Hegel’s Justification of the Human Right to Non-Domination
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.2298/FID1703579WKljučne reči:
Hegel, human rights, non-domination, Pettit, republicanism, justification, recognitionApstrakt
‘Hegel’ and ‘human rights’ are rarely conjoined, and the designation ‘human rights’ appears rarely in his works. Indeed, Hegel has been criticised for omitting civil and political rights all together. My surmise is that readers have looked for a modern Decalogue, and have neglected how Hegel justifies his views, and hence just what views he does justify. Philip Pettit (1997) has refocused attention on republican liberty. Hegel and I agree with Pettit that republican liberty is a supremely important value, but appealing to its value, or justifying it by appeal to reflective equilibrium, are insufficient both in theory and in practice. By reconstructing Kant’s Critical methodology and explicating the social character of rational justification in non-formal domains, Hegel shows that the republican right to non-domination is constitutive of the equally republican right to justification (Forst 2007) – both of which are necessary requirements for sufficient rational
justification in all non-formal domains, including both claims to rights or imputations of duties or responsibilities. That is the direct moral, political and juridical implication of Hegel’s analysis of mutual recognition, and its fundamental, constitutive role in rational justification. Specific corollaries to the fundamental republican right to non-domination must be determined by considering what forms of illicit domination are possible or probable within any specific society, in view of its social, political and economic structures and functioning.
Reference
Alston, William, 1989a. Epistemic Justification: Essays in Epistemology. Ithaca, NY, Cornell University Press.
Austin, J. L., 1946. ‘Other Minds’. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Supplementary Volume 20:173–187; rpt. in: idem. (1979), 76–116.
———, 1979. J. O. Urmson, ed., Philosophical Papers, 3d ed. Oxford, The Clarendon Press.
Becker, Lawrence, 1986. Reciprocity. London, Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Bell, David, 1979. Frege’s Theory of Judgment. Oxford, The Clarendon Press.
Berolzheimer, Fritz, 1912. The World’s Legal Philosophies. Boston, Boston Book Co.
Beyleveld, Deryck, and Shaun Pattinson, 2000. ‘Precautionary Reasoning as a Link to Moral Action’. In: M. Boylan, ed., Medical Ethics (Upper Saddle River, NJ, Prentice-Hall), 39–53.
———, 2010. ‘Defending Moral Precaution as a Solution to the Problem of Other Minds: A Reply to Holm and Coggon’. Ratio Juris 23.2:258–273.
Bonjour, Laurence, 1997. ‘Haack on Justification and Experience’. Synthese 112: 13–23.
Boulter, Stephen, 2011. ‘The Mediaeval Origin of Conceivability Arguments’. Metaphilosophy 42.5:617– 641.
Brentano, Franz, 1874. Psychologie vom empirischen Standpunkt, 2 vols. Leipzig, Duncker und Humblot.
Buchanan, James, and Richard Wagner, 1977. Democracy in Deficit: The Political Legacy of Lord Keynes. New York, Academic Press; rpt. Indianapolis, IN: The Liberty Fund, 2000.
Burge, Tyler, 2010. Origins of Objectivity. Oxford, The Clarendon Press.
Caird, Edward, 1889. The Critical Philosophy of Immanuel Kant, 2 vols. Glasgow, Maclehose.
Carnap, Rudolf, 1950a. Logical Foundations of Probability. Chicago, University of Chicago Press.
———, 1950b. ‘Empiricism, Semantics, and Ontology’. Revue International de Philosophie 4:20–40; 2nd rev. ed. in: Carnap (1956), 205–221.
———, 1956. Meaning and Necessity, 2nd rev. ed. Chicago, University of Chicago Press.
Carroll, Lewis, 1895. ‘What the Tortise Said to Achilles’. Mind 4:278-280.
Chisholm, Roderick, 1982. The Foundations of Knowing. Minneapolis, University of Minnesota Press.
Conklin, William, 2008. Hegel’s Laws: The Legitimacy of a Modern Legal Order. Stanford University Press.
Curren, Randall, and Ellen Metzger, 2017. Living Well Now and in the Future: Why Sustainability Matters. Cambridge, Mass., MIT Press.
Daniels, Norman, 1996. Justice and Justification: Reflective Equilibrium in Theory and Practice. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
Dewey, John, 1938. ‘Means and Ends: Their Interdependence, and Leon Trotsky’s Essay, “Their Morals and Ours”’. New International 4 (August 1938):232–233; rpt. in: J.A. Boydson, ed., The Later Works of John Dewey (Carbondale, Ill.: Southern Illinois University Press, 1988), 13:349–354.
Erickson, Paul, Judy Klein, Lorraine Daston, Rebecca Lemov, Thomas Sturm and Michael Gordin, 2013. How Reason almost lost its Mind: The Strange Career of Cold War Rationality. Chicago, University of Chicago Press.
Falkenheim, Hugo, 1909. „Eine unbekannte politische Druckschrift Hegels“. Preussische Jahrbücher 138.11:193–220; rpt. in: H. Schneider & N. Waszek, eds., Hegel in der Schweiz (1793–1796) (Frankfurt am Main: Lang, 1997), 261–286.
