Liberal Provocations: Why Carlo Rosselli Is still Relevant Today

Authors

  • Florian Maiwald University of Bonn, Germany

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.2298/FID2504937M

Keywords:

Liberalism, Socialism, Rosselli, anti-fascism, Geuss, Horkheimer, freedom, democracy, economy, Marxism

Abstract

Liberal and socialist worldviews are often seen as being in a fundamental opposition. This is reinforced immensely either by Francis Fukuyma’s apostrophised end of history or by the thesis put forward by authors such as Patrick Deneen that liberalism has failed. The question that arises on closer examination of this assumption is whether or not it is accurate. Based on Carlo Rosselli’s work Socialismo Liberale (Liberal Socialism), this article attempts to systematically challenge this thesis. Against the backdrop of the rise of fascism in Italy, Rosselli comes to the realisation – contrary to many representatives of orthodox Marxism – that the liberal and socialist worldviews are not necessarily antagonistic to one another. In fact, they may even be mutually dependent – an important insight to think social change anew.

References

Barber, Lionel, Henry Foy, and Alex Barker. 2019. “Vladimir Putin Says Liberalism Has ‘Become Obsolete.’” Financial Times, June 27. URL: https://www.ft.com/content/670039ec-98f3-11e9-9573-ee5cbb98ed36 (last accessed: September 8, 2025).

Bastow, Steve, and James Martin. 2003. “Italian Liberal Socialism: Anti-Fascism and the Third Way.” In: Bastow, Steve, and James Martin, eds. The Third Way and Beyond: Criticisms, Futures and Alternatives. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press: pp.: 72–92.

Bauman, Zygmunt. 1976. Socialism: The Active Utopia. London: Allen and Unwin.

Calabrò, Carmelo. 2020. “Anti-Fascism by Carlo Rosselli and British Socialism.” In: Colacicco, Tamara, ed. Fascism and Anti-Fascism in Great Britain. Pisa: Pacini Editore: pp.: 191–207.

Deneen, Patrick J. 2018. Why Liberalism Failed. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

Geuss, Raymond. 2023. Nicht wie ein Liberaler denken. Berlin: Suhrkamp Verlag.

Gramsci, Antonio. 2007. Prison Notebooks, Volume 3. Translated and edited by Joseph A. Buttigieg. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.

Horkheimer, Max. 1939. Studies in Philosophy and Social Science. Paris: Librairie Felix Alcan.

Pugliese, Stanislao. 2007. “In Defense of Liberal Socialism: Carlo Rosselli’s Legacy.” Italian Americana 25 (1): 23–36.

Rooksby, Ed. 2012. “The Relationship Between Liberalism and Socialism.” Science & Society 76 (4): 495–520.

Rosselli, Carlo, and Nadia Urbinati. 1994. Liberal Socialism. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Wright, C. 2023. “Postliberalism: A Dangerous ‘New’ Conservatism.” The Philosophical Salon, October 16. URL: https://www.thephilosophicalsalon. com/postliberalism-a-dangerous-new-conservatism/ (last accessed: September 8, 2025).

Zissimos, Ben. 2022. “The End of the End of History: A Political-Economy Perspective.” Intereconomics 57 (6): 372–376. URL: https://www. intereconomics.eu/contents/year/2022/number/6/article/the-end-of-

the-end-of-history-a-political-economy-perspective.html (last accessed:

September 8, 2025).

Published

27.12.2025

How to Cite

“Liberal Provocations: Why Carlo Rosselli Is still Relevant Today” (2025) Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society, 36(4), pp. 937–954. doi:10.2298/FID2504937M.

Similar Articles

1-10 of 213

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.