Activism and capitalism: On the forms of engagement

pages: 387-397

Authors

  • Aleksandar Matković Institute for Philosophy and Social Theory, University of Belgrade

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.2298/FID1602387M

Abstract

This short essay aims at providing an outline for a critical reflection on the notion of activism and to bring to attention the significance for distinguishing between different forms of engagement in contemporary neoliberal societies. The article traces the history of the notion of ‘activism’ and argues that it went hand in hand with the reduction of heterogeneous political activity to immediate generic action. In order to counter such a reduction, the article relies on the work of Ellen Meiksins Wood and her critical history of the development of the liberal conception of citizenship. In conclusion, it will be argued that the conceptual significance of the notion of capitalism is crucial for distinguishing between different forms and figures of political activity - from the ‘activist’, ‘active citizen’ and what Engin Isin termed ‘activist citizenship’. Keywords: active citizenship, activism, Ellen Meiksins Wood, Engin Isin, capitalism

References

Adorno, Theodor (1998), Critical Models: Interventions and Catchwords, New York: Columbia University Press.
Balibar, Étienne (1988), “Propositions on Citizenship”, Ethics 98 (4), 723–730.
Balibar, Étienne (2004), We, the People of Europe? Reflections on Transnational Citizenship, Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Campbell (2004), What You Do Depends on Where You Are: Community Heterogeneity and Participation, (internet), available at http://citation.allacademic.com//meta/p_mla_apa_research_citation/0/8/2/6/0/pages82606/p82606-8.php
(last accessed 01. 04. 2016)
Isin, Engin F. (1992), Being political: genealogies of citizenship, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press
Isin, Engin F. (2009), “Citizenship in flux: The figure of the activist citizen”, Subjectivity 29, 367–388.
Landa, Ishay (2010), The Apprentice’s Sorcerer, Leiden: Brill.
Marshall, Thomas Humphrey (2009), “Citizenship and Social Class” in Jeff Manza and Michael Sauder (eds.), Inequality and Society,,New York: W. W. Norton & Co., 148–154.
Meiksins Wood, Ellen (1990), “On the uses and abuses of civil society”, Socialist Register 26, 60–84.
Meiksins Wood, Ellen (1995), Democracy Against Capitalism, Cambridge: Cambridge Univeristy Press.
Mitchell, C. J. (1988), The French Legislative Assembly of 1789, Leiden: Brill.
OJTR (2005), Militancy: Highest stage of alienation, (internet) available at https://libcom.org/library/militancy-ojtr OJTR 2005 (last accessed 04. 04. 2016).
Perelman, Michael (2000), The Invention of Capitalism, London: Duke University Press.
Tamás, Gáspár Miklós (2000), On Post-Fascism, (internet) available at http://bostonreview.net/world/g-m-tam%C3%A1s-post-fascism (last accessed 03. 26.2016).
Taylor, Astra (2013), Against Activism, (internet) available at http://thebaffler.com/salvos/against-activism/rosenwald_activist0201b30-3_72 (last accessed 03.24. 2016)

Published

10.05.2016

How to Cite

Matković, A. (2016) “Activism and capitalism: On the forms of engagement: pages: 387-397”, Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society. Belgrade, Serbia, 27(2). doi: 10.2298/FID1602387M.

Issue

Section

ENGAGING REFLEXIVITY, REFLECTING ENGAGEMENT