Forst, Rainer, 2007. Recht auf Rechtfertigung. Frankfurt am Main, Suhrkamp; Engl. tr.: idem. (2012).
———, 2011. Kritik der Rechtfertigungsverhältnisse. Berlin, Suhrkamp; Engl. tr.: idem. (2014).
———, 2012. J. Flynn, tr., The Right to Justification. New York, Columbia University Press.
———, 2014. C. Cronin, tr., Justification and Critique: Towards a Critical Theory of Politics. Cambridge, Polity.
Frege, Gottlieb, 1879. Begriffschrift, eine der arithemetischen Nachgebildete Formelsprache des reinen Denkens. Halle (Saale), Nebert.
Gareis, Karl, 1911. Introduction to the Science of Law: Systematic Survey of the Law and Principles of Legal Study. Boston, The Boston Book Company.
Goodman, Nelson, 1955. Fact, Fiction, and Forecast, 4th ed. 1983. Cambridge, Mass., Harvard University Press.
Griffin, James, 1996. Value Judgment: Improving our Ethical Beliefs. Oxford, Clarendon Press.
Hegel, G.W.F. 1986–2013. Gesammelte Werke, 31 vols. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, with the Hegel-Kommission der Rheinisch-Westfälischen Akademie der Wissenschaften and the Hegel-Archiv der Ruhr-Universität Bochum. Hamburg, Meiner; cited as ‘GW’ by volume:page.line numbers. Individual works are indicated by their German initials. Volumes 23–31 contain lecture manuscripts or transcripts; these are cited as ‘Vor.’ by volume:page numbers.
———, 1798a. [Anon.] Aus den vertraulichen Briefen über das vormalige staatsrechliche Verhaltnis des Waadtlandes (Pays de Vaud) zur Stadt Bern. Frankfurt am Mein, Jäger. GW 2:387–582; Engl. tr. (exerpt) in: idem. (2002), 123–133.
———, 1798b. (Ms. Fragment) „Daß die Magistrate von den Bürgern gewählt werden müssen“/ „Über die neuesten inneren Verhältnisse Württembergs, besonders über die Gebrechen der Magistratsverfassung“. GW 2:99–110; Engl. tr. in: idem. (1964), 243–245; and idem. (1999), 1–5.
———, 1799–1803. „Die Verfaßung Deutschlands“ („Sollte das politische Resultat [...]“). GW 5:1–126; Engl. tr. in: idem. (1964), 143–242; and idem. (1999), 6–100.
———, 1807. Die Phänomenologie des Geistes. Bamberg & Würzburg, Goephard; W. Bonsiepen & R. Heede, eds., GW 9.
———, 1817. „Verhandlungen in der Versammlung der Landstände des Königreichs Württemberg im Jahr 1815 und 1816“. Heidelbergische Jahrbücher der Literatur 10.66–68:1041–1088, 10.73–77:1153– 1232; GW 15:30–125; Engl. tr. in: idem. (1964), 246–294; and idem. (2009), 32–136.
———, 1821. Grundlinien der Philosophie des Rechts oder Naturrecht und Staatswissenschaft im Grundrisse. Berlin, Nicolai; abbreviated ‘Rph’, cited by main sections (§) or by Hegel’s published Remarks (§nR); GW 14.
———, 1831. „Über die englische Reformbill“. Allgemeine preußische Staats-Zeitung, 1831, Nr. 115–116, 118; second half printed and distributed privately; published complete in: idem. (1832–45), 17.2 (1835):425–470; GW 16:323–404; Engl. tr. in: idem. (1964), 143–242; and in: idem. (1999), 234–270.
———, 1832–1845. Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel’s Werke. Vollständige Ausgabe durch einen Verein von Freunden des Verewigten (Berlin, Duncker und Humblot), 19 vols.
———, 1964. Z.A. Pelczynski, ed., T.M. Knox, tr., Hegel’s Political Writings. Oxford, The Clarendon Press.
———, 1974. K.-H. Ilting, ed., Vorlesungen über Rechtsphilosophie 1818–1831, 4 vols. Stuttgart-Bad-Cannstadt, frommann-holzboog.
———, 1985. K-H Ilting, ed., Die Philosophie des Rechts. Die Mitschriften Wannenmann (Heidelberg 1817/18) und Homeyer (Berlin 1818/19). Stuttgart, Klett-Cotta.
———, 1999. L. Dickey, ed., H.B. Nisbet, tr., Political Writings. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
———, 2002. J. Stewart, ed. & tr., Miscellaneous Writings of G.W.F. Hegel. Evanston, Ill., Northwestern University Press.
———, 2008. Outlines of the Philosophy of Right. S. Houlgate, ed., T.M. Knox, tr., Oxford, Oxford University Press; abbreviated ‘Rph’, cited by main sections (§), by Hegel’s published Remarks (§nR) or very occasionally by lecture notes (§nZ) (‘Z’ for ,Zusatz’); GW 14.
