Being Human is a Kaleidoscopic Affair

Maria Kronfeldner

doi:10.2298/FID2401005K

Autori

Maria Kronfeldner Central European University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.2298/FID2401005K%20

Ključne reči:

being human, human nature, pluralism, going beyond the life sciences

Apstrakt

This paper spells out the ways in which we need to be pluralists about “human nature”. It discusses a conceptual pluralism about the concept of “human nature”, stemming from post-essentialist ontology and the semantic complexity of the term “nature”; a descriptive pluralism about the “descriptive nature” of human beings, which is a pluralism regarding our self-understanding as human beings that stems from the long list of typical features of, and relations between, human beings; a natural kind term pluralism, which is a pluralism that concerns the choices we have in deciding how to apply the kind term “human”; and an explanatory pluralism that results from the causal complexity of life. Because of the complexity of being human, which gives rise to these pluralisms, being human is, the paper claims, a kaleidoscopic affair, and one far from concerning the life sciences only.

Reference

Buskell, Andrew. 2019. “Review of What’s Left of Human Nature? A Post-Essentialist, Pluralist, and Interactive Account of a Contested Concept.” International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 32: 137–140.

Dick, Philip K. 1968. Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep? New York, NY: Del Rey.

Friedman, John B. 1981. The Monstrous Races in Medieval Art and Thought. Syracuse,

NY: Syracuse University Press.

Gallie, Walter B. 1956. “Essentially Contested Concepts.” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 56: 167–198.

Griffiths, Paul E., and Russell D. Gray. 1994. “Developmental Systems and Evolutionary Explanation.” The Journal of Philosophy 91: 277–304.

Haraway, Donna J. 2003. The Companion Species Manifesto: Dogs, People, and Significant Otherness. Cambridge: Prickly Paradigm Press.

Ingold, Tim. 2000. Perception of the Environment: Essays on Livelihood, Dwelling and Skill. London: Routledge.

Keller, Evelyn Fox. 2010. The Mirage of a Space Between Nature and Nurture. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

Kroeber, Alfred L. 1917. “The Superorganic.” American Anthropologist 19 (2): 163–213.

Kronfeldner, Maria. 2010. “Won’t You Please Unite? Darwinism, Cultural Evolution and Kinds of Synthesis.” In: Barahona, Ana, Edna Suarez-Díaz, and Hans-Jörg Rheinberger, eds. The Hereditary Hourglass. Genetics and Epigenetics, 1868–2000.: Vol. Preprint 392, Max Planck Institute for the History of Science, pp.: 111–125.

–. 2015. “Reconstituting Phenomena.” In: Mäki, Uskali, Stéphanie Ruphy, Ioannis Votsis, and Gerhard Schurz, eds. Recent Developments in the Philosophy of Science. Cham: Springer, pp.: 169–182.

–. 2017. “The Right to Ignore: An Epistemic Defense of the Nature/Culture Divide.” In: Joyce, Richard, ed. The Routledge Handbook of Evolution and Philosophy. New York, NY: Routledge, pp.: 210–224.

–. 2018a. What’s Left of Human Nature? A Post-Essentialist, Pluralist, and Interactive Account of a Contested Concept. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

–. 2018b. Synopsis of What’s Left of Human Nature? Unpublished archive version. URL: https://philpapers.org/arhcive/KROWLO.pdf (last accessed: March 21, 2024).

–. 2018c. “Divide and Conquer: The Authority of Nature and Why We Disagree about Human Nature.” In: Elizabeth Hannon, and Tim Lewens, eds. Why We Disagree about Human Nature. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp.: 186–206.

–. 2021a. “Digging the Channels of Inheritance: On How to Distinguish between Cultural and Biological Inheritance.” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 376: 20200042.

–. 2021b. “Psychological Essentialism and Dehumanization.” In: Maria Kronfeldner, ed. The Routledge Handbook of Dehumanization. New York, NY: Routledge, pp.: 362–377.

Lewontin, Richard C. 1974. “The Analysis of Variance and the Analysis of Causes.” American Journal of Human Genetics 26: 400–411.

Lewontin, Richard C., and Richard Levins. 1985. The Dialectical Biologist. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Longino, Helen E. 2013. Studying Human Behavior: How Scientists Investigate Aggression and Sexuality. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.

McNutt, Ellison J., Bernhard Zipfel, and Jeremy M. DeSilva. 2018. “The Evolution of the Human Foot.” Evolutionary Anthropology: Issues, News, and Reviews 27: 197–217.

Mitchell, Sandra D. 2003. Biological Complexity and Integrative Pluralism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

–. 2009. Unsimple Truths: Science, Complexity, and Policy. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.

Münster, Sebastian. 1548. Cosmographia: Beschreibung aller Länder durch Sebastianum Munsterum. Basel: Petri.

Oyama, Susan. 1985. The Ontogeny of Information: Developmental Systems and Evolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Pope, Alexander. 1871. Essay on Man (M. Pattison, ed. 1932). Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Sahlins, Marshall. 2008. The Western Illusion of Human Nature. Cambridge: Prickly Paradigm Press.

Stuurman, Siep. 2017. The Invention of Humanity: Equality and Cultural Difference in World History. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Viveiros de Castro, Eduardo. 1992. From the Enemy’s Point of View: Humanity and Divinity in an Amazonian Society. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.

Webber, James T., and David A. Raichlen. 2016. “The Role of Plantigrady and Heel- strike in the Mechanics and Energetics of Human Walking with Implications for the Evolution of the Human Foot.” Journal of Experimental Biology 219: 3729–3737.