The Foucault Effect in the Sociology of Knowledge
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.2298/FID2301153RKeywords:
Foucault, genealogy, knowledge, power, sociology of knowledgeAbstract
This research proposes that Foucault’s concepts of power/knowledge and genealogy constitute a significant turning point, not only in philosophical and historical terms but also in the research framework of the sociology of knowledge. The first level of Foucault’s contribution to the sociology of knowledge is widely recognized through the concept of discourse and its dimensions of materiality, power and knowledge. The second level is the analytical grid of power/knowledge itself, which focuses on the relays established between them. The third level, which we consider a crucial area open to further interpretation, is the concept of the history of the present. Although Foucault’s contribution has already been acknowledged in contemporary sociological research of knowledge, our objective is to expand on this recognition by highlighting the significance of genealogy’s dimensions to existing approaches, namely the historical sociology of knowledge and sociology of knowledge approach to discourse.
References
Anter, Andreas (2014), Max Weber’s Theory of the Modern State: Origins, Structure and Significance, New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Armstrong, Peter (2015), “The Discourse of Michel Foucault: A Sociological Encounter”, Critical Perspectives on Accounting 27 (March): 29–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpa.2013.10.009
Berger, Peter L.; Luckmann, Thomas (1991), The Social Construction of Reality: A Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge, London: Penguin Books.
Bloor, David (1976), Knowledge and Social Imagery, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Burchell, Graham; Gordon, Colin; Miller, Peter (eds.) (1991), The Foucault Effect: Studies in Governmentality with Two Lectures by and an Intervju with Michel Foucault, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Crowley, Una (2009), “Genealogy, Method”, in Rob Kitchin, Nigel Thrift (eds.), International Encyclopedia of Human Geography, Amsterdam: Elsevier, pp. 341–344.
Dean, Mitchell (2010), Governmentality: Power and Rule in Modern Society, 2nd ed. London: Sage.
Diaz-Bone, Rainer; D. Bührman, Andrea; Gutiérrez Rodriguez, Encarnación; Schneider, Werner; Kendall, Gavin; Tirado, Francisco (2007), “The Field of Foucaultian Discourse Analysis: Structures, Developments and Perspectives” [52 paragraphs], Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research 8 (2): Art. 30. https://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/234 (viewed 22 September, 2022)
Elden, Stuart (2003), “Reading Genealogy as Historical Ontology”, in Alan Rosenberg and Alan Milchman (eds.), Foucault/Heidegger: Critical encounters, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, pp. 187–205.
—. (2017), Foucault: The Birth of Power, Cambridge: Polity.
Erlenbusch-Anderson, Verena (2020), “Genealogy as Multiplicity, Contestation, and Relay: Response to Samir Haddad, Sarah Hansen, and Cressida Heyes”, Foucault Studies 28: 25–35.
Foucault, Michel (1980a), “The Politics of Health in the Eighteenth Century”, in Colin Gordon (ed.), Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings 1972-1977, New York: Pantheon Books, pp. 166–183.
—. (1980b), “Truth and Power”, in Colin Gordon (ed.), Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings 1972-1977, New York: Pantheon Books, pp. 109–134.
—. (1986), “Of Other Spaces”, Diacritics 16 (1): 22–27. available at https://doi.org/10.2307/464648 (viewed 4 April, 2017)
—. (1988), “Technologies of the Self”, in Martin H. Luther, Huck Gutman, Patrick H. Hutton (eds.), Technologies of the Self: A Seminar with Michel Foucault, London: Tavistock Publications, pp. 16–50.
—. (1989), “Foucault Responds to Sartre”, in Sylvère Lotringer (ed.), Foucault Live, New York: Semiotext(e), pp. 51–57.
—. (1991), “Questions of Method”, in Burchell, Graham, Colin Gordon, Peter Miller (eds.), The Foucault Effect: Studies in Governmentality with Two Lectures by and an Interview with Michel Foucault, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, pp. 73–86.
—. (1994a), “Pouvoir et corps”, in Daniel Defert, Francois Ewald (eds.), Dits et écrits, Vol. 2: 1970-1975, Paris: Gallimard, pp. 754–760.
—. (1994b), “Questions à Michel Foucault sur la géographie”, in Daniel Defert, Francois Ewald (eds.), Dits et écrits, Vol. 3: 1976-1979, Paris: Gallimard, pp. 28–40.
