Failed Expectations: Can Deliberative Innovations Produce Democratic Effects in Hybrid Regimes?

Irena Fiket; Vujo  Ilić; Gazela  Pudar Draško

doi:10.2298/FID2201050F

Autori

Irena Fiket University of Belgrade, Institute for Philosophy and Social Theory
Vujo Ilić University of Belgrade, Institute for Philosophy and Social Theory
Gazela Pudar Draško University of Belgrade, Institute for Philosophy and Social Theory

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.2298/FID2201050F

Ključne reči:

deliberative democracy, mini public, democratic innovation, citizen participation, hybrid regime, Serbia

Apstrakt

Participation in deliberation in stable democracies produces effects which are beneficial for democracy, while the results of deliberative innovations in non-democracies are more ambiguous. This article contributes to the debate about the effects of participatory democratic innovations on attitudes, related to democratic commitments, political capacities and political participation, in the increasingly ubiquitous hybrid regimes. We present the evidence collected from the participants before and after deliberative mini publics (DMPs), held in Serbia in 2020. Serbia is an exemplary case of a recent wave of autocratization, which had led to it becoming a hybrid regime, and it had no track record of deliberative innovations. When conducting the mini publics, we introduced an innovation in the standard design, by including active citizens – representatives of local initiatives or social movements particularly interested in the issue of DMPs. We could not find evidence that the democratic innovation affected attitudes of participants regarding democratic commitments, political capacities and political participation. However, we did find that participants of the DMPs became less satisfied with the functioning of the democracy on the local level. We argue that the anti-democratic wider context of hybrid regimes can produce adverse effects when introducing participatory democratic innovations, at least when it comes to this specific dimension of political participation. We conclude with the suggestions for further research, and a call for consideration of the wider political context when designing democratic interventions in hybrid regimes.

Reference

Alizada, Nazifa; Cole, Rowan; Gastaldi, Lisa; Grahn, Sandra; Hellmeier, Sebastian; Kolvani, Palina; Lachapelle, Jean; Lührmann, Anna; Maerz, Seraphine F.; Pillai, Shreeya; Lindberg, Staffan I. (2021), Autocratization Turns Viral: Democracy Report 2021, University of Gothenburg: V-Dem Institute.

Bandura, Albert (1997), Self-efficacy: The Exercise of Control, New York: Freeman.

Barber, Benjamin (1984), Strong Democracy: Participatory Politics for a New Age, Berkeley: University of California Press.

Bellucci, Paolo; Memoli, Vincenzo (2012), “The Determinants of Democratic Support in Europe”, in David Sanders, Pedro Magalhaes, Gabor Toka (eds.), Citizens and the European Polity: Mass Attitudes Towards the European and National Polities, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 9–38.

Benhabib, Seyla (1996), “The Democratic Moment and the Problem of Difference”, in Seyla Benhabib (ed.), Democracy and Difference: Contesting the Boundaries of the Political, Princeton: Princeton University Press, pp. 3–18.

Bermeo, Nancy (2016), “On Democratic Backsliding”, Journal of Democracy 27 (1): 5–19.

Bieber, Florian (2018), “Patterns of Competitive Authoritarianism in the Western Balkans”, East European Politics 34 (3): 337–354.

Braithwaite, Valerie; Levi, Margaret (eds.) (1998), Trust and Governance, New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

Caprara, Gian Vittorio; Vecchione, Michele (2017), Personalizing Politics and Realizing Democracy, New York: Oxford University Press.

Chambers, Simone (2003), “Deliberative Democratic Theory”, Annual Review of Political Science 6 (1): 307–326.

Chao Chen; Li, Andrew X.; Zhang, Suixin (2021), “The Gift of Authoritarian Experience: The Determinants of Online Political Efficacy in New Democracies”, Telematics and Informatics 63 (2021): 101674.

Craig, Stephen; Maggiotto, Michael A. (1981), “Political Discontent and Political Action”, Journal of Politics 43 (2): 514–522.

Craig, Stephen; Niemi, Richard; Silver, Glenn (1990), “Political Efficacy and Trust: A Report on the NES Pilot Study Items”, Political Behavior 12 (3): 289–314.

