Pawning and challenging in concert: Engagement as a field of study

pages: 311-321

Autori

  • Adriana Zaharijević Institute for Philosophy and Social Theory, University of Belgrade

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.2298/FID1602311Z

Ključne reči:

engagement, field of study, group, 'we', the engaged, the political

Apstrakt

An introduction of sorts, this text opens the thematic collection of articles on engagement. It takes up the idea that a particular group of people engage the idea of engagement in order to establish a field of study. In so doing, the text proposes to tackle the specific creation of the field and of the ‘we’ that engages with its creation. The first portion of the text deals with the multiple meanings of engagement; the second with the idea of the group (of who the ‘we’ is and what it does); while the last segment engages the idea of the political in engagement. Its main aim is to show how the we and the field, at least for a time, cannot be easily disentangled. Keywords: engagement, field of study, group, ‘we’, the engaged, the political

Reference

Arendt, Hannah (1981), The Life of the Mind, ed. Mary McCarthy, New York: Mariner Books.
Ashcroft, Bill, Gareth Griffiths and Helen Tifin (eds) (2003), The Post-Colonial Studies Reader, New York and London: Routledge.
Bacevic, Jana (2016), “Beyond Resistance: Conceptualising Agency through Critical Cultural Political Economy of Education”, in S.L. Robertson, R. Dale, and J. Komljenovic (eds), Cultural Political Economy of Education: Theories, Concepts, Methodologies, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Baert, Patrick (2015), The Existentialist Moment: The Rise of Sartre as a Public Intellectual, Cambridge: Polity.
Berlant, Lauren, Gesa Helms and Marina Vishmidt (2010), “Affect and the Politics of Austerity. An interview exchange with Lauren Berlant”, Variant 39/40, available at http://www.variant.org.uk/39_40texts/berlant39_40.html (last access 24.3.16)
Brown, Wendy (2005), “The Impossibility of Women’s Studies”, in Edgework: Critical Essays on Knowledge and Politics, Princeton University Press.
Butler, Judith and Athena Athanasiou (2013), Dispossession: The Performative in the Political, Cambridge: Polity Press.
Butler, Judith (2015), Notes Toward a Performative Theory of Assembly, Harvard University Press.
Fasenfest, David (2010), “A Political Economy of Knowledge Production”, Critical Sociology, 36 (4): 483-487.
Fassin, Eric (2012), “Sexual Democracy and the New Racialization of Europe”, Journal of Civic Society, 8 (3): 285-288.
Foucault, Michel (1996a), “From Torture to Cellblock”, in Sylvere Lotringer (ed.), Foucault Live. Interviews, 1961-1984, New York: Semiotext(e).
Foucault, Michel (1996b), “The end of the monarchy of sex”, in Sylvere Lotringer (ed.), Foucault Live. Interviews, 1961-1984, New York: Semiotext(e).
Foucault, Michel (1997), Ethics. Subjectivity and Truth (ed. Paul Rabinow, trans.
Robert Hurley and others), New York: The New Press.
Freeman, Jo (1970), The Tyranny of Structurelessness, available at http://www. jofreeman.com/joreen/tyranny.htm (last access 24.3.16)
Sartre, Jean-Paul (1950), What is Literature, trans. Bernard Frechtman, New York: Philosophical Library.
Savic, Mile (2004), “Filozofska politika Z. F. Liotara, ili o refleksivnom pisanju kao obliku dezangazmana”, Filozofija i drustvo, XXIV: 9-49.
Slemon, Stephen (1994), “The scramble for post-colonialism”, in C. Tiffin and A. Lawson (eds), De-scribing Empire: Postcolonialism and Textuality, London: Routledge.
Zinn, Howard (2009), The Zinn Reader: Writings on Disobedience and Democracy, New York: Seven Stories Press.

##submission.downloads##

Objavljeno

2016-05-10

Broj časopisa

Sekcija

ENGAGING REFLEXIVITY, REFLECTING ENGAGEMENT