Aliénation, Entfremdung – and Alienation. Hegel’s Solidary Displacement of Diderot
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.2298/FID2104589SKljučne reči:
alienation, Hegel, Goethe, Diderot, spirit, Modernity, critique, pathologyApstrakt
Hegel’s Phenomenology of Spirit put alienation high on the philosophical agenda, as was readily recognized by Marx. Relatively well-known is also that Hegel’s concept of alienation was inspired by Goethe’s translation of Diderot’s dialogue Rameau’s Nephew, but the details and the conceptual implications of these details typically escape scholarly attention. Recognizing the basic idea of alienation as not-belonging to or being deprived of something, I emphasize that alienation implies a movement towards the limits of the human being, in which the mental suffering this involves is conditioned by social pathologies. To substantiate this claim, I show how Diderot’s satire implies uncompromising materialist social criticism, but that it does not employ the term ‘aliénation’ but instead reserves it for a kind of frenzy that borders on insanity. My claim is then that, in Goethe’s translation of Diderot’s dialogue, and in his translation of ‘aliénation’ to ‘Entfremdung’, Hegel found a general key for the conceptual critique of the spirit of Modernity. I therefore argue that, in the Phenomenology, Hegel employed alienation in more than one sense, raising madness to the level of a characteristic of Modernity, stressing the detrimental implications for consciousness under such living conditions, emphasizing how alienation works as negation, and, finally, pointing nevertheless to the possibility of embracing social and political reality.
Reference
Barzun, Jacques (2001), “Preface” (1956), in Ralph H. Bowen (ed.), Diderot: Rameau’s Nephew and other Works, Indianapolis: Hackett, pp. 3–7.
Besag, Frank P. (1966), Alienation and Education: An empirical approach, Buffalo, N.Y: Hertillon Press.
Bewes, Timothy (1997), Cynicism and Postmodernity, London; New York: Verso.
Boey, Conrad (1972), “L’aliénation hégélienne: Un chaînon de l’expérience de la conscience et de la Phénoménologie de l’esprit”, Archives de Philosophie 35 (1): 87–110. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/43033415
Boey, Koen (2006), „Entfremdung“, in Paul Cobben (ed.), Hegel-Lexikon, Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft, pp. 195–196.
Bonnet, Jean-Claude (1983), “Introduction”, in Denis Diderot, Le Neveu de Rameau, Paris: GF Flammarion, pp. 5–42.
Brauer, Daniel (2008), „Hegels Aufklärung der Aufklärung“, in Klaus Vieweg, Wolfgang Welsch (eds.), Hegels Phänomenologie des Geistes: Ein Kooperativer Kommentar zu einem Schlüsselwerk der Moderne, Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, pp. 474–488.
Diderot, Denis (1963), Le neveu de Rameau, J. Fabre (ed.), Genève: Droz.
—. (1983), Le neveu de Rameau, J.-C. Bonnet (ed.), Paris: GF Flammarion.
—. (1987), Rameaus nevø, O. Pedersen, Trans. O. Pedersen (ed.), Kbh.: Basilisk.
—. (2001), “Rameau’s Nephew”, J. Barzun, (trans.), in R. H. Bowen (ed.), Rameau’s Nephew and Other Works (1956), Indianapolis: Hackett, pp. 8–87.
Falvey, John F. (1985), Diderot: Le neveu de Rameau, London: Grant & Cutler.
Feuerlicht, Ignace (1978), Alienation: from the Past to the Future, Westport: Greenwood Press.
Foucault, Michel (1978), Histoire de la folie a L’age Classique [1972] (2 ed.), Paris: Gallimard.
Goethe, Johann Wolfgang v. (1996), Rameaus Neffe. Ein Dialog von Denis Diderot. Übersetzt von Goethe. Zweisprachige Ausgabe (J. W. Goethe, trans. H. Günther ed. pb. ed.), Frankfurt am Main: Insel.
—. (1820), Rameau’s Neffe; ein dialog von Diderot (Vol. XV), Stockholm und Upsala: Bruselius.
