THE POPULIST MATRIX OF OBSESSIVE-OPPRESSIVE POWER AND ITS PHANTASMATIC NOVELTY: TOWARDS A DELIRIC SAMENESS OF CHANGES
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.2298/FID241008002FKeywords:
conspiratorial discourse, populism, phantasm, enjoyment, paranoiaAbstract
Contemporary changes in favor of the populist matrix thematization involve examination of the signifier-inaugural power of conspiratorial discourses as a symptom and political method of Serbian society democratic structure marginalization. Admittedly, the state’s re-dramatization of conspiracists’ phantasms of the enemy’s horrifying hidden actions is not interpreted exclusively in the light of the political contagion that global, populist mind employs to write contemporary history. It is neither the central epistemic structure of the post-factual world which mandates the state’s manipulation of paranoid fear should be exclusively interpreted as part of the competition of multiple discourses for a hegemonic position. This study suggests political effects of creating phantasmatic content are reflected in maintaining the counter-revolutionary fervor of populist rule and traditional affiliation politics. Fully comprehending democratic standards’ self discrediting relies on psychoanalytical assumptions about
the predetermination of the subject by its phantasms having been placed in the field of the unconscious and the Lacanian anticipation of the permanent impossibility of bearing one’s own self and desires. Ensuring proofs that the systemic incitement of irrational suspicion through the regime’s media supports the self-establishment of ruling-class credibility, as well as getting to know the way in which the familiar dramaturgy of guilt is applied to ensure new legitimization procedures points to the interpretation of change as a difference in the relationship between social and phantasmatic forces.
References
Arent, Hana. 1998. Izvori totalitarizma. Beograd: Feministička izdavačka kuća.
Albertazzi, Daniele, and Duncan McDonnell. 2016. Populists in Power. London, New York: Routledge.
Austin, Michael. 2016. “The Question of Lacanian Ontology: Badiou and Žižek as Responses to Seminar XI.” International Journal of Žižek Studies 5(2): 1–12.
Bajford, Jovan. 2006. Teorija zavere: Srbija protiv novog srpskog poretka. Beograd: Beogradski centar za ljudska prava.
Bangerter, Adrian, Pascal Wagner-Egger, and Sylvain Delouvee. 2020. “.” In: Butter, Michael, and Peter Knight, eds. Routledge Handbook of Conspiracy Theory. London, NY: Routledge: pp.: 206–219.
Barcun, Michael. 2006. A Culture of Conspiracy: Apocalyptic Visions in Contemporary America. Oakland: University of California Press.
Basham, Lee. 2018. “Conspiracy Theory Particularism, Both Moral and Epistemic, Versus Generalism.” In: Dentith, Matthew, ed. Taking Conspiracy Theories Seriously. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers: pp.: 39–58.
Batler, Džudit, 2020. Prekarni život. Novi Sad: Mediterran Publishing.
Biber, Florijan. 2020. Uspon autoritarizma na Zapadnom Balkanu. Beograd: Biblioteka XX vek.
Bilewitz, Michal, and Mikolaj Winiewski. 2013. “Harmful Ideas: The Structure and the Consequences of Anti-Semitic Beliefs in Poland.” Political Pshychology 34(6): 821–839.
Blanuša, Nebojša. 2011. “Depathologized Conspiracy Theories and Cynical Reason: Discursive Positions and Phantasmatic Structures.” Politička misao: časopis za politologiju 1:94–107.
Blanuša, Nebojša, and Todor Hristov. 2020. “Psychoanalysis, Critical Theory and Conspiracy Theory.” In: Butter, Michael, and Peter Knight, eds. Routledge Handbook of Conspiracy Theory. New York: Routledge: pp.: 67–80.
Bronner, Gerald. 2015. “Why Are Conspiracy Theories Doing So Well?” Diogenes 62: 8–16.
Butter, Michale, and Peter Knight. 2020. Routledge Handbook of Conspiracy Theory. New York: Routledge.
Byford, Jovan. 2011. Conspiracy Theories. Basingstoke, New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Clarke, Steve. 2002. “Conspiracy Theories and Conspiracy Theorizing.” Philosophy of Social Sciences 32(2): 131–150.
Ćosić, Bora. 2019. Povest o Miškinu. Beograd: LOM Books.
Deleuze, Gilles. 1983. Nietzsche and Philosophy. New York: Columbia University Press.
Demata, Massimiliano, Virginia Zorzi, and Angela Zottola. 2022. Conspiracy Theories Discourses. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Dolar, Mladen. 2017. Oficiri, služavke i dimničari. Novi Sad: Akademska knjiga.
