Meritocracy Reconsidered Through Aristotle’s Virtue Ethics

Santiago  de Lasala; Ulzhan Kazybekova

doi:10.2298/FID2603631L

Authors

Santiago de Lasala College of Human Sciences and Education, KIMEP University
Ulzhan Kazybekova College of Social Sciences, KIMEP University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.2298/FID2603631L

Keywords:

Virtue, institutions, common good, distributive justice

Abstract

The categories of merit and meritocracy have received a lot of attention by political philosophers, especially during the second half of the 20th century. They appeal to merit as a criterion of legitimacy to rethink the distribution of wealth and resources in our society. From a superficial perspective, meritocracy is presented as open competition based on personal qualities and effort to determine how rewards are distributed. It is often seen as highly attractive and intuitively fair. In this article, we intend to analyze whether contemporary meritocracies help citizens to develop themselves, to be better citizens and better persons, to be more virtuous and to fulfill themselves, or, on the contrary, these meritocracies lead citizens to become less virtuous and therefore worse individuals. Furthermore, by extrapolating what happens to individuals, we can consider how meritocracies impact institutions and societies as a whole.For this purpose, we will draw on various philosophical perspectives, from Aristotle to the political thinkers of the 21st century. These authors offer ethical frameworks connecting the good life of the individual with personal and social development. Meritocracy may appear to emphasize the achievement of excellence by individuals, making it seem like a good match for virtue ethics. However, this article argues that Aristotelian virtue ethics is actually at odds with the raw meaning of contemporary meritocracies and may also lead to a society which is not cohesive, which is also contrary to the notion of a virtue society for Aristotle.

References

Adkins, Arthur W. H. 1960. Merit and Responsibility: A Study in Greek Values. Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press.

Aristotle. 2013. Politics. Translated by C. Lord. 2nd ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Originally published ca. 350 B.C.E.

______. 2014. Nicomachean Ethics. Edited by R. Crisp. 2nd ed. Cambridge:

Cambridge University Press. Originally published ca. 350 B.C.E.

Barrera, Yamila. 2023. “The Rise of the Meritocracy: El Surgimiento de la Categoría Meritocracia.” Política y Comunicación. doi.org/10.24215/29533821e020 Bartram, David. 2023. “Does Belief in Meritocracy Increase with Inequality? A Reconsideration for European Countries.” The British Journal of Sociology 74 (5): 763–780.

Carvalho, Jean-Paul. 2022. “Markets and Communities: The Social Cost of the Meritocracy.” Journal of Institutional Economics 18 (3): 501–519.

Cho, Youli, Zheng Fang, and Nicholas Cheng Siang Sin. 2023. “Meritocratic Beliefs and Economic Growth: A Mediating Effect of Economic Inequality.” Asia and the Global Economy 3: 1–9.

Cowen, Nicholas. 2021. “Rescuing Rawls from Rawls.” The Independent Review 26 (3):361–366. Retrieved September 16, 2025. https://www.jstor.org/stable/48647377

Dimić, Zoran. 2023. “The Role of Education in Aristotle’s Politics.” Philosophy and Society 34 (1): 32–42.

Graafland, Johan J. 2010. “Do Markets Crowd Out Virtues? An Aristotelian Framework.” Journal of Business Ethics 91 (1): 1–19.

Güremen, Refik. 2018. “In What Sense Exactly Are Human Beings More Political According to Aristotle?” Philosophy and Society 29 (2): 153–316.

Knight, Kelvin. 2025. “Thomistic Aristotelians on Practices, Governing and Institutions.” In: Redín, Dulce M., Garrett W. Potts, and Omowumi Ogunyemi, eds. MacIntyre and the Practice of Governing Institutions. Cham: Springer: pp.: 21–36.

MacIntyre, Alasdair. 2007. After Virtue: A Study in Moral Theory. 3rd ed. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press. (Orig. pub. 1981).

Markovits, Daniel. 2019. The Meritocracy Trap: How America’s Foundational Myth Feeds Inequality, Dismantles the Middle Class, and Devours the Elite. New York: Penguin Press.

Mijs, Jonathan J. B. 2021. “The Paradox of Inequality: Income Inequality and Belief in Meritocracy Go Hand in Hand.” Socio-Economic Review 19 (1): 7–35.

Morrell, Kevin, and Frederik Dahlmann. 2023. “Aristotle in the Anthropocene: The Comparative Benefits of Aristotelian Virtue Ethics over Utilitarianism and Deontology.” The Anthropocene Review 10 (3): 615–635.

Morris, Katharina et al. 2022. “The Paradox of Local Inequality: Meritocratic Beliefs in Unequal Localities.” The British Journal of Sociology 73 (2): 421–460.

Mulligan, Thomas. 2022. “How East Meets West: Justice and Consequences in Confucian Meritocracy.” Journal of Confucian Philosophy and Culture 37: 17–38.

Pojman, Louis. 1997. “Equality and Desert.” Philosophy 72 (282): 549–570. Retrieved February 2, 2026. http://www.jstor.org/stable/3752010

Rawls, John. 1971. A Theory of Justice. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press/Harvard University Press.

Sachs-Cobbe, Ben. 2023. “Recent Work on Meritocracy.” Analysis 83 (1): 171–185.

Sandel, Michael J. 2020. The Tyranny of Merit: What’s Become of the Common Good? New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.

______. 2021. “How Meritocracy Fuels Inequality—Part I The Tyranny of Merit: An Overview.” American Journal of Law and Equality 1: 1–14.

Sardoc, Mitja. 2022. “The Trouble with Merit.” Theory and Research in Education 20 (2): 135–144.

Sinnicks, Matthew. 2021. “‘We Ought to Eat in Order to Work, Not Vice Versa’: MacIntyre, Practices, and the Best Work for Humankind.” Journal of Business Ethics 174 (2): 263–274.

Tejero-Peregrina, Lope et al. 2025. “From Perceived Economic Inequality to Support for Redistribution: The Role of Meritocracy Perception.” International Review of Social Psychology 38 (1): 1–14. von Platz, Jeppe. 2022. “The Principle of Merit and the Capital-Labour Split.” Economics and Philosophy 38 (1): 1–23.

Young, Michael. 1958. The Rise of Meritocracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Zhang, Tong. 2024. “The Illusion of Meritocracy.” Social Science Information 63 (1): 114–128.