Crta (2013), Učešće građana u demokratskim procesima Srbije, Beograd: Crta.

—. (2014), Učešće građana u demokratskim procesima u Srbiji 2014, Beograd: Crta.

—. (2015), Javno mnjenje o učešću građana u demokratskim procesima u Srbiji 2015. godine, Beograd: Crta.

—. (2016), Javno mnjenje o učešću građana u demokratskim procesima Srbije 2016. godine, Beograd: Crta.

—. (2017), Učešće građana u demokratskim procesima u Srbiji 2017, Beograd: Crta.

—. (2018), Učešće građana u demokratskim procesima u Srbiji 2018, Beograd: Crta.

—. (2019), Javno mnjenje o učešću građana u demokratskim procesima Srbije 2019, Beograd: Crta.

Denters, Bas; Gabriel, Oscar; Torcal, Mariano (2007), “Political Confidence in Representative Democracies”, in Jan W. Van Deth, José Ramón Montero, Anders Westholm (eds.), Citizenship and Involvement in European Democracies: A Comparative Analysis, London: Routledge, pp. 66–87.

Diamond, Larry (2015), “Facing up to the Democratic Recession”, Journal of Democracy 26 (1): 141–155.

Đorđević, Ana; Vasiljević, Jelena (2022), “The Effects of Deliberation on Citizens’ Knowledge, Attitudes and Preferences: The Case Study of a Deliberative Mini-public on Traffic Mobility in Belgrade City Centre”, Philosophy and Society 33 (1): 72–97.

Dryzek, John S. (2000), Deliberative Democracy and Beyond, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

European Commision (2019), Standard Eurobarometer 92 (2019) – Wave EB92.3.

European Commision (2021), Standard Eurobarometer 94 (2021) – Wave EB94.3.

European Social Survey Round 9 Data (2018), Data file edition 3.1, NSD - Norwegian Centre for Research Data, Norway – Data Archive and distributor of ESS data for ESS ERIC.

Farrar, Cynthia; Fishkin, James S.; Green, Donald P.; List, Christina; Luskin, Robert C.; Paluck, Elisabeth L. (2009), “Disaggregating Deliberation’s Effects: An Experiment Within a Deliberative Poll”, British Journal of Political Science 40 (2): 333–347.

Fiket, Irena (2019), Deliberativno građanstvo, Beograd: Akademska knjiga.

Fiket, Irena; Đorđević, Biljana (2022), “Promises and Challenges of Deliberative and Participatory innovations in Hybrid Regimes”, Philosophy and Society 33 (1): 3–25.

Fiket, Irena; Memoli, Vincenzo (2013), “Improving the quality of democracy: The case of Deliberative Poll held in 2007 in Turin”, in Brigitte Geißel, Marko Joas (eds.), Participatory Democratic Innovations in Europe: Improving the Quality of Democracy?, Berlin; Toronto: Barbara Budrich Publishers, pp. 123–142.

Fiket, Irena; Pavlović, Zoran; Pudar Draško, Gazela (2017), Političke orijentacije građana Srbije: Kartografija nemoći, Beograd: Friedrich Ebert Stiftung.

Fiket, Irena; Pudar Draško, Gazela (2021), „Mogućnost vaninstitucionalne političke participacije unutar neresponsivnog sistema Srbije: uticaj (ne)poverenja i interne političke efikasnosti“, Sociologija 63 (2): 400–418.

Fishkin, James S. (2009), When the People Speak, Deliberative Democracy and Public Consultation, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Gamson, William A. (1968), Power and Discontent, Homewood: Dorsey Press.

Goodin, Robert E.; Dryzek, John S. (2006), “Deliberative Impacts: The Macro-Political Uptake of MiniPublics”, Politics & Society 34 (2): 219–244.

Gravetter, Frederick J.; Wallnau, Larry B.; Forzano, Lori-Ann B.; Witnauer, James E. (2021), Essentials of statistics for the behavioral sciences, Boston: Cengage Learning.

