Nature, civility and eschatology: Thomas Hobbes’s progress in three acts

Marko Simendić

doi:10.2298/FID1604884S

Autori

Marko Simendić docent, University of Belgrade, Faculty of Political Sciences

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.2298/FID1604884S

Ključne reči:

Hobbes, progress, determinism, sovereign, world government, antichrist

Apstrakt

This paper argues that Thomas Hobbes’s theory contains an account of progressive defragmentation and unification of power, accompanied by the progression in human reasoning capacities. If the consequence of human nature is abandonment of natural condition and subjection to a sovereign, then similar principles should apply to the sovereigns themselves, since Hobbes sees them as continuing to exist in the state of nature. In turn, the relations between sov- ereigns must also lead to defragmentation of political authority, either by conquest or through peaceful submission. Total defragmentation of power might also have eschatological consequences, as the unified power of one human being over the whole world would remove “external violence” as a cause of “the dissolution of a commonwealth” while the perfection of reason would progressively remove the “internal” causes. This is a hypothetical situation that could relate Hobbes’s description of the Kingdom of God from Leviathan to his wider political theory by marking the single sovereign representative of now immortal all-encompass- ing Leviathan as the Antichrist and thus announcing the second coming of Christ.

Reference

Aron, Raymond (2003), Peace & war: a theory of international relations. New Jersey: Transaction Publishers.
Blits, Jan H. (1989), “Hobbesian Fear”, Political Theory, 17 (3): 417-431.
Beitz, Charles R (1999), Political theory and international relations. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Campodonico, Angelo (1982), “Secularization in Thomas Hobbes’s Anthropolgy”, in J. G. van der Bend (ed.), Thomas Hobbes: His View of Man. Amsterdam: Rodopi. Doyle, Michael (1997), Ways of War and Peace. New York: Norton.
Hampton, Jean (1997), Political Philosophy. Boulder, Colorado: Westview Press.
Hill, Christopher (1971), Antichrist in seventeenth-century England: the Riddell memorial lectures, forty-first series, delivered at the University of Newcastle upon Tyne on 3, 4 and 5 November 1969. London, New York: Oxford University Press. Hobbes, Thomas (1651), Leviathan, or, The matter, form, and power of a common-wealth ecclesiastical and civil by Thomas Hobbes. London.
Hobbes, Thomas (1678), Leviathan, sive De materia, forma, & potestate civitatis ecclesiasticae et civilis. London.
Hobbes, Thomas (1889), The Elements of Law. Ed. Ferdinand Tonnies. London: Simpkin, Marshall.
Hobbes, Thomas (1978a), “De Homine”, in: Man and Citizen. Trans. Charles T. Wood,
T. S. K. Scott-Craig, and Bernard Gert. Gloucester: I! Smith, pp. 33-87.
Hobbes, Thomas (1978b), “De Cive”, in: Man and Citizen. Trans. Thomas Hobbes. Gloucester: P Smith, pp. 87-386.
Hoekstra, Kinch (2007), “Hobbes on the Natural Condition of Mankind”, in: Patricia Springborg (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Hobbes’s Leviathan. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Jesseph, Douglas Michael (2004), “Galileo, Hobbes, and the Book of Nature”, Perspectives on Science 12 (2): 191-211.
Karskens, Machiel (1982), “Hobbes’s Mechanistic Theory of Science, and its Role in his Anthropology”, in: J. G. van der Bend (ed.): Thomas Hobbes: His View of Man. Amsterdam: Rodop, pp. 45-56.
Kraynak, Robert (1983), “Hobbes on Barbarism and Civilization”. In The Journal of Politics 51 (1): 86-109.
Leijenhorst, Cees (2002), The Mechanisation of Aristotelianism, The Late Aristotelian Setting of Thomas Hobbes’ Natural Philosophy. Brill: Leiden.
Lot, Tommy T. (1982), “Hobbes’s Mechanistic Psychology”, in: J. G. van der Bend (ed.), Thomas Hobbes: His View of Man,. Amsterdam: Rodopi., pp. 63-75.
Malcolm, Noel (2003a), “Hobbes, Sandys, and the Virginia Company”, in: Noel Malcom (ed.), Aspects of Hobbes. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 53-79.
Malcolm, Noel. 2003b. “Hobbes’s Theory of International Relations”. In Noel Malcom (ed.), Aspects of Hobbes. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 432-456.
Malcolm, Noel (2007), “The Name And Nature of Leviathan: Political Symbolism and Biblical Exegesis”, Intellectual History Review 17 (1).: 29-58.
Morgenthau, Hans (1971), Politics among nations - The Struggle for Power and Peace. New York: Alfred A Knopf.
Newey, Glen (2008), Routledge Philosophy Guidebook to Hobbes and Leviathan. London: Routledge.
Pocock, John (1989), Politics, language, and time: essays on political thought and history. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Schuman, Frederick (1953), International Politics: The Western State System in Mid-Century. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Simendic, Marko (2012), “Licno i suvereno(st): Hobsovo videnje medunarodnih odnosa”, u: V Milisavljevic, I. Mladenovic (ur.), Tomas Hobs - utemeljenje moderne filozofije politike. Beograd: Institut za filozofiju i drustvenu teoriju, pp. 229-246.
Sorell, Tom (2004), “The Burdensome Freedom of Sovereigns”, in T. Sorell and L.Foisneau (eds.), Leviathan after 350years. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 183-196.
Sorell, Tom (2006), “Hobbes on trade, consumption and international order (Letter to the editor)”, The Monist 89 (2): 245-258.
Spragens, Thomas A (1973), The Politics of Motion: The World of Thomas Hobbes. London: Croom Helm.
Stanton, Timothy (2008), “Hobbes and Locke on Natural Law and Jesus Christ”, History of Political Thought 29 (1): 65-88.