—. (1995), Discipline and Punish, New York: Vintage Books.
—. (2002), The Archaeology of Knowledge, London and New York: Routledge.
—. (2003), The Birth of the Clinic, London and New York: Routledge.
—. (2005), The Order of Things, London and New York: Routledge.
—. (2006), History of Madness, London and New York: Routledge.
—. (2007), “What is Critique?”, in Sylvère Lotringer, Lysa Hochroth (eds.), The Politics of Truth, New York: Semiotext(e), pp. 41–83.
—. (2015), The Punitive Society: Lectures at the Collège de France 1972-1973, New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Fox, Nick J (1998), “Foucault, Foucauldians and Sociology”, British Journal of Sociology 49 (3): 415–433.
Grant, Barbara (1997), “Disciplining Students: The Construction of Student Subjectivities”, British Journal of Sociology of Education 18 (1): 101–114.
Hacking, Ian (2004), “Between Michel Foucault and Erving Goffman: Between Discourse in the Abstract and Face-to-face Interaction”, Economy and Society 33 (3): 277–302.
Haddad, Samir (2020), “Examining Genealogy as Engaged Critique”, Foucault Studies 28: 4–9.
Hook, Derek (2005), “Genealogy, Discourse, ‘Effective History’: Foucault and the Work of Critique”, Qualitative Research in Psychology 2 (1): 3–31.
Keller, Reiner (2011), Wissenssoziologische Diskursforschung. Grundlegung eines Forschungsprogramms, Wiesbaden: VS-verlag.
—. (2012), “Entering Discourses: A New Agenda for Qualitative Research and Sociology of knowledge”, Qualitative Sociology Review 8 (2): 46–75.
—. (2013), Doing Discourse Research: An Introduction for Social Scientists, London: Sage Publications.
Khan, Tauhid H.; MacEachen, Ellen (2021), “Foucauldian Discourse Analysis: Moving Beyond a Social Constructionist Analytic”, International Journal of Qualitative Methods 20. available at https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069211018009 (viewed 22 September, 2022)
Koopman, Colin (2013), Genealogy as Critique: Foucault and the Problems of Modernity, Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.
Kuhn, Thomas S. (1962), The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, Chicago: Chicago University Press.
Lupton, Deborah (1995), The Imperative of Health: Public Health and the Regulated Body, London: Sage.
—. (2016), The Quantified Self: A Sociology of Self-Tracking, Cambridge, UK: Polity.
Mannheim, Karl (2015), Ideology and Utopia: Introduction to the Sociology of Knowledge, Eastford, CT: Martino Fine Books.
Marinković, Dušan; Ristić, Dušan (2016), “Foucault’s ‘Hall of Mirrors’: an Investigation into Geo-Epistemology”, Geografiska Annaler: Series B, Human Geography 98 (2): 83–96.
—. (2017), “Genealogija transformacija klasnih strategija: videti, govoriti, znati”, Sociologija 59 (3): 253–274.
Messner, Martin; Jordan, Silvia (2019), “Knowledge and Critique. A Foucauldian Perspective”, available at https://warwick.ac.uk/fac/soc/wbs/conf/olkc/archive/oklc5/papers/b-1_messner.pdf (viewed 5 February, 2022)
Power, Michael (2011), “Foucault and Sociology”, Annual Review of Sociology 37 (1): 35–56.
Prior, Lindsay (1988), “The Architecture of the Hospital”, British Journal of Sociology 39 (1): 86–113.
Rabinow, Paul; Rose, Nikolas (2003), “Foucault Today”, in Paul Rabinow, Nikolas Rose (eds.), The Essential Foucault: Selections from the Essential Works of Foucault 1954-1984, New York: New Press, pp. 1–30.
Schatzki, Theodore R.; Knorr Cetina, Karin; Von Savigny, Eike (2005), The Practice Turn in Contemporary Theory, London and New York: Routledge.
Swidler, Ann (2005), “What Anchors Cultural Practices”, in Theodore R. Schatzki, Karin Knorr Cetina, Eike von Savigny (eds.), The Practice Turn in Contemporary Theory, London and New York: Routledge, 83–102.
Veyne, Paul (2010), Foucault: His Thought, His Character, Cambridge, UK: Polity.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Articles published in Philosophy and Society are open-access in accordance with the CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 License.