From Devotion to Commitment: Towards a Critical Ontology of Engagement
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.2298/FID2102261PKljučne reči:
engagement, devotion, commitment, being, subject, collectivity, world, ontologyApstrakt
This article approaches the notion of engagement from the perspective of critical ontology. With language as the starting point of its hermeneutic task, it commences with an etymological analyses of diverse Indo-European words gravitating around the semantic field of the notion of engagement. From these introductory insights obtained by an exercise in comparative linguistics, devotion and commitment are mapped as two opposite, yet inseparable, modes of being of engagement. Both of these modes seem to condition engagement in an ontologically disparate manner. While examining their fundamental structures, some of the canonical concepts of history of philosophy such as being, existence, subjectivity, or world – and also some of its constitutive binary oppositions such as body/mind, individual/collective, transcendence/immanence, light/darkness and sacred/secular – will be reconsidered through the prism of different ontological dispositions that devotion and commitment impose respectively on engagement. The overall aim of this investigation is to bring forth the main existential characteristics of being-engaged, by interpreting the roles of who, where, and what of engagement, and in order to provide a fundamental conceptual apparatus for a critical ontology of engagement.
Reference
Agamben, Giorgio (2013), Qu’est-ce que le commandement, Paris: Rivages.
Benjamin, Walter (1996), ‘Capitalism as Religion’, in Martin Bullock, Michael W. Jennings (eds.), Selected Writings, Volume 1: 1913-1926, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, pp. 288–291.
Cassin, Barbara (ed.) (2004), Vocabulaire européen des philosophies, Paris: Éditions du Seuil/Dictionnaires Le Robert.
Critchley, Simon (2009), “Being and Time, part 4: Thrown into this world” (internet), available at: https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/belief/2009/jun/29/religion-philosophy (viewed 2 September 2020).
Derrida, Jacques (2000), Foi et Savoir, suivi de Le Siècle et le Pardon, Paris: Seuil.
Descartes, René (1970), Principes de la philosophie, Paris: NRF Gallimard, La Pléiade
Gadamer, Hans-Georg (2004), Truth and Method, London – New York: Continuum.
Heidegger, Martin (1982), The Basic Problems of Phenomenology, Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
Heidegger, Martin (1962), Being and Time, Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Nancy, Jean-Luc (2000), Being Singular Plural, Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Nietzsche, Friedrich (2001), The Gay Science, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Skok, Petar (1971), Etimologijski rječnik hrvatskoga ili srpskoga jezika, Zagreb: Jugoslovenska akademija znanosti i umetnosti.
Zaharijević, Adriana (2017), “Angažman: misliti i delovati zajedno”, in Adriana Zaharijević, Jelena Vasiljević (eds.), Angažman: uvod u studije angažovanosti, Novi Sad: Akademska knjiga; Beograd: Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju, pp. 17–33.
##submission.downloads##
Objavljeno
Kako citirati
Broj časopisa
Sekcija
Licenca
Sva prava zadržana (c) 2021 Filozofija i društvo / Philosophy and Society
Ovaj rad je pod Creative Commons Aуторство-Nekomercijalno-Bez prerade 4.0 Internacionalna licenca.
Articles published in Philosophy and Society are open-access in accordance with the CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 License.