———, 2009a. K. Worm, ed., Hegels Werk im Kontext, 5th Release. Berlin, InfoSoftWare.
———, 2009b. B. Bowman and A. Speight, eds. & trs., Heidelberg Writings: Journal Publications. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
———, forthcoming (ms. 2013). The Phenomenology of Spirit, T. Pinkard, tr.. Draft bi-lingual translation in PDF format; cited by paragraph (¶) numbers provided by the translator corresponding to GW 9.
Humboldt, Wilhelm von, 1851, Ideen zu einem Versuch, die Gränzen der Wirksamkeit des Staats zu bestimmen. Breslau, Trewendt; rpt. in: A. Leitzmann, ed., Wilhelm von Humboldts gesammelte Shriften (Berlin: Behr, 1903), 1:97–254.
———, 1969. J.W. Burrow, ed., J. Coulthard, tr. (rev.), The Limits of State Action. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
Jones, Charles O., 1975. Clean Air: The Policies and Politics of Pollution Control. Pittsburgh, University of Pittsburgh Press.
Kaufmann, Walter, 1951. ‘The Hegel Myth and its Method’. Philosophical Review 60.4:459–486.
Levin, Michael, 2004. Mill on Civilization and Barbarism. London, Routledge.
Lipps, Theodore, 1901. Das Selbstbewusstsein: Empfindung und Gefühl. Wiesbaden, Bergmann.
———, 1912. Grundzüge der Logik. Leipzig, Voss.
———, 1913. Psychologische Untersuchungen, 2 vols. Leipzig, Engelmann.
Miller, Alice, 1981. Prisoners of Childhood. New York, Basic Books.
———, 1983. For your own Good: Hidden Cruelty in Child-rearing and the Roots of Violence. New York, Farrar, Straus, Giroux.
———, 1984. Thou Shalt not be Aware: Society’s Betrayal of the Child. New York, Farrar, Straus, Giroux.
———, 2001. The Truth will set you Free: Overcoming Emotional Blindness and Finding your true Adult Self. New York, Basic Books.
———, 2005. The Body never Lies: The Lingering Effects of Cruel Parenting. New York, W.W. Norton.
Neuhouser, Frederick, 2000. The Foundations of Hegel’s Social Theory: Actualizing Freedom. Cambridge, Mass., Harvard University Press
Olsen, Mancur, 1965. The Logic of Collective Action. Cambridge, Mass., Harvard University Press.
O’Neill, Ornoa, 2003. ‘Constructivism in Rawls and Kant’. In: S. Freeman, ed., The Cambridge Companion to Rawls (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press), 347–367.
Pattaro, Enrico, 2005. The Law and the Right. Dordrecht, Springer; vol. 1 in: idem., editor-in-chief, A Treatise of Legal Philosophy and General Jurisprudence (2005–2016), 13 vols.
Perlmutter, Martin, 1998. ‘Moral Intuitions and Philosophical Method’. In: K. R. Westphal, ed., Pragmatism, Reason, and Norms (New York, Fordham University Press), 203–18.
Pettit, Philip, 1997. Republicanism: A Theory of Freedom and Government. Oxford, The Clarendon Press.
———, 2001. A Theory of Freedom: From the Psychology to the Politics of Agency. Oxford, Oxford University Press.
Piché, David, 1999. La Condamnation parisienne de 1277. Paris, Vrin.
Popovski, Vesselin, Gregory Reichberg and Nicholas Turner, eds., 2009. World Religions and Norms of War. Tokyo, New York, Paris, United Nations University Press.
Porter, Theodore, 1995. Trust in Numbers: The Pursuit of Objectivity in Science and Public Life. Princeton, Princeton University Press.
Powers, Lawrence, 1978. ‘Knowledge by Deduction’. Philosophical Review 87.3:337–371.
Rawls, John, 1971. A Theory of Justice, 1st ed. Cambridge, Mass., Harvard University Press.
Reidy, David, 1999. ‘Rawls’s Idea(l) of Public Reason’. Polis 6:93–113.
———, 2000. ‘Rawls’s Wide View of Public Reason: Not Wide Enough’. Res Publica 6:49–72.
Runzo, Joseph, Nancy M. Martin, and Arvind Sharma, eds., 2003. Human Rights and Responsibilities in the World Religions. Oxford, Oneworld.
Quine, W. V. O., 1936. ‘Truth by Convention’. In: O. H. Lee, ed., Philosophical Essays for A. N. Whitehead (New York, Longman’s), 90–124; rtp. in: idem. (1976), 77–106.
———, 1976. The Ways of Paradox and Other Essays, 2nd rev. ed. Cambridge, Mass., Harvard University Press.
Shklar, Judith, 1976. Freedom and Independence: A Study of the Political Ideas of Hegel’s Phenomenology of Mind. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
Stewart, Jon, ed., 1996. The Hegel Myths and Legends. Evanston, Ill., Northwestern University Press.
