Voting after Transition: Political Preferences of Serbia’s Transitional Losers

Nikola Jović; Dejan Bursać

doi:10.2298/FID2502501J

Authors

Nikola Jović Faculty of Political Science, University of Belgrade
Dejan Bursać Institute for Philosophy and Social Theory, University of Belgrade

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.2298/FID2502501J

Keywords:

economic crisis, transitional losers, voter preferences, elections, populism, Serbia

Abstract

Economic crises create specific social conditions that affect voter preferences and behaviors. The Global Financial Crisis of 2007-2008 reached Serbia a year later, causing a major shock to the fragile Serbian economy, already burdened by the legacies of wars and international isolation during the 1990s, compounded by inequalities and uncertainties stemming from the delayed transition. Subsequent elections brought the collapse of the post-2000 political consensus, with many liberal and social democratic parties never recovering. This led to the domination of the populist Serbian Progressive Party (SNS) in the party system from there on. The main hypothesis of this article posits that the 2008 crisis solidified the pool of transitional losers composed of low skilled workers, the unemployed, low educated, rural populations, and elderly, providing continuous support for SNS ever since. The authors investigate whether the socioeconomic status of these groups still correlates with SNS votes, even though the party has been in power for 12 years. If the correlation stands, it implies that past economic traumas continue to influence voter preferences to this day. The study utilizes original data from two nationwide public opinion surveys.

References

Algan, Yann, et al. 2017. “The European Trust Crisis and the Rise of Populism.” Brookings Papers on Economic Activity Fall 2017: 309– 382.

Beck, Ulrich. 2006. Power in the Global Age: A New Global Political Economy. Cambridge: Polity.

Berman, Sheri, and Maria Snegovaya. 2019. “Populism and the Decline of Social Democracy.” Journal of Democracy 30 (3): 5–19.

Bieber, Florian. 2018. “The Rise (and Fall) of Balkan Stabilitocracies.” Horizons: Journal of International Relations and Sustainable Development 10: 176–185.

Brainerd, Elizabeth. 1998. “Winners and Losers in Russia’s Economic Transition.” The American Economic Review 88 (5): 1094–1116.

Bursać, Dejan, and Dušan Vučićević. 2021. “Election boycott in a hybrid regime: The case of 2020 parliamentary elections in Serbia.” New Perspectives 29 (2): 187–196.

Caiani, Manuela, and Paolo Graziano. 2021. “Understanding varieties of populism in times of crises.” In: Caiani, Manuela & Paolo Graziano, eds. Varieties of Populism in Europe in Times of Crises. London: Routledge, pp. 1141–1158.

Danilova, Elena. 2014. “Neoliberal Hegemony and Narratives of Losers and Winners in Post-Socialist Transformations.” Journal of Narrative Theory 44 (3): 442–466.

Eiermann, Martin, Yascha Mounk, and Limor Gultchin. 2017. European Populism: Trends, Threats and Future Prospects. London: Institute for Global Change.

Farkas, Beata. 2016. Models of Capitalism in the European Union: Post-crisis Perspectives. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

Fidrmuc, Jan. 2000. “Economics of voting in post-communist countries.” Electoral Studies 19 (2–3): 199–217.

Freedom House. 2024. URL: https://freedomhouse.org/report/nations-transit/2024/region-reordered-autocracy-and-democracy (last accessed: April 16, 2025).

Gidron, Noam, and Peter A. Hall. 2017. “The politics of social status: economic and cultural roots of the populist right.” British Journal of Sociology 68 (S1): 57–84.

Hernandez, Enrique, and Hanspeter Kriesi. 2016. “The electoral consequences of the financial and economic crisis in Europe.” European Journal of Political Research 55 (2): 203–224.

Kreko, Peter, and Attila Juhasz. 2017. The Hungarian Far Right: Social Demand, Political Supply, and International Context. Stuttgart: Ibidem-Verlag.

Kriesi, Hanspeter. 2015. “Populism: concepts and conditions for its rise in Europe.” Comunicazione politica 16 (2): 175–194.

Laclau, Ernesto. 1977. Politics and Ideology in Marxist Theory. London: New Left Books.

Leigh, Andrew. 2005. “Economic voting and electoral behavior: How do individual, local, and national factors affect the partisan choice?” Economics & Politics 17 (2): 265–296.

Mateju, Petr. 2012. “Winners and losers in the post-communist transformation: The Czech Republic in comparative perspective.” Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research 9 (3): 371–390.

Miller, G. J. 1997. “The impact of economics on contemporary political science.” Journal of Economic Literature 35: 1173–1204.

Moffitt, Benjamin. 2015. “How to Perform Crisis: A Model for Understanding the Key Role of Crisis in Contemporary Populism.” Government and Opposition 50 (2): 189–217.

Mutz, Diana C. 2018. “Status threat, not economic hardship, explains the 2016 presidential vote.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. URL: http://www.pnas.org/content/pnas/early/2018/04/18/1718155115.full.pdf (last accessed: May 28, 2024).

National Bank of Serbia. 2023. URL: https://www.nbs.rs/en/ (last accessed: May 28, 2024).

Owczarek, Dominik. 2017. “The roots of populism in Poland: Unsustainable growth and cultural backlash.” CIDOB report 1/2017: 39–43.

Pavlović, Dušan. 2019. “The political economy behind the gradual demise of democratic institutions in Serbia.” Southeast European and Black Sea Studies 20 (1): 19–39.

Pavlović, Dušan, and Ivan Stanojević. 2016. “Ponuda ekonomskih politika u izbornoj kampanji 2016. godine.” In: Jovanović, Milan, and Dušan Vučićević, eds. Izbori u Srbiji 2016. godine: Istorijska ili pirova pobeda? Beograd: Institut za političke studije, pp. 81–111.

Pejković, Marko. 2013. “Predsednički izbori u Srbiji 2012 – Statistička analiza ekonomskog i etničkog glasanja.” In: Jovanović, Milan, and Dušan Vučićević, eds. Izbori u Srbiji 2012. godine: (Ne)očekivana promena. Beograd: Institut za političke studije, pp. 31–48.

Spasojević, Dušan. 2019a. “Transforming populism – from protest vote to ruling ideology: The case of Serbia.” In: Beširević, Violeta, ed. The new politics of decisionism. The Hague: Eleven International Publishing, pp. 125–140.

______. 2019b. “Riding the wave of distrust and alienation – new parties in Serbia after 2008.” Politics in Central Europe 15 (1): 139–162.

Spehar, Andrea. 2006. “Eastern European Women, Winners or Losers in Post- Communist Transitions?” Research on European Issues 18: 99–124.

Titma, Mikk, Nancy B. Tuma, and Brian D. Silver. 1999. Winners and Losers in the Post-Communist Transition: New Evidence from Latvia. Washington: The National Council for Eurasian and East European Research.

V-Dem. 2024. URL: https://www.v-dem.net/publications/democracy-reports/ (last accessed: April 16, 2025).

Verhoeven, Willem-Jan, Wim Jansen, and Jos Dessens. 2009. “Losers in Market Transition: The Unemployed, the Retired, and the Disabled.” European Sociological Review 25 (1): 103–122.

Wilkin, Peter. 2016. Hungary’s Crisis of Democracy: The Road to Serfdom. London: Lexington Books.