Diković, Jovana. 2011. “Teorije zavere kao alternativni režimi istine i univerzalni sociokulturni fenomen.” Etnoantropološki problemi 2: 333–348.
Evans, Dylan. 2006. An Introductory Dictionary of Lacanian Psychoanalysis. London, New York: Routledge.
Fatić, Aleksandar, and Bulatović, Aleksandra. 2021. “Moralna normativnost i duševno zdravlje: lakanovsko razumevanje neuroze i psihoze u svetlu integrativne terapije.” In: Mikulić, Borislav, Mislav Žitko, and Srđan Damjanović, eds. Psihoanaliza i njene sudbine. Zagreb: Filozofski fakultet: pp.: 201–219.
Fenster, Mark. 2008. Conspiracy Theories: Secrecy and Power in American Culture. Minneapolis: University of Minesota Press.
Fuko, Mišel. 2013. Istorija ludila u doba klasicizma. Novi Sad: Mediterran Publishing.
Fuko, Mišel. 1995. “Niče, geneaologija, istorija.” Theoria 38(1): 79–96.
Giry, Julien, and Dogar Gurpinar. 2020. “Function and Uses Conspiracy Theories in Authoritarian Regimes.” In: Butter, Michael, and Peter Knight, eds. Routledge Handbook of Conspiracy Theory. London, NY: Routledge: pp.: 317–330.
Hofstadter, Richard. 1967. The Paranoid Style in American Politics. London: Cape.
Groh, Dieter. 1987. “The Temptation of Conspiracy Theory.” In: Graumann, Carl F., and Serge Moscovici, eds. Changing Conceptions of Conspiracy. NY: Springer-Verlag: pp.:1–13.
Goertzel, Ted. 2010. “Conspiracy Theories in Science.” EMBO Reports, 11:493-499.
Hristov, Todor. 2019. Impossible Knowledge. London, NY: Routledge.
Herkman, Juha. 2021. A Cultural Approach to Populism. London, NY: Routledge.
Imhoff, Roland, and Martin Bruder. 2014. “Speaking (Un–)Truth to Power: Conspiracy Mentality as a Generalised Political Attitude.” European Journal of Personality 28(1): 25-43.
Jolley, Daniel, Silvia Mari, and Karen Douglas. 2020. “Consequences of Conspiracy Theories.” In: Butter, Michael, and Peter Knight, eds. Routledge Handbook of Conspiracy Theory. London, NY: Routledge: pp.: 231–242.
Kofta, Miroslaw, and Grzegorz Sedek. 2005. “Conspiracy Stereotypes of Jews During Systematic Transformation in Poland.” International Journal of Sociology 35(1): 40–64.
Krastev, Ivan. 2011. The Age of Populism: Reflections on the Self-Enmity of Democracy. European View 1: 111–116.
Krstić, Predrag. 2022. O čemu govorimo kada govorimo o (post)istini. Beograd: Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju.
Lacan, Jacques. 2011. “Ključevi za psihonalizu.” In: Aničić, Dejan, ed. Uvod u delo Žaka Lakana. Loznica: Karpos: pp.: 121–139.
______. 2004. Ecrits. New York: Norton W.W. & Company.
______. 1983. The Four Fundamental Concepts of Psychoanalysis. New York: Norton W.W. & Company.
______. 1966-67. Le Seminaire. Livre XIV. La logic du fantasme. unpublished.
______. 1956. “Fetishism: the symbolic, the imaginary and the real.” In: Balint, Michalel, ed. Perversion: Psychodynamics and Therapy. New York: Random House: pp.: 265–276.
LaCapra, Dominick. 2001. Writing History, Writing Trauma. Baltimor: Hopkins University Press.
Laclau, Ernesto. 2005. On Populist Reason. London, NY: Verso.
Lošonc, Alpar. 2017. “Da li populizam objašnjava otpor spram autoritarizma.” In: Simendić, Marko, ed. Demokratski otpori normalizacije autoritarizma u Evropi. Beograd: Udruženje za političke studije: pp.: 9–29.
Lukić, Petar. 2020. “Idući između dve paradigme – sociokulturalni pristup u izučavanju teorija zavere.” Sociologija 2: 197–216.
McGowan, Todd. 2004. The End of Dissatisfaction? New York: SUNY Press.
______. 2021. “The Distribution of Enjoyment.” European Journal of Psychoanalysis. URL: https://www.journal-psychoanalysis.eu/articles/the-distribution-of-enjoyment (Last accesed: April 16, 2024)
Močnik, Rastko. 2003. Tri teorije: Ideologija, Nacija, Institucija. Beograd: Centar za savremenu umetnost.
