Embodying Metaverse as Artificial Life: At the Intersection of Media and 4E Cognition Theories
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.2298/FID2202326UKeywords:
4E cognition, immersive VR, Metaverse, ALife, Dry Bodies (DBs), evolutionary algorithmsAbstract
In the last decades of the 20th century we have seen media theories and cognitive sciences grow, mature and reach their pinnacles by analysing, each from their own disciplinary perspective, two of the same core phenomena: that of media as the environment, transmitter and creator of stimuli, and that of embodied human mind as the stimuli receiver, interpreter, experiencer, and also how both are affected by each other. Even though treating a range of very similar problems and coming to similar conclusions, this still has not brought these two disciplines closer together or resulted in their interdisciplinary approach. They did coalesce in regards to traditional media such as film, but more points of connection are needed for untangling interactive and immersive media environments and their effects on human cognition, action, and perception. With the rise of VR and VR-like systems, especially as they start to evolve into the Metaverse as their main platform of interconnectivity, the tissue of the body becomes almost physically intertwined with that of the virtual surrounding it inhabits through immersion. Simultaneously, the interest in these disciplines arises anew, and especially the need to use their concepts in an interdisciplinary way. This paper’s main interest is to bring these disciplines together in problematising the position of a physical body and its sensory-motor capabilities and their development within synthetic surroundings as Metaverse and anticipate potential downsides of Metaverse’s uncontrolled growth. We will do so also by looking into Metaverse as an artificial-life-like phenomenon, following artificial-life rules and evolving a completely new ‘corporeality’, a body which is completely adapted to virtual spaces. We call this body the Dry Body, an entity sharing cognitive resources with the physical body it is not a physical part of, but has to extend to.
References
Awodele, Oludele et al. (2015), “An Overview of Artificial Life”, International Journal of Advanced Studies in Computer Science and Engineering 4: 12.
Bedau, Mark (2007), “Artificial Life”, in Mohan Matthen, Christopher Stephens (eds.), Handbook of the Philosophy and Science, Vol 3: Philosophy of Biology, Amsterdam: Elsevier, North Holland Publishing Co.
Fingerhut, Joerg (2021), “Enacting Media. An Embodied Account of Enculturation Between Neuromediality and New Cognitive Media Theory”, Frontiers in Psychology 12: 635993.
Gershenson, Carlos et al. (internet), “Self-Organization and Artificial Life: A Review”, available at https://arxiv.org/pdf/1804.01144.pdf (viewed 10 May 2022)
Grau, Oliver (2003), Virtual Art: From Illusion to Immersion, Cambridge, MA, London: MIT Press.
Gregory, Richard L., (1997), “Knowledge in Perception and Illusion”, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences 352: 1121-1127
Heidicker, Paul, Langbehn, Eike, Steinicke, Frank (internet), “Influence of Avatar Appearance on Presence in Social VR”, available at https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Eike-Langbehn/publication/312604373_Influence_of_Avatar_Appearance_on_Presence_in_Social_VR/links/58861d10aca272b7b44cab09/Influence-of-Avatar-Appearance-on-Presence-in-Social-VR.pdf (viewed 18 May, 2022).
Heim, Michael (1995), “The Design of Virtual Reality”, in Mike Feathersone, Roger Burrows (eds.), Cyberspace/Cyberbodies/Cyberpunk: Cultures of Technological Embodiment, London, Thousand Oaks, New Delhi: SAGE Publications.
Hiesinger, Peter R. (2021), The Self Assembling Brain, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
Ilachinski, Andrew (2001), Cellular Automata: A Discrete Universe, Singapore: World Scientific Publishing.
Langton, Christopher (internet), “A New Definition of Artifilical Life”, available at http://scifunam.fisica.unam.mx/mir/langton.pdf (viewed 18 May, 2022)
Manovich, Lev (2002), The Language of New Media, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Maturana, Humberto R. (1975), “The Organization of the Living: A Theory of the Living Organization”, International Journal of Man-Machine Studies 7: 3, 313–332.
Maturana, Humberto R.; Varela, Francisco J. (1980), Autopoiesis and Cognition: The Realization of the Living, Dordrecht: Springer.
McLuhan, Marshal (1994), Understanding Media: the Extensions of Man, London: MIT Press.
Merleau-Ponty, Maurice (2002), Phenomenology of Perception, New York: Routledge.
Metzinger, Thomas K. (2018), “Why is Virtual Reality Interesting for Philosophers?”, in Frontiers in Robotics and AI 5: 101. Available at https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/frobt.2018.00101/full (viewed 25 May, 2022).
Nelson, Theodor H. (1987), Computer Lib; Dream Machines, Redmond: Tempus Books of Microsoft Press.
Parisi, Francesco (2021), “Enacting Virtual Reality”, in Alfonsina Scarinzi (ed.), Meaningful Relations: The Enactivist Making of Experiential Worlds, Baden-Baden: Academia-Verlag.
Penny, Simon (2017), Making Sense: Cognition, Computing, Art, and Embodiment, Cambridge, MA, London: MIT Press.
Shannon, Claude (1948), “A Mathematical Theory of Communication”, The Bell System Technical Journal 27.
Shapiro, Lawrence (2019), Embodied Cognition, New York: Routledge.
Slater, Mel; Sanchez-Vives, Maria V. (2016), “Enhancing Our Lives with Immersive Virtual Reality”, Frontiers Robotics AI 3: 74.
Stephenson, Neal (2011), Snow Crash, London: Penguin Random House.
Varela, Francisco J.; Thompson, Evan; Rosch, Eleanor (2016), The Embodied Mind: Cognitive Science and Human Experience, Cambridge, MA, London: MIT Press.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Articles published in Philosophy and Society are open-access in accordance with the CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 License.