The Concept of Engagement

Chaslav D. Koprivitsa

doi:10.2298/FID2002177K

Autori

Chaslav D. Koprivitsa Professor, Faculty of Political Sciences, University of Belgrade

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.2298/FID2002177K

Ključne reči:

engagement, existential situation, uncertainty, philosophy of finitude, secularity, postmodernity

Apstrakt

In this paper, we illuminate the basic features of the concept of engagement, which has only become possible in the secular world, with the emergence of the modern individual deprived of any stable, eternal order or hierarchy of values. Still, engagement is not only individual but also collective, as the lack of certainty about the truth affects not only the community and society but also motivates them to follow the same paradigm as the individual – themselves at stake, without knowing where it could possibly lead, but with the intention to produce some tangible and stable socio-cosmic structures that could alleviate man’s uncertainty and thus insecurity. The necessity of engagement stems from the circumstance that man lives in a context saturated with meanings that call him out in advance and influence him. Therefore, engagement means actually acting back to the being-exposed to meanings and structures that have already affected man and his situation. One section of the text deals with an understanding of engagement in the contemporary, “postmodern” era.

Reference

Alkemeyer, Thomas (2007), “Aufrecht und biegsam. Eine politische Geschichte des Körperkults”, Aus Politik und Zeitgeschichte, pp 6–18.
Berleant, Arnold (2017), The Subversion of Beauty, accessed at Research Gate (13th September 2019).
Gehlen, Arnold (2016), Urmensch und Spätkukltur. Frankfurt: Vittorio Klostermann.
Heidegger, Martin (2000), Towards the Definition of Philosophy, transl. by T. Sadler. London and New Brunswick: The Athlone Press.
—. (1996), Being and Time, transl. by J. Stambaugh. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
Husserl, Edmund (1970), The Crisis of European Science and Transcendental Phenomenology. transl. by D. Carr. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.
Krainz, Waltraud (2009), “Postmoderne Körperkulturen. Riskante Bewegunspraxen”, in: M. Marschik et al. (eds.), Sport Studies, Wien: Facultas Verlags- und Buchhandels AG, pp. 239–251.
Ladrière, Jean (1969), “Еngagement”, Encyclopaedia Universalis, Vol 6, Paris, pp. 647–651.
Landsberg, Paul-Louis (1998), “Réflexions sur l’engagement personnel”, Vingtième Siècle. Revue d’histoire 60: 118–123.
Levinas, Emmanuel (1998), Entre nous: On Thinking-of-the-Other, transl. by M. B. Smith and B. Harshav. New York: Columbia University Press.
Merleau-Ponty, Maurice (1968), The Visible and the Invisible, transl. by A. Lingis. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.
Sartre, Jean-Paul (2007), Existentialism Is a Humanism. transl. by Carol Macomber. New Haven: Yale University Press.
—. (1988), “What is Literature?” and Other Essays. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Suits, Bernard (1978). The Grasshopper: Games, Life and Utopia. Toronto: Toronto University Press.