Tempier, Étienne, 1277. ‘Propositions condamnées par Étienn Tempier, évêque de Paris’. Rpt. in: H. Denifle, ed., Chartularium universitatis parisiensis (Paris, 1889), 1:543–4;
also in: P. Mandonnett, Siger de Brabant et l’averroïsme latin au XIIIme siècle (Louvain, 1911), 2:175–191; critical ed. in: Piché (1999); English tr. by E. L. Fortin and P. D. O’Neill, in: R. Lerner and M. Mahdi, eds., Medieval Political Philosophy: A Sourcebook (New York: Free Press, 1963), 335–54.
Thomas, Alan, 2017. Republic of Equals: Predistribution & Property-Owning Democracy. Oxford, Oxford University Press.
Truman, David B., 1951. The Governmental Process: Political Interests and Public Opinion. New York, Knopf.
Wallace, James, 2008. Norms and Practices. Ithaca, NY, Cornell University Press.
Waismann, Frederick. 1945. ‘Verifiability’. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Supplementary Volume 19:101–164; rpt. in: A. Flew, ed., Logic and Language: First and Second Series. (New York: Anchor, 1965), 122–151.
Watson, John, 1881. Kant and his English Critics. A Comparison of Critical and Empirical Philosophy. Glasgow, Maclehose; London and New York, Macmillan.
Weber, Max, 1922. Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft. (Grundriß der Sozialökonomik, III. Abt.) Tübingen, J.C.B. Mohr (Paul Siebeck).
Westphal, Kenneth R.,
———, 2000. ‘Hegel’s Internal Critique of Naïve Realism’. Journal of Philosophical Research 25:173–229.
———, 2002–03. „Analytischer Gehalt und zeitgenössische Bedeutung von Hegels Kritik des unmittelbaren Wissens“. Jahrbuch für Hegel-Forschungen 8/9:129–143.
———, 2004. Kant’s Transcendental Proof of Realism. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
———, 2010. ‘Hegel, Russell & the Foundations of Philosophy’. In: A. Nuzzo, ed., Hegel and the Analytical Tradition (New York, Continuum), 174–194.
———, 2012. ‘Norm Acquisition, Rational Judgment & Moral Particularism’. Theory & Research in Education 10.1:3–25; doi: 10.1177/1477878512437477.
———, 2013a. ‘Natural Law, Social Contract and Moral Objectivity: Rousseau’s Natural Law Constructivism’. Jurisprudence 4.1:48–75.
———, 2013b. ‘Kant’s Cognitive Semantics, Newton’s Rule Four of Natural Philosophy & Scientific Realism Today’. In: Kant and Contemporary Theory of Knowledge, Kant Yearbook 5:127–168.
———, 2015. ‘Conventionalism & the Impoverishment of the Space of Reasons: Carnap, Quine & Sellars’. Journal for the History of Analytic Philosophy 3.8:1–66; doi: 10.15173/jhap.v3i8.42.
———, 2016a. How Hume and Kant Reconstruct Natural Law: Justifying Strict Objectivity without Debating Moral Realism. Oxford, The Clarendon Press.
———, 2016b. „Hegel, Naturrecht und Moralkonstruktivismus“. Jahrbuch für Recht und Ethik/Annual Review of Law and Ethics 26:000–000.
———, 2016c. ‘The Centrality of Public Reason in Hegel’s Moral Philosophy’. In: P.N. Turner & G. Gaus, eds., Public Reason in the History of Political Philosophy: Classical Sources & Contemporary Commentaries (London & New York, Routledge), 330-353.
———, 2016d. ‘Hegel’s Natural Law Constructivism: Progressive in Principle & in Practice’. In: S. Stein & T. Brooks, eds., Hegel’s Political Philosophy: On the Normative Significance of Method and System (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 253-279.
———, 2016e. ‘Back to the 3 R’s: Rights, Responsibilities & Reasoning’. SATS – Northern European Journal of Philosophy 17.1:21–60; doi: 10.1515/sats-2016-0008.
———, 2016f. ‘Kant, Aristotle & our Fidelity to Reason’. Studi Kantiani 29:83–102.
———, 2016g. ‘Mind, Language & Behaviour: Kant’s Critical Cautions contra Contemporary Internalism & Causal Naturalism’. In: S. Babür, ed., Felsefede Yöntem/Method in Philosophy, special issue of Yeditepe’de Felsefe/Philosophy at Yeditepe (İstanbul, Yeditepe Üniversitesi Press) 10:102–149.
———, 2016h. ‘How Kant Justifies Freedom of Agency without Transcendental Idealism’. European Journal of Philosophy DOI: 10.1111/ejop.12264.
———, 2017. Grounds of Pragmatic Realism: Hegel’s Internal Critique and Transformation of Kant’s Critical Philosophy. Leiden, Brill.
———, forthcoming. Normative Justification, Natural Law & Kant’s Constructivism in Hegel’s Moral Philosophy.
Will, Frederick L., 1988. Beyond Deduction: Ampliative Aspects of Philosophical Reason. London, Routledge.
Williams, Michael, 1988. ‘Skepticism without Theory’. The Review of Metaphysics 41.3:547–588.