Granier, Jean (1980), ”Hegel et la révolution française”, Revue de Metaphysique et de Morale 85 (1): 1–26. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/40902006
Hansen-Löve, Aage A. (2018), Schwangere Musen – Rebellische Helden antigenerisches
Schreiben. Von Sterne zu Dostoevskij, von Flaubert zu Nabokov, Paderborn:
Wilhelm Fink.
Hegel, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich (1970), Phänomenologie des Geistes (1807), Frankfurt
am Main: Suhrkamp.
—. (1980), Phänomenologie des Geistes (1807) in Wolfgang Bonsiepen, Reinhard
Heede (eds.), Gesammelte Werke (vol. 9), Hamburg: Felix Meiner.
—. (1986), Vorlesungen über die Geschichte der Philosophie, I, Frankfurt am Main:
Suhrkamp.
Heidegren, Carl-Göran (1995), Hegels Fenomenologi. En analys och kommentar,
Stockholm and Stehag: Brutus Östling.
Henning, Christoph (2015), Theorien der Entfremdung zur Einführung, Hamburg:
Junius.
Hercule mourant. (21-07.2019), Opéra baroque.
Hornby, Albert Sidney (1985), Oxford advanced learner’s dictionary of current English
(1974) (3 ed.), London: Oxford University Press.
Hyppolite, Jean (1967), Genèse et structure de la phénoménologie de l’esprit de Hegel.
I-II, Paris: Aubier-Montaigne.
—. (1974), Genesis and Structure of Hegel’s Phenomenology of Spirit, Evanston.
Jaeggi, Rahel (2005), Entfremdung: zur Aktualität eines sozialphilosophischen
Problems (Vol. 8), Frankfurt am Main: Campus.
Jauss, Hans Robert (1983), “The Dialogical and the Dialectical Neveu de Rameau:
How Diderot Adopted Socrates and Hegel Adopted Diderot”, in Protocol of the
colloquy of the Center for Hermeneutical Studies in Hellenistic and Modern
Culture, 27 february 1983, Berkeley, Calif: Center for Hermeneutical Studies in
Hellenistic and Modern Culture, pp. 1–29.
Johnson, Frank (ed.) (1973), Alienation: Concept, Term, and Meanings, New York:
Seminar Press.
Kallscheur, Otto; Niehues-Pröbsting, Heinrich; Eldred, Michael; Ebeling, Hans
(1984), Peter Sloterdijks ,Kritik der zynischen Vernunft‘, Frankfurt am Main:
Suhrkamp.
Laing, Ronald David (1981), The Politics of Experience and The Bird of Paradise (1967)
(reprinted ed.), Harmondsworth: Penguin.
—. (2010), The Divided Self: an Existential Study in Sanity and Madness (1960),
London: Penguin.
Magnan, André (ed.) (1993), Rameau le neveu: Textes et documents, Paris / SaintÉtienne:
CNRS éditions / Publications de l’Université de Saint-Étienne.
Marcuse, Herbert (1960), Reason and Revolution. Hegel and the Rise of Social Theory
(2nd ed.), Boston: Beacon Press.
—. (2004), „Neue Quellen zur Grundlegung des Historischen Materialismus“ (1932),
in Marcuse, Schriften, Springe: zu Klampen, pp. 509–555.
Marx, Karl (1968), „Ökonomisch-philosophische Manuskripte aus dem Jahre 1844“,
in Karl Marx, Friedrich Engels (eds.), Ergänzungsband. Schriften, Manuskripte,
Briefe bis 1844. Erster Teil. (vol. 1), Berlin: Dietz. Pp. 465–588.
Marx, Karl; Engels, Friedrich (1969), Die deutsche Ideologie (1845-46), in Marx Engels
Werke (MEW) (vol. 3), Berlin: Dietz Verlag, pp. 9–532.
Mészáros, István (2005), Marx’s theory of alienation (1970), London: Merlin Press.
Minutes of the Colloquy. (1983), Paper presented at the Hans Robert Jauss: ‘The
Dialogical and the Dialectical Neveu De Rameau: How Diderot Adopted
Socrates and Hegel Adopted Diderot’, Berkeley, California.
Pedersen, Otto (1987), “Indledning”, in Denis Diderot, Rameaus Nevø, Kbh.: Basilisk.
