The Epistemology of Democracy: the Epistemic Virtues of Democracy

Snježana Prijić Samaržija

doi:10.2298/FID2001056P

Autori

Snježana Prijić Samaržija Professor, Department of Philosophy, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, University of Rijeka

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.2298/FID2001056P

Ključne reči:

epistemology of democracy, epistemic justification of democracy, social epistemology, virtue epistemology, epistemic value pluralism, the divison of epistemic labor

Apstrakt

The new and vibrant field of the epistemology of democracy, or the inquiry about the epistemic justification of democracy as a social system of procedures, institutions, and practices, as a cross-disciplinary endeavour, necessarily encounters both epistemologists and political philosophers. Despite possible complaints that this kind of discussion is either insufficiently epistemological or insufficiently political, my approach explicitly aims to harmonize the political and epistemic justification of democracy. In this article, I tackle some fundamental issues concerning the nature of the epistemic justification of democracy and the best theoretical framework for harmonizing political and epistemic values. I also inquire whether the proposed division of epistemic labour and the inclusion of experts can indeed improve the epistemic quality of decision-making without jeopardizing political justification. More specifically, I argue in favour of three theses. First, not only democratic procedures but also the outcomes of democracy, as a social system, need to be epistemically virtuous. Second, democracy’s epistemic virtues are more than just a tool for achieving political goals. Third, an appropriate division of epistemic labour has to overcome the limitations of both individual and collective intelligence.

Reference

Ahlstrom-Vij, Kristoffer (2012), “Why Deliberative Democracy is (Still) Untenable?”, Public Affairs Quarterly 26(3): 199–220.
Ahlstrom-Vij, Kristoffer (2013), “Why We Cannot Rely on Ourselves for Epistemic Improvement”, Philosophical Issues 23: 276–296.
Baccarini, Elvio (2020), “Public Reason and Reliability Democracy”, Filozofija i društvo / Philosophy and Society 31(1): 12–23.
Christiano, Thomas (2012), “Rational Deliberation between Experts and Citizens” in J. Mansbridge, Jane and John Parkinson (eds.), The Deliberative Systems: Deliberative Democracy at the Large Scale, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 27–51.
DeNicola, Daniel R. (2017), Understanding Ignorance. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Estulnd, David (2008a), “Epistemic Proceduralism and Democratic Authority” in R. Geenens and R. Tinnevelt (eds.), Does Truth Matter? Democracy and Public Space, Springer: Dordrecht, pp. 15–28.
—. (2008b), Democratic Authority: A Philosophical Framework. Princeton: Princeton Univeristy Press.
Foucault, Michel (1991) Discourse and Truth: The Problematization of Parrhesia.
J. Pearson (ed.), Evanston: Northwestern University Press.
Fricker, Miranda (2007), Epistemic Injustice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
—. (1998), “Rational Authority and Social Power: Towards a Truly Social Epistemology”, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 98(2): 159–177.
Gigone, Daniel and Hastie, Reid (1993), “The Common Knowledge Effect: Information Sharing and Group Judgment”, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 65: 959–974.
Goodin, Robert E. and Spiekerman, Kai (2018), An Epistemic Theory of Democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Goodin, Robert E. (2006), “The Benefits of Multiple Biased Observers”, Episteme 3(3): 166–174.
Goldman, Alvin. I. (2010), “Why Social Epistemology is Real Epistemology?”, in A. Haddock, A. Millar and D. Pritchard (eds.), Social Epistemology, pp. 1–28.
—. (2001), “Experts: Which Ones Should You Trust?”, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 63: 85–109.
—. (1999), Knowledge in a Social World. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Goldman, Alvin I. and Cox, James (1996), “Speech, Truth, and the Free Market for Ideas”, Legal Theory 2: 1–32.
Greco, John (2002), “Virtues in Epistemology”, in P. Moser (ed.), Oxford Handbook of Epistemology. New York: Oxford University Press.
Haddock, Adrian, Alan Millar and Duncan Pritchard (eds.) (2010), Social Epistemology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
—. (eds.) (2009), Epistemic Value. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hollis, Martin and Steven Lukes (eds.) (1982), Rationality and Relativism. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Janković, Ivana (2020), “Epistemic Feature of Democracy: The Role of Expert in Democratic Decision Making”, Filozofija i društvo / Philosophy and Society 31(1): 37–42.
Kitcher, Philip (2011), Science in a Democratic Society. Amherst, New York: Prometheus Books.
Kruger, Justin and Dunning, David (1999), “Unskilled and Unaware of It: How Difficulties in Recognizing One’s Own Incompetence Lead to Inflates Self-Assessments”, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 77(6): 1121–1134.
Kvanvig, Jonathan L., (2005), “Truth and the Epistemic Goal”, in Steup, Matthias and Ernest Sosa (eds.), Contemporary Debates in Epistemology, Malden, Mass.: Blackwell Publishing, pp. 285–295.
Lekić Barunčić, Kristina (2020), “Biological Citizenship in the Reliability Democracy: The Threat of the Neurodiversity Movement”, Filozofija i društvo / Philosophy and Society 31(1): 24–36.
Mill, John Stuart (1859), On Liberty. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
Mladenović, Ivan (2020), “Deliberative Epistemic Instrumentalism, or Something near enough”, Filozofija i društvo / Philosophy and Society 31(1): 3–11.
Nichols, Tom (2017), The Death of Expertise. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Peter, Fabienne (2016) “The Epistemic Circumstances of Democracy”, in Fricker, Miranda and Michael Brady (eds.), The Epistemic Life of Groups. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 133–149.
—. (2013), “The Procedural Epistemic Value of Deliberation”, Synthese 190(7): 1253–1266.
—. (2008), Democratic Legitimacy. New York: Routledge.
Prelec, Dražen, Sebastian H. Seung and John McCoy (2017), „A Solution to the Single-Question Crowd Wisdom Problem”, Nature 541(7638): 532–535.
Prijić Samaržija, Snježana (2018), Democracy and Truth: The Conflict Between Political and Epistemic Virtues. Milano, Udine: Mimesis International.
—. (2017), “The Role of Experts in a Democratic Decision-making Process”, Etica & Politica / Ethics & Politics 19(2): 229-246.
—. (2000), Društvo i spoznaja. Zagreb: Kruzak.
Roberts, Robert and Jay Wood (2007), Intellectual Virtues: An Essay in Regulative Epistemology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Rawls, John (2005), Political Liberalism. New York: Columbia University Press.
Rorty, Richard (1979), Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Sosa, Ernest (2007), A Virtue Epistemology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Sunstein, Cass (2006), Infotopia: How many Minds Produce Knowledge. New York: Oxford University Press.
Wolff, Jonathan (2019), „Method in Philosophy and Public Policy: Applied Philosophy versus Engaged Philosophy” in Lever, Annabelle and Andrei Poama (eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Ethics and Public Policy, New York, NY: Routledge, pp. 13–24.
Zagzebski, Linda (2012), Epistemic Authority: A Theory of Trust, Authority, and Autonomy of Belief. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
—. (1996), Virtues of the Mind: An Inquiry into the Nature of Virtue and the Ethical Foundations of Knowledge. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Zollman, Kevin (2010), “The Epistemic Benefit of Transient Diversity”, Erkenntnis 72(1): 17–35.
Zubčić, Marko-Luka (2020), “Social Epistemic Inequalities, Redundancy and Epistemic Reliability in Governance”, Filozofija i društvo / Philosophy and Society 31(1): 43–55.