Wittgenstein, Ludwig, 1958. Philosophische Untersuchungen/Philosophical Investitations, 2nd ed.; G.E.M. Anscombe, tr. Oxford, Basil Blackwell.
Wolff, Michael, 2009. Abhandlungen über die Prinzipien der Logik, 2nd rev. ed. Frankfurt am Main, Klostermann.
Wundt, Wilhelm, 1907. System der Philosophie, 3 vols., 3d rev. ed. Leipzig, Engelmann.
Austin, J. L., 1946. ‘Other Minds’. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Supplementary Volume 20:173–187; rpt. in: idem. (1979), 76–116.
———, 1979. J. O. Urmson, ed., Philosophical Papers, 3d ed. Oxford, The Clarendon Press.
Becker, Lawrence, 1986. Reciprocity. London, Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Bell, David, 1979. Frege’s Theory of Judgment. Oxford, The Clarendon Press.
Berolzheimer, Fritz, 1912. The World’s Legal Philosophies. Boston, Boston Book Co.
Beyleveld, Deryck, and Shaun Pattinson, 2000. ‘Precautionary Reasoning as a Link to Moral Action’. In: M. Boylan, ed., Medical Ethics (Upper Saddle River, NJ, Prentice-Hall), 39–53.
———, 2010. ‘Defending Moral Precaution as a Solution to the Problem of Other Minds: A Reply to Holm and Coggon’. Ratio Juris 23.2:258–273.
Bonjour, Laurence, 1997. ‘Haack on Justification and Experience’. Synthese 112: 13–23.
Boulter, Stephen, 2011. ‘The Mediaeval Origin of Conceivability Arguments’. Metaphilosophy 42.5:617– 641.
Brentano, Franz, 1874. Psychologie vom empirischen Standpunkt, 2 vols. Leipzig, Duncker und Humblot.
Buchanan, James, and Richard Wagner, 1977. Democracy in Deficit: The Political Legacy of Lord Keynes. New York, Academic Press; rpt. Indianapolis, IN: The Liberty Fund, 2000.
Burge, Tyler, 2010. Origins of Objectivity. Oxford, The Clarendon Press.
Caird, Edward, 1889. The Critical Philosophy of Immanuel Kant, 2 vols. Glasgow, Maclehose.
Carnap, Rudolf, 1950a. Logical Foundations of Probability. Chicago, University of Chicago Press.
———, 1950b. ‘Empiricism, Semantics, and Ontology’. Revue International de Philosophie 4:20–40; 2nd rev. ed. in: Carnap (1956), 205–221.
———, 1956. Meaning and Necessity, 2nd rev. ed. Chicago, University of Chicago Press.
Carroll, Lewis, 1895. ‘What the Tortise Said to Achilles’. Mind 4:278-280.
Chisholm, Roderick, 1982. The Foundations of Knowing. Minneapolis, University of Minnesota Press.
Conklin, William, 2008. Hegel’s Laws: The Legitimacy of a Modern Legal Order. Stanford University Press.
Curren, Randall, and Ellen Metzger, 2017. Living Well Now and in the Future: Why Sustainability Matters. Cambridge, Mass., MIT Press.
Daniels, Norman, 1996. Justice and Justification: Reflective Equilibrium in Theory and Practice. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
Dewey, John, 1938. ‘Means and Ends: Their Interdependence, and Leon Trotsky’s Essay, “Their Morals and Ours”’. New International 4 (August 1938):232–233; rpt. in: J.A. Boydson, ed., The Later Works of John Dewey (Carbondale, Ill.: Southern Illinois University Press, 1988), 13:349–354.
Erickson, Paul, Judy Klein, Lorraine Daston, Rebecca Lemov, Thomas Sturm and Michael Gordin, 2013. How Reason almost lost its Mind: The Strange Career of Cold War Rationality. Chicago, University of Chicago Press.
Falkenheim, Hugo, 1909. „Eine unbekannte politische Druckschrift Hegels“. Preussische Jahrbücher 138.11:193–220; rpt. in: H. Schneider & N. Waszek, eds., Hegel in der Schweiz (1793–1796) (Frankfurt am Main: Lang, 1997), 261–286.
Forst, Rainer, 2007. Recht auf Rechtfertigung. Frankfurt am Main, Suhrkamp; Engl. tr.: idem. (2012).
———, 2011. Kritik der Rechtfertigungsverhältnisse. Berlin, Suhrkamp; Engl. tr.: idem. (2014).
———, 2012. J. Flynn, tr., The Right to Justification. New York, Columbia University Press.
———, 2014. C. Cronin, tr., Justification and Critique: Towards a Critical Theory of Politics. Cambridge, Polity.
Frege, Gottlieb, 1879. Begriffschrift, eine der arithemetischen Nachgebildete Formelsprache des reinen Denkens. Halle (Saale), Nebert.
Gareis, Karl, 1911. Introduction to the Science of Law: Systematic Survey of the Law and Principles of Legal Study. Boston, The Boston Book Company.
