The Enigma Of Validity: Speculations on the Last Paragraph of Donner Le Temps II

Gabriel Rezende

doi:10.2298/FID2404829R

Autori

Gabriel Rezende Philosophy Department, Federal University of Paraiba

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.2298/FID2404829R

Ključne reči:

gift, normativity, law, validity, deconstruction

Apstrakt

In the final paragraph of the concluding session of the seminar Donner le temps II, Jacques Derrida enunciates—but does not develop—what I shall term the “enigma of validity.” Following a close reading of Heidegger’s On Time and Being, the session abruptly ends with a promise to analyze a certain transition: from the es gibt (“there is,” “il y a”) to the es gilt (“it is valid,” “il vaut,” and “il doit”). This suggest that a set of questions organized thematically around the gift—prominent among these is the idea of a Being that is there and gives itself as a gift—needs a supplement. The enigma of validity pertains to the emergence of a normative vocabulary divided into value, obligation, and interest. In this paper, I will trace some of the clues Derrida leaves in Donner le temps II and other texts, arguing that the “mystery of normativity” is bound to the ambiguous status of legality within metaphysics. Validity, as the mystical foundation of normativity, functions simultaneously as a metaphysical shortcut to secure self-reference in philosophical thought and as the impossibility of any foundational grounding (Grundlegung).

Reference

Agamben, Giorgio. 1999. “The Passion of Facticity.” In: Agamben, Giorgio. Potentialities: collected essays in philosophy. Stanford: Stanford University Press: pp. 185-204.

De Monticelli, Roberta. 2024. The Gift of Bonds: Husserl’s Phenomenology Revisited. Cham: Springer.

Derrida, Jacques. 1973. Speech and Phenomena: And Other Essays on Husserl’s Theory of Signs. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.

. 1976. “Fors: Les Mots Anglés de Nicolas Abraham et Maria Torok.” In: Abraham, Nicolas and Maria Torok. Cryptonymie. Le verbier de l’Homme aux loups. Paris: Flamarion: pp. 7-73.

. 1985. “Préjugés: Devant La Loi.” In: Derrida, Jacques et al. La Faculté de juger, Paris: Editions de Minuit: pp. 87-139.

. 1986. Parages. Paris: Galilée.

. 1987. The Post Card: From Socrates to Freud and Beyond. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

. 1992. Given Time: I. Counterfeit Money. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

. 1993. Sauf Le Nom. Paris: Galilée.

. 1997. Cosmopolites de Tous Les Pays, Encore Un Effort! Paris: Galilée.

. 1998. Of Grammatology. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

. 2002. Who’s Afraid of Philosophy? Right to Philosophy 1. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

. 2003. The Problem of Genesis in Husserl’s Philosophy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

. 2021a. Donner Le Temps II. Paris: Seuil.

. 2021b. Hospitalité, Vol I. Séminaire (1995-1996). Paris: Éditions du Seuil.

Derrida, Jacques, Benoît Peeters, and Marie-Françoise Plissart. 1985. Droit de Regards. Paris: Editions de minuit.

Fink, Eugen. 1966. “Was Will Die Phanomenologie Edmund Husserls?.” In: Fink, Eugen. Studien zur Phänomenologie: 1930 - 1939. Den Haag: Nijhoff: pp. 157–78.

Finlay, Stephen. 2010. “Recent Work on Normativity.” Analysis 70(2): 331–46.

Hart, Herbert Lionel Adolphus. 2012. The Concept of Law. 3rd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Heidegger, Martin. 1982. On the Way to Language. San Francisco: Harper & Row.

. 2002. On Time and Being. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Korsgaard, Christine M. 1996. The Sources of Normativity. Cambridge ; New York: Cambridge University Press.

Liakos, David. 2024. “Propriety, Facticity, Normativity.” Derrida Today 17(2):198–210.

Loick, Daniel. 2014. “Caesarisches Sehen: Heidegger über die Verrechtlichung der Wahrheit.” Zeitschrift Für Philosophische Forschung 68(4):495–526.

Luhmann, Niklas. 1990. “Tautology and Paradox in the Self-Descriptions of Modern Society.” In: Luhmann, Niklas. Essays on self-reference. New York: Columbia University Press: pp. 123-143.

. 2004. Law as a Social System. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Menke, Christoph. 2020. Critique of Rights. Cambridge: Polity.

Møller, Sofie. 2020. Kant’s Tribunal of Reason: Legal Metaphor and Normativity in the Critique of Pure Reason. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Nancy, Jean-Luc. 1977. “Lapsus Judicii.” Communications 26(1): 82–97.

Schnell, Alexander. 2021. Der frühe Derrida und die Phänomenologie: eine Vorlesung. Frankfurt am Main: Vittorio Klostermann.

Sellars, Wilfrid. 1962. “Truth and Correspondence.” Journal of Philosophy 29(2): 29–56.

Spinosa, Charles. 2005. “Derrida and Heidegger: Iterability and Ereignis.” In: Dreyfus, H. L. and M. A. Wrathall, ed. A Companion to Heidegger. Malden: Wiley-Blackwell: pp. 484–510.

Windelband, Wilhelm. [1882] 2021. “Was Ist Philosophie?.” In: Windelband, Wilhelm. Präludien: Aufsätze und Reden zur Philosophie und ihrer Geschichte. Hamburg: Felix Meiner Verlag: pp. 8–53.