Cicero and Hobbes on the Person of the State

Autori

  • Marko Simendić University of Belgrade, Faculty of Political Science

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.2298/FID2201247S%20

Ključne reči:

Hobbes, Cicero, person, representation, persona civitatis, persona, state

Apstrakt

The importance of Thomas Hobbes’s account of personation and representation can hardly be overstated. And his intellectual debt to one of his classical foes, Marcus Tullius Cicero, can hardly be ignored. This paper compares Hobbes’s ideas on personhood of the state with Cicero’s notion of persona civitatis, and attempts to describe how Hobbes reshaped Cicero’s guidelines for (re)presenting legitimate authority into a prop for defending any effective authority. Hobbes absorbs Cicero’s influential argument and builds on the idea of civic representation as guardianship done by role-playing, while tearing down Cicero’s account’s ethical foundations. In contrast to Cicero’s magistrate, the social role of Hobbes’s sovereign is not scripted by ethical constrains: its purpose is not to restrict license, but to present it.

Reference

Asmis, Elizabeth (2004), “The State as a Partnership: Cicero’s Definition of res publica in his work On the State”, History of Political Thought 25 (4): 569–599.

—. (2005), “A New Kind of Model: Cicero’s Roman Constitution in De republica”, American Journal of Philology 126 (3): 377–416.

Cicero, Marcus Tullius (1783), “De Inventione Rhetorica”, in M. Tullii Ciceronis Opera, Tomus Primus, Oxonia: Typographeum Clarendonianum, pp. 1–127.

—. (1826), De Re Publica, G. H. Moser, F. Creuzer (eds.), Francofurti ad Maenum.

—. (1853), “The Treatise on Rhetorical Invention”, in The Orations of Marcus Tullius Cicero, Vol. 4, C. D. Yonge (transl.), London, pp. 241–380.

—. (1855), M. Tullii Ciceronis Orationes with a Commentary by George Long, Vol. 2, George Long (ed.), A. J. Macleane (rev.), London.

—. (1856), The Orations of Marcus Tullius Cicero, Vol. 2, C. D. Yonge (transl.), London.

—. (1913), De Officiis With an English translation by Walter Miller, London: William Heinemann ltd.

—. (1999a), “On the Commonwealth”, in James E. G. Zetzel (ed.), On the Common- wealth and On the Laws, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 1–103.

—. (1999b), “On the Laws”, in James E. G. Zetzel (ed.), On the Commonwealth and On the Laws, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 105–175.

De Lacy, Phillip (1977), “The Four Stoic Personae”, Illinois Classical Studies 2: 163–172.

Engberg-Pedersen, Troels (2001), “Stoic Philosophy and the Concept of Person”, in Christopher Gill (ed.), The Person and the Human Mind: Issues in Ancient and Modern Philosophy, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 109–136.

Gill, Christopher (1988), “Personhood and Personality: The Four-Personae Theory in Cicero, De Officiis”, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy, Vol. 6, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 169–199.

Hampton, Jean (1997), Political Philosophy, Boulder, Colorado: Westview Press. Hobbes, Thomas (1651), Leviathan, or, The matter, form, and power of a commonwealth ecclesiastical and civil by Thomas Hobbes, London.

—. (1668), Leviathan, sive De materia, forma, & potestate civitatis ecclesiasticae et civilis, London.

—. (1682), “An answer to Arch-bishop Bramhall’s book called the catching of the Leviathan”, in Tracts of Mr. Thomas Hobbs of Malmsbury, London.

—. (1978a), “On Man”, in Man and Citizen, Indianapolis; Cambridge: Hackett Publishing Company, pp. 33–87.

—. (1978b), “The Citizen”, in Man and Citizen, Indianapolis; Cambridge: Hackett Publishing Company, pp. 87–386.

Kantorowicz, Ernst (1997), The King’s Two Bodies, Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Plato (1997), “Republic”, in John M. Cooper (ed.), Plato: Complete Works, Indianapolis; Cambridge: Hackett Publishing Company, pp. 971–1223.

Roby, Henry John (2000), Roman Private Law in the Times of Cicero and of the Antonines, Vol. 1. Union, New Jersey: The Lawbook Exchange.

Skinner, Quentin (1999), “Hobbes and the Purely Artificial Person of the State”, The Journal of Political Philosophy 7 (1): 1–29.

—. (2004), “Hobbes and the Purely Artificial Person of the State”, in Visions of Politics Vol. 3: Hobbes and Civil Science, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 177–208.

—. (2005), “Hobbes on Representation”, European Journal of Philosophy 13 (2): 155–184.

—. (2018), From Humanism to Hobbes. Studies in Rhetoric and Politics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Stanton, Timothy (2010), “Hobbes’s Redefinition of the Commonwealth”, in Tom Stoneham, Keith Allen (eds.), Causation and Modern Philosophy, London: Routledge, pp. 104–122.

Walbank, Frank W. (2002), Polybius, Rome And The Hellenistic World. Essays and Reflections, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Watson, Alan (ed.) (1998), The Digest of Justinian, Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.

Wood, Neil (1988), Cicero’s Social and Political Thought, Berkeley: University of California Press.

##submission.downloads##

Objavljeno

2022-03-31