Goodman, Nelson, 1955. Fact, Fiction, and Forecast, 4th ed. 1983. Cambridge, Mass., Harvard University Press.
Griffin, James, 1996. Value Judgment: Improving our Ethical Beliefs. Oxford, Clarendon Press.
Hegel, G.W.F. 1986–2013. Gesammelte Werke, 31 vols. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, with the Hegel-Kommission der Rheinisch-Westfälischen Akademie der Wissenschaften and the Hegel-Archiv der Ruhr-Universität Bochum. Hamburg, Meiner; cited as ‘GW’ by volume:page.line numbers. Individual works are indicated by their German initials. Volumes 23–31 contain lecture manuscripts or transcripts; these are cited as ‘Vor.’ by volume:page numbers.
———, 1798a. [Anon.] Aus den vertraulichen Briefen über das vormalige staatsrechliche Verhaltnis des Waadtlandes (Pays de Vaud) zur Stadt Bern. Frankfurt am Mein, Jäger. GW 2:387–582; Engl. tr. (exerpt) in: idem. (2002), 123–133.
———, 1798b. (Ms. Fragment) „Daß die Magistrate von den Bürgern gewählt werden müssen“/ „Über die neuesten inneren Verhältnisse Württembergs, besonders über die Gebrechen der Magistratsverfassung“. GW 2:99–110; Engl. tr. in: idem. (1964), 243–245; and idem. (1999), 1–5.
———, 1799–1803. „Die Verfaßung Deutschlands“ („Sollte das politische Resultat [...]“). GW 5:1–126; Engl. tr. in: idem. (1964), 143–242; and idem. (1999), 6–100.
———, 1807. Die Phänomenologie des Geistes. Bamberg & Würzburg, Goephard; W. Bonsiepen & R. Heede, eds., GW 9.
———, 1817. „Verhandlungen in der Versammlung der Landstände des Königreichs Württemberg im Jahr 1815 und 1816“. Heidelbergische Jahrbücher der Literatur 10.66–68:1041–1088, 10.73–77:1153– 1232; GW 15:30–125; Engl. tr. in: idem. (1964), 246–294; and idem. (2009), 32–136.
———, 1821. Grundlinien der Philosophie des Rechts oder Naturrecht und Staatswissenschaft im Grundrisse. Berlin, Nicolai; abbreviated ‘Rph’, cited by main sections (§) or by Hegel’s published Remarks (§nR); GW 14.
———, 1831. „Über die englische Reformbill“. Allgemeine preußische Staats-Zeitung, 1831, Nr. 115–116, 118; second half printed and distributed privately; published complete in: idem. (1832–45), 17.2 (1835):425–470; GW 16:323–404; Engl. tr. in: idem. (1964), 143–242; and in: idem. (1999), 234–270.
———, 1832–1845. Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel’s Werke. Vollständige Ausgabe durch einen Verein von Freunden des Verewigten (Berlin, Duncker und Humblot), 19 vols.
———, 1964. Z.A. Pelczynski, ed., T.M. Knox, tr., Hegel’s Political Writings. Oxford, The Clarendon Press.
———, 1974. K.-H. Ilting, ed., Vorlesungen über Rechtsphilosophie 1818–1831, 4 vols. Stuttgart-Bad-Cannstadt, frommann-holzboog.
———, 1985. K-H Ilting, ed., Die Philosophie des Rechts. Die Mitschriften Wannenmann (Heidelberg 1817/18) und Homeyer (Berlin 1818/19). Stuttgart, Klett-Cotta.
———, 1999. L. Dickey, ed., H.B. Nisbet, tr., Political Writings. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
———, 2002. J. Stewart, ed. & tr., Miscellaneous Writings of G.W.F. Hegel. Evanston, Ill., Northwestern University Press.
———, 2008. Outlines of the Philosophy of Right. S. Houlgate, ed., T.M. Knox, tr., Oxford, Oxford University Press; abbreviated ‘Rph’, cited by main sections (§), by Hegel’s published Remarks (§nR) or very occasionally by lecture notes (§nZ) (‘Z’ for ,Zusatz’); GW 14.
———, 2009a. K. Worm, ed., Hegels Werk im Kontext, 5th Release. Berlin, InfoSoftWare.
———, 2009b. B. Bowman and A. Speight, eds. & trs., Heidelberg Writings: Journal Publications. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
———, forthcoming (ms. 2013). The Phenomenology of Spirit, T. Pinkard, tr.. Draft bi-lingual translation in PDF format; cited by paragraph (¶) numbers provided by the translator corresponding to GW 9.
Humboldt, Wilhelm von, 1851, Ideen zu einem Versuch, die Gränzen der Wirksamkeit des Staats zu bestimmen. Breslau, Trewendt; rpt. in: A. Leitzmann, ed., Wilhelm von Humboldts gesammelte Shriften (Berlin: Behr, 1903), 1:97–254.
———, 1969. J.W. Burrow, ed., J. Coulthard, tr. (rev.), The Limits of State Action. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
Jones, Charles O., 1975. Clean Air: The Policies and Politics of Pollution Control. Pittsburgh, University of Pittsburgh Press.
