, historical phenomenology, quasi-transcendental, reduction, Husserl

Abstract

This article advances three arguments. First, understanding Derrida’s différance and the qualification ‘quasi-transcendental’ requires retracing the path leading to Derrida’s historical methodological schema. Second, it is methodologically and historically necessary to begin this path with the reactivation of Husserl’s criticism and reduction of all forms of empiricism, including historicism. This reactivation grants phenomenology a structural role in Derrida’s philosophy and challenges historicist interpretations of Derrida’s work. Third, the irreducibility of writing at the core of phenomenology’s ultimate transcendental experience of phōnē reduces the tradition of metaphysics, distinguishing its inessential elements – presence in all its forms as absolute beginning and end of sense – from its essential elements – writing as the essential production of signification to infinity unrestricted by truth and objectivity. This irreducibility is quasi-transcendental because it makes the phenomenological edifice possible only as a symbolic representation representing nothing, but impossible as the fulfilment of the subject’s intention in an intuition.

References

Bennington, Geoffrey. 1988. “Deconstruction and the Philosophers (The Very Idea).” Oxford Literary Review 10 (1/2): 73–130.

Carr, David. 2016. “Husserl and Foucault on the Historical Apriori: Teleological and Anti-Teleological Views of History.” Continental Philosophy Review 49 (1): 127–137.

Derrida, Jacques. 2004. “The Double Session.” In: Dissemination. London: Continuum: pp.: 187–316.

______. 2003. “Phenomenology and the Closure of Metaphysics.” The New Yearbook for Phenomenology and Phenomenological Research, III: 103–120.

______. 2003a. The Problem of Genesis in Husserl’s Philosophy, translated by Marian Hobson. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

______. 2001a. “Violence and Metaphysics: An Essay on the Thought of Emmanuel Levinas.” In: Writing and Difference, translated by Alan Bass. London: Routledge: pp.: 97–192.

______. 2001b. “‘Genesis and Structure’ and Phenomenology.” In: Writing and Difference, translated by Alan Bass. London: Routledge: pp.: 193–211.

______. 2001d. “Structure, Sign, and Play in the Discourse of the Human Sciences.” In: Writing and Difference, translated by Alan Bass. London: Routledge: pp.: 351–370.

______. 2001e. “Open Discussion.” In: Patton, Paul, and Terry Smith, eds. Jacques Derrida. Deconstruction Engaged. The Sydney Seminars. Sydney: Power Publications: pp.: 105–120.

______. 1996. “Remarks on Deconstruction and Pragmatism.” In: Mouffe, Chantal, ed. Deconstruction and Pragmatism. London: Routledge: pp.: 79–90.

______. 1992. “‘This Strange Institution Called Literature’: An Interview with Jacques Derrida.” In: Attridge, Derek, ed. Acts of Literature. New York: Routledge: pp.: 33–75.

______. 1992a. “Force of Law: The ‘Mystical Foundation of Authority’.” In: Cornell, Drucilla, Michel Rosenfeld, and David Gray Carlson, eds. Deconstruction and the Possibility of Justice. New York: Routledge: pp.: 3–67.

______. 1989. Edmund Husserl’s Origin of Geometry: An Introduction, translated by John P. Leavey, Jr. Lincoln and London: University of Nebraska Press.

______. 1988a. “Signature, Event, Context.” In: Limited Inc. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press: pp.: 1–23.

______. 1988b. “Afterword: Toward an Ethic of Discussion.” In: Limited Inc. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press: pp.: 111–160.

______. 1982. “Différance.” In: Margins of Philosophy, translated by Alan Bass. Brighton: The Harvester Press: pp.: 1–27.

______. 1981. Positions, translated by Alan Bass. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

______. 1976. Of Grammatology, translated by Gayatri Chakravorty Spivak. Baltimore: The John Hopkins University Press.

______.1973. Speech and Phenomena. And Other Essays on Husserl’s Theory of Signs, translated by David. B Allison. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.

Dews, Peter. 1988. “Nietzsche and the Critique of Ursprungsphilosophie.” In: Krell, David Farrell, and David Wood, eds. Exceedingly Nietzsche. Aspects of Contemporary Nietzsche-Interpretation. London: Routledge: pp.: 164–176.

______. 1987. “Jacques Derrida: The Transcendental and Difference.” In: Logics of Disintegration. Post-structuralist Thought and the Claims of Critical Theory. London: Verso: pp.: 1–44.

Doyon, Maxime. 2014. “The Transcendental Claim of Deconstruction.” In Direk, Zeynep and Leonard Lawlor, eds. A Companion to Derrida. Chichester, UK: Wiley Blackwell: pp.: 132–149.

Gasché, Rodolphe. 1986. The Tain of the Mirror. Derrida and the Philosophy of Reflection. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Guenther, Lisa. 2021. “Six Senses of Critique for Critical Phenomenology.” Puncta. Journal of Critical Phenomenology 4 (2): 5–23.

Habermas, Jürgen. 1987. “VII Beyond the Temporalised Philosophy of Origins.

Jacques Derrida’s Critique of Phonocentrism.” In: The Philosophical Discourse of Modernity. Twelve Lectures. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press: pp.: 161–184.

Hägglund, Martin. 2008. Radical Atheism. Derrida and the Time of Life. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

Kaarto, Tomi. 2008. Jacques Derrida and the Question of Interpretation. The Phenomenological Reduction, the Intention of the Author, and Kafka’s Law. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.

Kates, Joshua. 2005. Jacques Derrida and the Development of Deconstruction. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.

Kramer, Sina. 2014. “Derrida’s ‘Antigonanette’: On the Quasi-transcendental.” The Southern Journal of Philosophy 52 (4): 521–551.

Lawlor, Leonard. 2002. Derrida and Husserl. The Basic Problem of Phenomenology. Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.

Marrati, Paola. 2005. Genesis and Trace. Derrida Reading Husserl and Heidegger. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

Pérez León, Rebeca. 2024. “Philosophical Responsibility. Derrida’s Historical and Ethical Task.” Angelaki. Journal of the Theoretical Humanities 20 (1-2): 156–168.

Ricoeur, Paul. 1967. “Husserl and the Sense of History.” In: Husserl. An Analysis of his Phenomenology. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press: pp.: 143–174.

Searle, John. 1983. “The Word Turned Upside Down.” URL: The Word Turned Upside Down | John R. Searle | The New York Review of Books (last accessed: December 29, 2025).

Žižek, Slavoj. 2000. “History Against Historicism.” European Journal of English Studies 4 (2): 101–110.