Price, David W. (1998), “Hegels Intertextual Dialectic. Diderot’s Le Neveu de Rameau in the Phenomenology of Spirit”, in Jon Stewart (ed.), The Phenomenology of Spirit Reader: Critical and Interpretive Essays, Albany, N.Y.: State University of New York Press, pp. 272–281.
Quante, Michael (2009), „Kommentar“, in Michael Quante (ed.), Karl Marx: Ökonomisch-philosophische Manuskripte, Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp,
pp. 209–411.
Reinicke, Helmut (1979), Register, Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
Responses. (1983), Paper presented at the Hans Robert Jauss, ‘The Dialogical and the Dialectical Neveu De Rameau: How Diderot Adopted Socrates and Hegel Adopted Diderot’, Berkeley, California.
Rosa, Hartmut (2010), Alienation and Acceleration, Malmö: NSU Press.
—. (2016), Resonanz: eine Soziologie der Weltbeziehung, Berlin: Suhrkamp.
Rousseau, Jean-Jacques (1993), Du contrat social: précédé de Discours sur l’économie politique ; et de Du contrat social, première version ; et suivi de Fragments politiques (1964) (R. Derathé ed.), Paris: Gallimard.
Sandkaulen, Birgit (2014), „Bildung bei Hegel – Entfremdung oder Versöhnung?“, in Andreas Arndt, Jure Zovko, Myriam Gerhard (eds.), Hegel gegen Hegel. Hegel-Jahrbuch, Berlin: de Gruyter, 430–438.
Schacht, Richard (1971), Alienation, London: George Allen & Unwin.
Schmidt, James (1996), „The Fool’s Truth: Diderot, Goethe, and Hegel“, Journal of the History of Ideas 57 (4), 625–644. doi:10.1353/jhi.1996.0040
Schweitzer, David; Geyer, Rudolf Felix (eds.) (1989), Alienation Theories and De-Alienation Strategies: Comparative Perspectives in Philosophy and the Social Sciences, Northwood: Science Reviews.
Sedgwick, Peter (1972), “R.D. Laing; self, sympsom and society”, in Robert Boyers, Robert Orrill (eds.), Laing and Anti-Psychiatry, Harmondsworth: Penguin,
pp. 11–47.
Shea, Louisa (2010), The Cynic Enlightenment: Diogenes in the Salon, Baltimore, Md.: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Siep, Ludwig (2000), Der Weg der Phänomenologie des Geistes, Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
Stewart, Jon (2000), The unity of Hegel’s Phenomenology of Spirit: A Systematic Interpretation, Evanston, Ill.: Northwestern University Press.
Sørensen, Asger (2015), “Not Work, but Alienation and Education. Bildung in Hegel’s Phenomenology”, Hegel Studien 49: 57–88.
—. (2019a), “Alienation Reconsidered. Criticizing non-speculative anti-essentialism”, Eikasia Revista de filosofía 89 (Monográfico: Narrativas de crisis y nuevos sujetos): 151–180.
—. (2019b), Capitalism, Alienation and Critique. Studies in Economy and Dialectics (Dialectics, Deontology and Democracy, vol. I) (L. R. Svanøe ed.), Leiden & Boston: Brill.
Taylor, Charles (1975), Hegel, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Vieweg, Klaus; Welsch, Wolfgang (2008), Hegels Phänomenologie des Geistes: ein kooperativer Kommentar zu einem Schlüsselwerk der Moderne (1 ed.), Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
White, Reginald James (1970), The Anti-Philosophers. A Study of the ‘philosophes’ in Eighteenth-Century France, London: MacMillan.
Woodcock, George (1975), Anarchism: a History of Libertarian Ideas and Movements (New with Postscript ed.), Harmondsworth: Penguin.
##submission.downloads##
Objavljeno
Kako citirati
Broj časopisa
Sekcija
Licenca
Sva prava zadržana (c) 2021 Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society
Ovaj rad je pod Creative Commons Aуторство-Nekomercijalno-Bez prerade 4.0 Internacionalna licenca.
Articles published in Philosophy and Society are open-access in accordance with the CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 License.