Kaufmann, Walter, 1951. ‘The Hegel Myth and its Method’. Philosophical Review 60.4:459–486.
Levin, Michael, 2004. Mill on Civilization and Barbarism. London, Routledge.
Lipps, Theodore, 1901. Das Selbstbewusstsein: Empfindung und Gefühl. Wiesbaden, Bergmann.
———, 1912. Grundzüge der Logik. Leipzig, Voss.
———, 1913. Psychologische Untersuchungen, 2 vols. Leipzig, Engelmann.
Miller, Alice, 1981. Prisoners of Childhood. New York, Basic Books.
———, 1983. For your own Good: Hidden Cruelty in Child-rearing and the Roots of Violence. New York, Farrar, Straus, Giroux.
———, 1984. Thou Shalt not be Aware: Society’s Betrayal of the Child. New York, Farrar, Straus, Giroux.
———, 2001. The Truth will set you Free: Overcoming Emotional Blindness and Finding your true Adult Self. New York, Basic Books.
———, 2005. The Body never Lies: The Lingering Effects of Cruel Parenting. New York, W.W. Norton.
Neuhouser, Frederick, 2000. The Foundations of Hegel’s Social Theory: Actualizing Freedom. Cambridge, Mass., Harvard University Press
Olsen, Mancur, 1965. The Logic of Collective Action. Cambridge, Mass., Harvard University Press.
O’Neill, Ornoa, 2003. ‘Constructivism in Rawls and Kant’. In: S. Freeman, ed., The Cambridge Companion to Rawls (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press), 347–367.
Pattaro, Enrico, 2005. The Law and the Right. Dordrecht, Springer; vol. 1 in: idem., editor-in-chief, A Treatise of Legal Philosophy and General Jurisprudence (2005–2016), 13 vols.
Perlmutter, Martin, 1998. ‘Moral Intuitions and Philosophical Method’. In: K. R. Westphal, ed., Pragmatism, Reason, and Norms (New York, Fordham University Press), 203–18.
Pettit, Philip, 1997. Republicanism: A Theory of Freedom and Government. Oxford, The Clarendon Press.
———, 2001. A Theory of Freedom: From the Psychology to the Politics of Agency. Oxford, Oxford University Press.
Piché, David, 1999. La Condamnation parisienne de 1277. Paris, Vrin.
Popovski, Vesselin, Gregory Reichberg and Nicholas Turner, eds., 2009. World Religions and Norms of War. Tokyo, New York, Paris, United Nations University Press.
Porter, Theodore, 1995. Trust in Numbers: The Pursuit of Objectivity in Science and Public Life. Princeton, Princeton University Press.
Powers, Lawrence, 1978. ‘Knowledge by Deduction’. Philosophical Review 87.3:337–371.
Rawls, John, 1971. A Theory of Justice, 1st ed. Cambridge, Mass., Harvard University Press.
Reidy, David, 1999. ‘Rawls’s Idea(l) of Public Reason’. Polis 6:93–113.
———, 2000. ‘Rawls’s Wide View of Public Reason: Not Wide Enough’. Res Publica 6:49–72.
Runzo, Joseph, Nancy M. Martin, and Arvind Sharma, eds., 2003. Human Rights and Responsibilities in the World Religions. Oxford, Oneworld.
Quine, W. V. O., 1936. ‘Truth by Convention’. In: O. H. Lee, ed., Philosophical Essays for A. N. Whitehead (New York, Longman’s), 90–124; rtp. in: idem. (1976), 77–106.
———, 1976. The Ways of Paradox and Other Essays, 2nd rev. ed. Cambridge, Mass., Harvard University Press.
Shklar, Judith, 1976. Freedom and Independence: A Study of the Political Ideas of Hegel’s Phenomenology of Mind. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
Stewart, Jon, ed., 1996. The Hegel Myths and Legends. Evanston, Ill., Northwestern University Press.
Tempier, Étienne, 1277. ‘Propositions condamnées par Étienn Tempier, évêque de Paris’. Rpt. in: H. Denifle, ed., Chartularium universitatis parisiensis (Paris, 1889), 1:543–4;
also in: P. Mandonnett, Siger de Brabant et l’averroïsme latin au XIIIme siècle (Louvain, 1911), 2:175–191; critical ed. in: Piché (1999); English tr. by E. L. Fortin and P. D. O’Neill, in: R. Lerner and M. Mahdi, eds., Medieval Political Philosophy: A Sourcebook (New York: Free Press, 1963), 335–54.
Thomas, Alan, 2017. Republic of Equals: Predistribution & Property-Owning Democracy. Oxford, Oxford University Press.
Truman, David B., 1951. The Governmental Process: Political Interests and Public Opinion. New York, Knopf.
Wallace, James, 2008. Norms and Practices. Ithaca, NY, Cornell University Press.
Waismann, Frederick. 1945. ‘Verifiability’. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Supplementary Volume 19:101–164; rpt. in: A. Flew, ed., Logic and Language: First and Second Series. (New York: Anchor, 1965), 122–151.