Grönlund, Kimmo; Setälä, Maija; Herne, Kaisa (2010), “Deliberation and Civic Virtue: Lessons from a Citizen Deliberation Experiment”, European Political Science Review 2 (1): 95–117.

Gutmann, Amy; Thompson, Dennis F. (1996), Democracy and Disagreement, Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

Habermas, Jürgen (1984), The Theory of Communicative Action, Volume 1: Reason and the Rationalization of Society, Thomas McCarthy (transl.), Boston: Beacon Press.

He, Baogang (2014), “Deliberative Culture and Politics: The Persistence of Authoritarian Deliberation in China”, Political Theory 42 (1): 58–81.

He, Baogang; Warren, Mark E. (2011), “Authoritarian Deliberation: The Deliberative Turn in Chinese Political Development”, Perspectives on Politics 9 (2): 269–289.

—. (2017), “Authoritarian Deliberation in China”, Daedalus 146 (3): 155–166.

Inglehart, Ronald (1997), Modernization and Postmodernization, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Janković, Ivana (2022), “Deliberative Democracy – Theory and Practice: The Case of the Belgrade Citizens’ Assembly”, Philosophy and Society 33 (1): 26–49.

Jayasuriya, Kanishka; Rodan, Garry (2007), “Beyond Hybrid Regimes: More Participation, Less Contestation in Southeast Asia”, Democratization 14 (5): 773–794.

Karv, Thomas; Lindell, Marina; Rapeli, Lauri (2021), “How Context Matters: The Significance of Political Homogeneity and Language for Political Efficacy”, Scandinavian Political Studies 45 (1): 46–67.

Lavrič, Miran; Bieber, Florian (2021), “Shifts in Support for Authoritarianism and Democracy in the Western Balkans”, Problems of Post-Communism 68 (1): 17–26.

Leib, Ethan; He, Baogang (2006), The Search for Deliberative Democracy in China, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan

Levitsky, Steven; Ziblatt, Daniel (2018), How Democracies Die, New York: Crown Publishing.

Levitsky, Steven; Way, Lucan A. (2002), “Elections without Democracy: The Rise of Competitive Authoritarianism”, Journal of Democracy 13 (2): 51–65.

—. (2010), Competitive Authoritarianism: Hybrid Regimes after the Cold War, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

—. (2020), “The New Competitive Authoritarianism”, Journal of Democracy 31 (1): 51–65.

Lührmann, Anna; Lindberg, Staffan I. (2019), “A Third Wave of Autocratization is Here: What is New about It?”, Democratization 26 (7): 1095–1113.

Lührmann, Anna; Tannenberg, Marcus; Lindberg, Staffan I. (2018), “Regimes of the World (RoW): Opening New Avenues for the Comparative Study of Political Regimes”, Politics and Governance 6 (1): 60–77.

Luskin, Robert C.; Fishkin, James S.; Jowell, Roger (2002), “Considered Opinions: Deliberative Polling in Britain”, British Journal of Political Science 32 (3): 455–487.

Mansbridge, Jane (2010), “Deliberative Polling as the Gold Standard”, The Good Society 19 (1): 55–62.

—. (2020), “The Evolution of Political Representation in Liberal Democracies: Concepts and Practices”, in The Oxford Handbook of Political Representation in Liberal Democracies, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 17–54.

Mayne, Quinton; Geissel, Brigitte (2016), “Putting the Demos Back into the Concept of Democratic Quality”, International Political Science Review 37 (5): 634–644.

—. (2018), “Don’t Good Democracies Need “Good” Citizens? Citizen Dispositions and the Study of Democratic Quality”, Politics and Governance 6 (1): 33–47.

McQuarrie, Michael (2015), “No Contest: Participatory Technologies and the Transformation of Urban Authority”, in Democratizing Inequalities, Dilemmas of the New Public Participation, New York: New York University Press, pp. 83–101.

Merkel, Wolfgang (2014), “Is there a Crisis of Democracy?”, Democratic Theory 1 (2): 11–25.

Milosavljević, Miloš; Spasenić, Željko; Benković, Slađana; Dmitrović, Veljko (2020), “Participatory Budgeting in Serbia: Lessons Learnt from Pilot Projects”, Lex Localis 18 (4): 999–1021.

