Heterogeneity of the Freudian Sign: Kristeva’s Semiotic Chora and Lacan’s Notion of Lalangue

Srđan Đurđević

doi:10.2298/FID2402417D

Autori

Srđan Đurđević Department of Psychology, University Rennes 2

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.2298/FID2402417D

Ključne reči:

semiotic chora, lalangue, Kristeva, Lacan, Hegel, Name of the Father, sinthome, dialectics, letter, topology

Apstrakt

In this contribution, our aim is to explore and analyse the interplay between the approaches of Julia Kristeva and Jacques Lacan during the 1970s. By seeking to transcend the limitations inherent in the structuralist framework, both authors endeavour to introduce new concepts that can account for the heterogeneity of Freudian sign. Previous studies examining the relationship between these two authors predominantly focused on Kristeva’s critique of Lacanian structuralist theory during the 1950s. From this standpoint, the semiotic chora is perceived as a force that fundamentally challenges Lacanian concepts. However, it is important to note that Kristeva was acquainted with Lacan’s later teachings, particularly the notion of lalangue that he introduced. Our argument posits that her critique stems from a misinterpretation of certain key concepts that Lacan put forth in the 1970s. Moreover, while Lacan would abandon the dialectical relationship in favour of the logic of triplicity, Kristeva continued to engage with the notion of heterogeneity through the lens of Hegelian dialectics.

Reference

Balsam, Rosemary. 2014. “The Embodied Mother: Commentary on Kristeva.” Journal of American Psychoanalytical Association 62 (1): 87–100.

Barzilai, Shuli. 1991. “Borders of Language: Kristeva’s Critique of Lacan.” PMLA 106 (2): 294–305.

Cantor, Georg. [1895] 1955. Contributions to the Founding of the Theory of Transfinite Numbers (trans.: P. Jourdain). New York, NY: Dover Publications.

Elliot, Anthony. 2005. “The Constitution of the Subject: Primary Repression after Kristeva and Laplanche.” European Journal of Social Theory 8 (1): 25–42.

Espinoza Lolas, Ricardo. 2023. “The Real and the Human Imbricated… Žižek and Zubiri vs. Miller.” Enrahonar: An International Journal of Theoretical and Practical Thought 70: 83–103.

Freud, Sigmund. [1891] 1953. On Aphasia: A Clinical Study (trans.: E. Stengel). Madison, CT : International

Universities Press.

. [1895] 1953a. “A Project for a Scientific Psychology.” (trans.: J. Strachey, A. Freud, and C. L. Rothgeb). In: The Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud: Vol. 1. London: Hogarth Press and the Institute of Psycho-Analysis, pp.: 283–397.

. [1925] 1953b. “Negation.” (trans.: J. Strachey, A. Freud, and C. L. Rothgeb). In: The Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud: Vol. 19. London: Hogarth Press and the Institute of Psycho-Analysis, pp.: 235–239.

Klein, Melanie. 1930. “The Importance of Symbol-Formation in the Development of the Ego.” The International Journal of Psychoanalysis 11: 24–39.

. 1946. “Notes on Some Schizoid Mechanisms.” International Journal of Psychoanalysis 27: 99–110.

Kristeva, Julia. [1972] 1998. “The Subject in Process.” In: P. French and R-F. Lack, eds. The Tel Quel Reader. London : Routledge, pp.: 133–178.

. [1974] 1980. “The Ethics of Linguistics.” In: L. S. Roudiez, ed. Desire in Language: A Semiotic Approach to Literature and Art. New York, NY: Columbia University Press, pp.: 23–35.

. [1974] 1984. Revolution in Poetic Language (trans.: M. Waller). New York, NY: Columbia University Press.

. [1980] 1982. Powers of Horror: An Essay on Abjection (trans.: L. S. Roudiez). New York, NY: Columbia University Press.

. 1983. “Within the Microcosm of ‘The Talking Cure’.” In: J. H. Smith and W. Kerrigan, eds. Interpreting Lacan. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, pp.: 33–48.

Lacan, Jacques. [1966] 2005a. “Seminar on ‘The Purloined Letter’.” In: Jacques Lacan. Écrits: The First Complete Edition in English (trans.: B. Fink). New York, NY: Norton.