Watson, John, 1881. Kant and his English Critics. A Comparison of Critical and Empirical Philosophy. Glasgow, Maclehose; London and New York, Macmillan.
Weber, Max, 1922. Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft. (Grundriß der Sozialökonomik, III. Abt.) Tübingen, J.C.B. Mohr (Paul Siebeck).
Westphal, Kenneth R.,
———, 2000. ‘Hegel’s Internal Critique of Naïve Realism’. Journal of Philosophical Research 25:173–229.
———, 2002–03. „Analytischer Gehalt und zeitgenössische Bedeutung von Hegels Kritik des unmittelbaren Wissens“. Jahrbuch für Hegel-Forschungen 8/9:129–143.
———, 2004. Kant’s Transcendental Proof of Realism. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
———, 2010. ‘Hegel, Russell & the Foundations of Philosophy’. In: A. Nuzzo, ed., Hegel and the Analytical Tradition (New York, Continuum), 174–194.
———, 2012. ‘Norm Acquisition, Rational Judgment & Moral Particularism’. Theory & Research in Education 10.1:3–25; doi: 10.1177/1477878512437477.
———, 2013a. ‘Natural Law, Social Contract and Moral Objectivity: Rousseau’s Natural Law Constructivism’. Jurisprudence 4.1:48–75.
———, 2013b. ‘Kant’s Cognitive Semantics, Newton’s Rule Four of Natural Philosophy & Scientific Realism Today’. In: Kant and Contemporary Theory of Knowledge, Kant Yearbook 5:127–168.
———, 2015. ‘Conventionalism & the Impoverishment of the Space of Reasons: Carnap, Quine & Sellars’. Journal for the History of Analytic Philosophy 3.8:1–66; doi: 10.15173/jhap.v3i8.42.
———, 2016a. How Hume and Kant Reconstruct Natural Law: Justifying Strict Objectivity without Debating Moral Realism. Oxford, The Clarendon Press.
———, 2016b. „Hegel, Naturrecht und Moralkonstruktivismus“. Jahrbuch für Recht und Ethik/Annual Review of Law and Ethics 26:000–000.
———, 2016c. ‘The Centrality of Public Reason in Hegel’s Moral Philosophy’. In: P.N. Turner & G. Gaus, eds., Public Reason in the History of Political Philosophy: Classical Sources & Contemporary Commentaries (London & New York, Routledge), 330-353.
———, 2016d. ‘Hegel’s Natural Law Constructivism: Progressive in Principle & in Practice’. In: S. Stein & T. Brooks, eds., Hegel’s Political Philosophy: On the Normative Significance of Method and System (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 253-279.
———, 2016e. ‘Back to the 3 R’s: Rights, Responsibilities & Reasoning’. SATS – Northern European Journal of Philosophy 17.1:21–60; doi: 10.1515/sats-2016-0008.
———, 2016f. ‘Kant, Aristotle & our Fidelity to Reason’. Studi Kantiani 29:83–102.
———, 2016g. ‘Mind, Language & Behaviour: Kant’s Critical Cautions contra Contemporary Internalism & Causal Naturalism’. In: S. Babür, ed., Felsefede Yöntem/Method in Philosophy, special issue of Yeditepe’de Felsefe/Philosophy at Yeditepe (İstanbul, Yeditepe Üniversitesi Press) 10:102–149.
———, 2016h. ‘How Kant Justifies Freedom of Agency without Transcendental Idealism’. European Journal of Philosophy DOI: 10.1111/ejop.12264.
———, 2017. Grounds of Pragmatic Realism: Hegel’s Internal Critique and Transformation of Kant’s Critical Philosophy. Leiden, Brill.
———, forthcoming. Normative Justification, Natural Law & Kant’s Constructivism in Hegel’s Moral Philosophy.
Will, Frederick L., 1988. Beyond Deduction: Ampliative Aspects of Philosophical Reason. London, Routledge.
Williams, Michael, 1988. ‘Skepticism without Theory’. The Review of Metaphysics 41.3:547–588.
Wittgenstein, Ludwig, 1958. Philosophische Untersuchungen/Philosophical Investitations, 2nd ed.; G.E.M. Anscombe, tr. Oxford, Basil Blackwell.
Wolff, Michael, 2009. Abhandlungen über die Prinzipien der Logik, 2nd rev. ed. Frankfurt am Main, Klostermann.
Wundt, Wilhelm, 1907. System der Philosophie, 3 vols., 3d rev. ed. Leipzig, Engelmann.
##submission.downloads##
Objavljeno
2017-09-29
Kako citirati
Westphal, K. R. (2017) „Hegel’s Justification of the Human Right to Non-Domination“, Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society. Belgrade, Serbia, 28(3), стр. 579–612. doi: 10.2298/FID1703579W.
Broj časopisa
Sekcija
STUDIES AND ARTICLES
Licenca
Articles published in Philosophy and Society are open-access in accordance with the CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 License.
