Inđić and Velázquez: pages: 664-678

Miloš Ćipranić

doi:10.2298/FID1603670C

Autori

Miloš Ćipranić Faculty of Philosophy, University of Belgrade

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.2298/FID1603670C

Apstrakt

The aim of this paper is to call into question the logic of interpretation of the texts of Ortega y Gasset about Velázquez made by Trivo Inđić. The sociologist from Belgrade in his text „Ortega i Velaskes“ [„Ortega and Velázquez“] overlooked an important question which the philosopher from Madrid proposed with regard to his interpretation of Velázquez - what is actually the condition of possibility to comprehend the work of (this) painter? Painting is a mute form of expression. Ortega y Gasset asks - how to speak about the persons who do not speak? Because Trivo Inđić did not stress the importance of this question and did not discover this transcendental motif, his text will be problematized in that direction. Keywords: mutism, painting, José Ortega y Gasset, Trivo Inđić, Diego Velázquez

Reference

Atanasijević, Ksenija (1967): „Humanistička misao španskog filosofa Hose Ortege i Gaseta“, Savremenik 3 (13): 234–253.
Damnjanović, Milan (1985): „Mesto estetike u filozofskom mišljenju Ortege i Gaseta“, Književna kritika 1 (16): 40–50.
Inđić, Trivo (1982): Savremena Španija, Beograd: Nolit.
— (1985a): Uspon masa, Beograd: IIC SSO Srbije.
— (1985b): „Ortega i Velaskes“, Književna kritika 1 (16): 33–39.
Maravall, José Antonio (1975): La Cultura del Barroco, Barcelona: Ariel.
Ortega y Gasset, José (1963-1969): Obras completas I–XI, Madrid: Revista de Occidente.