Morrell, Michael E. (2005), “Deliberation, Democratic Decision-Making and Internal Political Efficacy”, Political Behavior 27 (1): 49–69.

Niemi, Richard; Craig, Stephen; Mattei, Franco (1991), “Measuring Internal Political Efficiency in the 1988 National Election Study”, American Political Science Review 85 (4): 1407–1413.

Norris, Pippa (ed.) (1999), Critical Citizens, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Pateman, Carole (1970), Participation and Democratic Theory, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Petrović, Jelisaveta; Stanojević, Dragan (2020), “Political Activism in Serbia”, Comparative Southeast European Studies 68 (3): 365–385.

Putnam, Robert D. (1993), Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

—. (2000), Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community, New York: Simon & Schuster.

Rahman, K. Sabeel; Russon Gilman, Hollie (2019), “Democracy in Crisis”, in Civic Power: Rebuilding American Democracy in an Era of Crisis, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 1–44.

Repucci, Sarah (2020), Freedom in the World 2020: a Leaderless Struggle for Democracy, Washington: Freedom House.

Rosenberg, Shawn (2005), “The Empirical Study of Deliberative Democracy: Setting a Research Agenda”, Acta Politica 40 (2): 212–224.

Scharpf, Fritz W. (1999), Governing in Europe: Effective and Democratic?, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Schedler, Andreas (ed.) (2006), Electoral Authoritarianism: The Dynamics of Unfree Competition, Boulder: Lynne Rienner Publishers.

Smith, Graham; Ryan, Matthew (2012), “Defining Mini-Public: Making Sense of Existing Conceptions”, paper presented at the Political Science Association Annual Conference, Belfast, April 3-5, 2012.

Spada, Paolo (2019), “The Impact of Democratic Innovations on Citizens’ Efficacy”, in Stephen Elstub, Oliver Escobar (eds.), Handbook of Democratic Innovation and Governance, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, pp. 161–176.

Stojilović, Darko; Ilić, Vujo (2022), Stavovi građana Srbije o učešću u demokratskim procesima 2021, Beograd: Crta.

Stoker, Gerry; Evans, Mark (2019), “Does Political Trust Matter?”, in Stephen Elstub, Oliver Escobar (eds.), Handbook of Democratic Innovation and Governance, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, pp. 120–134.

Sztompka, Piotr (2000), Trust: A Sociological Theory, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Vladisavljević, Nebojša (2019), Uspon i pad demokratije posle Petog oktobra, Beograd: Arhipelag.

Warren, Mark E. (1992), “Democratic Theory and Self-Transformation”, American Political Science Review 86 (1): 8–23.

—. (1999), “Democratic Theory and Trust”, in Mark E. Warren (ed.), Democracy and Trust, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 310–345.

—. (2009), “Two Trust-Based Uses of Minipublics in Democracy”, paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Toronto, September 3-6, 2009.

Wolak, Jennifer (2018), “Feelings of Political Efficacy in the Fifty States”, Political Behavior 40 (3): 763–784.

Yan, Wenjie (2018), “Where is the Deliberative Turn Going? A Survey Study of the Impacts of Public Consultation and Deliberation in China”, International Journal of Communication 12 (2018): 2661–2682.

Yeich, Susan; Levine, Ralph (1994), “Political Efficacy: Enhancing the Construct and its Relationship to Mobilization of People?”, Journal of Community Psychology 22 (3): 259–271.

Zakaria, Fareed (2003), The Future of Freedom: Illiberal Democracy at Home and Abroad, New York: W. W. Norton & Company.

Zhou, Wei (2012), “In Search of Deliberative Democracy in China”, Journal of Public Deliberation 8 (1), Art. 8.

Zmerli, Sonja; Newton, Kenneth (2007), “Trust in People, Confidence in Political Institutions, and Satisfaction with Democracy”, in Jan W. Van Deth, José Ramón Montero, Anders Westholm (eds.), Citizenship and Involvement among the Populations of European Democracies: A Comparative Analysis, London: Routledge, pp. 35–65.