______. 2016. Spisi o suvremenom kapitalizmu. Zagreb: Jesenski i Turk.
______. 2019. Teorija sa ideologijom. Beograd: FMK.
Mudde, Cas. 2004. “The Populist Zeitgeist.” Government and Opposition 39: 541–563.
Nietzsche, Fridrich. 2014. On the Geneaology of Morals. London: Penguin Classics.
Perunović, Andrea. 2024. “Mistrust and Political Jouissance: From a `Tickle` to the `Blaze of Petrol.” In: Barria-Asenjo, Nicol, and Slavoj Žižek, eds. Political Jouissance. London, New York, Dublin: Bloomsbury Academic: pp.: 43–56.
______. 2021. “Subject and (Post)Truth Between Philosophy and Psychoanalysis: An Interview with Alenka Zupančič.” Filozofija i društvo 32(4): 757–769.
Pipes, Daniel. 1997. Conspiracy: How the Paranoid Style Flourishes and Where It Comes From. New York: Touchstone.
Podunavac, Milan. 2021. Režimi straha. Podgorica: Univerzitet Donja Gorica.
Priester, K. 2012. Rechter und Linker Populismus: Annäherung an ein Chamäleon. Frankfurt: Campus
Prole, Dragan. 2018. “Fascinirani zavidnik.” In: Prole, Dragan, and Alpar Lošonc, eds. Zavist. Novi Sad: Adresa: pp.: 35–69.
Prooijen, Jan-Willen van, Olivier Klein, and Jasna Milošević Đorđević. 2020. “Social-Cognitive Processes Underlying Belief in Conspiracy Theories.” In: Butter, Michael, and Peter Knight, eds. Routledge Handbook of Conspiracy Theory. New York: Routledge: pp.: 168–181.
Raikka, Juha, and Juho Ritola. 2020. “Philosophy and Conspiracy Theories.” In: Butter, Michale, and Peter Knight, eds. Routledge Handbook of Conspiracy Theory. New York: Routledge: pp.: 56–66.
Robins, Robert, and Jerrold Post. 1997. Political Paranoia: The Psychopolitics of Hatred. New Haven, London: Yale University Press.
Rudinesko, Elizabet, and Mišel Plon. 2002. Leksikon psihoanalize. Sremski Karlovci: Izdavačka knjižarnica Zorana Stojanovića.
Stavrakakis, Yanis. 2002. Lacan and the Political. London, NY: Routledge.
Stoica, Mihnea. 2017. “Political Myths of the Populist Discourse.” Journal for the Study of Religions and Ideologies 16(46): 63–76.
Turner, Kirk. 2023. Lacanian Fantasy. London, NY: Routledge.
Uscinski, Joseph. 2020. Conspiracy Theories: A Primer. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
Vassiliou, Phaidon Thymios Benedetti. 2017. “Enemies of the People: Latin-American Populism, Political Myth and the Psychodynamics of Conspiracy Thinking.” Επιστήμη και Κοινωνία: Επιθεώρηση Πολιτικής και Ηθικής Θεωρίας 35: 135–59.
Vranić, Bojan. 2019. “A Clash of Myths: Populism and Ethno-Nationalism in Serbia.” In: Heinisch, Reinhard, Emanuele Masseti, and Oscar Mazzoleni, eds. The People and the Nation, London, NY: Routledge: pp.: 256–279.
Zoja, Luigi. 2017. Paranoia: The Madness that Makes History. London; New York: Routledge.
Zupančič, Alenka. 2024. Disavowal. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Žižek, Slavoj. 1989. The Sublime Object of Ideology. London: Verso.
______. 2008. The Plague of Fantasies. London: Verso.
______. 2012. Organi bez tela. Beograd: FMK.
______. 2019. Kao lopov usred dana: moć u doba post-čovečanstva. Beograd: Laguna.
______. 2021. Pandemija! 2 Hronika izgubljenog vremena. Novi Sad: Akademska knjiga.
Wodak, Ruth. 2015. The Politics of Fear: What Right-wing Populist Discourses Mean. London: Sage.
Wojczewski, Thorsten. 2021. “Conspiracy Theories, Right-Wing Populism and Foreign Policy: The Case of the Alternative for Germany.” Journal of International Relations and Development 25: 130–158.
______. 2023. The Inter- and Transnational Politics of Populism, Foreign Policy, Identity and Popular Sovereignty. London: Palgrave MacMillan.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Articles published in Philosophy and Society are open-access in accordance with the CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 License.