. [1966] 2005b. “The Subversion of the Subject and the Dialectic of Desire.” In: Jacques Lacan. Écrits: The First Complete Edition in English (trans.: B. Fink). New York, NY: Norton.

. [1973] 1998a. The Four Fundamental Concepts of Psychoanalysis: The Seminar of Jacques Lacan, Book XI (trans.: A. Sheridan). New York, NY: Norton.

. [1975] 1998b. On Feminine Sexuality: The Limits of Love and Knowledge: The Seminar of Jacques Lacan, Book XX (trans.: B. Fink). New York, NY: Norton.

. [1975] 2013a. “Columbia University: Lecture on the Symptom.” Culture/Clinic 1: 8–16.

. [1975] 2022. “Yale University: Kanzer Seminar.” The Lacanian Review 12: 39–61.

. [1986] 1997. The Ethics of Psychoanalysis: The Seminar of Jacques Lacan, Book VII (trans.: D. Porter). New York, NY: Norton & Company.

. [1991] 2006b. The Seminar of Jacques Lacan, Book XVII: The Other Side of Psychoanalysis (trans.: R. Grigg). New York, NY: Norton.

. [1998] 2017a. Formations of the Unconscious, Book V (trans.: R. Grigg). Cambridge: Polity Press.

. [2001] 2013b. “Lituraterre.” Hurly-Burly 9: 29–39.

. [2011] 2017b. Talking to Brick Walls (trans.: A. R. Price). Cambridge: Polity Press.

. [2013] 2018. Desire and Its Interpretation, Book VI (trans.: B. Fink). Cambridge: Polity Press.

. 1977. “Ouverture de la Section Clinique. Questions et réponses.” Ornicar? 9: 7–14.

. 1985. “Conférence à Genève sur le symptôme (1975 October 1974).” Le Bloc- notes de la psychanalyse 5: 5–23.

. 2001a. “Joyce le Symptôme.” In: Jacques Lacan. Autres Écrits. Paris : Seuil.

. 2001b. “Préface a l’édition anglaise du Séminaire XI.” In: Jacques Lacan. Autres Écrits. Paris: Seuil.

. 2006a. D’un discours qui ne serait pas du semblant: Le séminaire de Jacques Lacan, livre XVIII. Paris: Seuil.

. 2016. The Sinthome: The Seminar of Jacques Lacan, Book XXIII (trans.: A. R. Price). Cambridge: Polity Press.

. 2021. “La Troisième.” In: J-A. Miller, ed. La Troisième. Théorie de lalangue. Paris: Navarin Éditeur, pp.: 7–49.

. 2023. La Logique du Fantasme: Le Séminaire de Jacques Lacan, Livre XIV. Paris: Seuil.

McAfee, Noelle. 2004. Julia Kristeva. London: Routledge.

Miller, Jacques-Alain. 2012. “Le réel au XXIe siècle. Présentation du thème du IXe Congrès de l’AMP.” La Cause du Désir 82: 87–94.

. 2021a. “Commentaire sur la Troisième.” In: J-A. Miller, ed. La Troisième. Théorie de lalangue. Paris : Navarin Éditeur, pp.: 51–61.

. 2021b. “Théorie de lalangue.” In: J-A. Miller, ed. La Troisième. Théorie de lalangue. Paris: Navarin Éditeur, pp.: 63–92.

Plato. 2008. Timaeus and Critias (trans.: R. Waterfield). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Rae, Gavin. 2019. “Maternal and Paternal Functions in the Formation of Subjectivity: Kristeva and Lacan.” Philosophy and Social Criticism 46 (4): 412–430.

Segal, Hanna. 1952. “Notes on Symbol Formation.” International Journal of Psychoanalysis 38: 391–397.

Sjöholm, Cecilia. 2005. Kristeva and the Political. London : Routledge.

Soler, Colette. [2009] 2014. Lacan: The Unconscious Reinvented (trans.: E. Faye and S. Schwartz). London: Karnac.

Vanheule, Stijn. [2011] 2016. The Subject of Psychosis: A Lacanian Perspective. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

Žižek, Slavoj. 2016. “Is Surplus-Value Marx’s Name for Surplus-Enjoyment.” Masterclass. URL: https://backdoorbroadcasting.net/2016/04/slavoj- zizekmasterclass-2-surplus-value-surplus-enjoyment-surplus-knowledge/ (last accessed: May 27, 2024).