Modal Logic in Integrative Philosophical Practice

Aleksandar Fatić

doi:10.2298/FID2303424F

Autori

Aleksandar Fatić University of Belgrade, Institute for Philosophy and Social Theory

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.2298/FID2303424F

Ključne reči:

Psychoanalysis, philosophical practice, Jung, Lacan, “spirit of the depth”, dream psychology, trust

Apstrakt

The paper discusses the differences between a practical emphasis on binary logic on the one hand, and modal logic, on the other, specifically in the fields of philosophical practice and psychotherapy. Although studies of practical applications of modal logic in the helping professions are recent, the discussion largely revolves around the controversial application of modality in psychotherapy by C.G. Jung and Lacan’s psychoanalysis. The present argument touches on some of the conceptual dilemmas associated with the relationship between logical modality, intuition and scientificity in psychotherapy, all of which are a part of the philosophical foundation of psychotherapy.

Reference

Aidukiewitz, Kazimierz (1973), Problems and Theories of Philosophy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Braunstein, Nestor (2006), “Desire and Jouissance in the Teachings of Lacan”, in Jean-Michael Rabate (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Lacan, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 102–115.

Freud, Sigmund (2010), The Interpretation of Dreams: The Complete and Definitive Text, edited by James Strachey, New York: Basic Books.

Galtung, Johan (1996), Peace by Peaceful Means, Oslo and London: International Institute for Peace Studies (PRIO) and Sage Publications.

—. (2009), Theories of Conflict, Oslo: Transcend.

Jung, Carl (1953), The Collected Works of C.G. Jung, edited by Michael Fordham, London: Routledge.

—. (1956), Symbols and Transformations, in Carl Jung, Collective Works of C.G. Jung, Princeton: Princeton University Press.

—. (1960), Synchronicity: An Acausal Connecting Principle, Princeton: Princeton University Press.

—. (2009), The Red Book, edited by S. Shamdasani, New York: Norton and Company.

Kuhn, Thomas (1962), The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Lacan, Jacques (1970). “Of Structure as an Inmixing of Otherness Prerequisite to Any Subject Whatever”, Richard Macksey and Eugenio Donato (eds.), The Language of Criticism and the Sciences of Man: The Structuralist Controversy, Baltimore and London: The Johns Hopkins Press, pp. XX-XX.

Marinoff, Lou (2002), Philosophical Practice, Cambridge, Massachusetts: Academic Press.

Myers, Gerald E. (1969), “William James’s Theory of Emotion”, Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 5 (2): 67–89 (https://www.jstor.org/stable/40319566).

Seligman, Adam (1997), The Problem of Trust, Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Shusterman, Richard (2008), Body Conscious: A Philosophy of Mindfulness and Somaesthetics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

—. (2012), Thinking through the body. Essays in Somaesthetics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Van Benthem, Johan (2010), Modal Logic for Open Minds, Stanford: CSLI Publications.

Verhaeghe, Paul (2008), On Being Normal and Other Disorders, London: Karnac.

Williamson, Timothy (2013), “Possible Worlds Modal Theory”, in Timothy Williamson, Modal Logic as Metaphysics, online edition. Oxford Academic, pp. 81–147. Doi: http://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199552078.003.0003