Classical Critical Theory, Epistemological Dialectics and General Economy. Reply to Criticism Raised in Belgrade and Shanghai

Asger Sørensen

doi:10.2298/FID2101040S

Authors

Asger Sørensen Department of Educational Philosophy and General Education, Aarhus University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.2298/FID2101040S

Keywords:

dialectics, capitalism, critical theory, epistemology, negation, general economy

Abstract

In my response, I initially defend my preference for classical Critical Theory, emphasizing its continued relevance in capitalist modernity, stressing that the epistemological approach does not imply dogmatism with regards to scientific theory or Historical Materialism, just as it does not imply closure with regards to political democracy. When it comes to the dialectics of the classics, I also defend an epistemological approach, arguing that the dialectics aiming for truth implies critique and negativity. However, confronted with the duality of transcendental ideas and historical relativity, I express my confidence in human intuition. Following Hegel, determinate negation must sublate the intuitively conceived universality to a new conception that contains the result of the negation. Finally, I do not see how the conceptual aporias of general economy can be solved by the current political degrowth project. Still, politics is what we need more of, namely social democracy.

References

Águila, Rafael del (1997), “Epílogo. El centauro transmoderno: Liberalismo y democracia en la democracia liberal”, in Historia de la teoría política, vol. VI, Fernando Vallespin (ed.), Madrid: Alianza, pp. 549–643.

Bataille, Georges (1973), OEuvres Complètes, vol. V, Paris: Gallimard.

—. (1976a), “La Souveraineté (1954)”, in Georges Bataille, OEuvres Complètes, vol. VIII, Paris: Gallimard, pp. 243–456.

—. (1976b), “La Souveraineté (1956)”, in Georges Bataille, OEuvres Complètes, vol. VIII, Paris: Gallimard, pp. 608–620.

—. (1987), “L’érotisme (1957)”, in Georges Bataille, OEuvres Complètes, vol. X, Paris: Gallimard, pp. 7–270.

Campillo, Antonio (2001), Contra la economía. Ensayos sobre Bataille, Granada: Comares.

Cirne-Lima, Carlos (2019), Dialektik für Anfänger, München: Karl Alber & Wbg Edition.

D’Alisa, Giacomo; Demaria, Federico; Kallis, Giorgos (eds.) (2015), Decrecimiento.

Un vocabulario para una nueva era, Barcelona: Icaria editorial.

Derrida, Jacques (1967), “De l’économie restreinte à l’économie générale. Un hégélianisme sans reserve”, L’arc 32: 24–44.

Durkheim, Émile (1950/1997), Leçons de Sociologie (1950), Paris: P.U.F.

—. (2006), L’éducation morale (1925), Paris: Ed. Fabert.

Ferrara, Alessandro (2015), The Democratic Horizon. Hyperpluralism and the Renewal of Political Liberalism, New York: Cambridge University Press.

Fogarasi, Béla (1972), Dialektische Logik: Mit einer Darstellung erkenntnistheoretischer Grundbegriffe (1954), Rotdruck, vol. 18, s’Gravenhage: Van Eversdijck, 1972.

Hegel, G.W.F. (1970), Phänomenologie des Geistes (1807), in G. W. F. Hegel, Werke in 20 Bänden, vol. 3, Eva Moldenhauer and Karl Markus Michel (eds.), Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.

Holz, Hans Heinz (2011), Dialektik. Problemgeschichte von der Antike bis zur Gegenwart, vol. III-V, Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.

Horkheimer, Max (1988a), “Zum Problem der Wahrheit (1935)”, in Max Horkheimer, Schriften 1931-1936, Gesammelte Schriften, vol. 3, Frankfurt am Main: Fischer, pp. 228–276.

—. (1988b), “Traditionelle und Kritische Theorie (1937)”, in Max Horkheimer, Schriften 1936-1941, Alfred Schmidt (ed.), in Horkheimer, Gesammelte Schriften, vol. 4, Frankfurt am Main: Fischer, pp. 162–216.

Lemmon, E. J. (1962), “Moral Dilemmas”, Philosophical Review 71 (2): 139–158.

Lurson, Guillaume (2018), “Georges Bataille: Mystique et expérience intérieure”, Revue de métaphysique et de morale 99 (3): 307–322.

Marcuse, Herbert (1969), “A Note on Dialectics (1960)”, in Herbert Marcuse, Reason and Revolution (1941), Boston: Beacon Press, pp. vii–xiv.

—. (1972), Counterrevolution and Revolt, Boston: Beacon Press.

—. (2000), Reason and Revolution. Hegel and the Rise of Social Theory (1941/1955), London and New York: Routledge.

—. (2001), “The Containment of Social Change in Industrial Society (1965)”, in Herbert Marcuse, Towards a Critical Theory of Society, Douglas Kellner (ed.), Collected Papers, vol. 2, London: Routledge, pp. 81–93.

Marx, Karl; Engels, Frederick (1988), The Economic and Philosophic Manuscripts of 1844 and the Communist Manifesto, Amherst, New York: Prometheus Books.

Ortega-Esquembre, César (2021), “Sørensen, A. (2019), Capitalism, Alienation and Critique, Boston: Brill”, Daimon. Revista Internacional de Filosofía 82: 222–226.

Rasmussen, David M. (2004), “Critical Theory and Philosophy (1996)”, in David M. Rasmussen and James Swindal (eds.), Critical Theory, vol. 2, London: Sage, pp. 3–28.

—. (2019), “Critical Theory: Reflections on Capitalism, Alienation and Critique by Asger Sorensen”, in Comparative Philosophy & Modernization of Social Governance, East China Normal University, Minhang Campus, Shanghai: ECNU, pp. 5–10.

Romano, Onofrio (2015), “Dépense”, in Giacomo D’Alisa, Federico Demaria and Giorgos Kallis (eds.), Decrecimiento. Un vocabulario para una nueva era, Barcelona: Icaria editorial, pp. 138–142.

Röd, Wolfgang (1974), Dialektische Philosophie der Neuzeit, Vol. 1–2, München: C.H. Beck.

Sørensen, Asger (2010), Om Videnskabelig Viden – Gier, Ikker Og Ismer. Frederiksberg: Forlaget Samfundslitteratur.

—. (2012a), I Lyset Af Bataille – Politisk Filosofiske Studier, Johannes Sohlman (ed.), Rævens Sorte Bibliotek, vol. 84, København: Politisk Revy.

—. (2012b), “Durkheim: The Goal of Education in a Democratic State Is Autonomy”, in Peter Kemp and Asger Sørensen (eds.), Politics in Education, Philosophy of Education, vol. 2, Paris, Berlin: Institut international de philosophie, Lit Verlag, pp. 183–198.

—. (2013), “Justice and Democracy. Some Preliminary Reflections”, in Francisco Javier López Frías, Paulina Morales Aguilera, Raúl Francisco Sebastián Solanes, Marta Gil Blasco, Mikel Arteta Arilla, Ana Mª Costa Alcaraz, Xavier Gimeno Monfort et al. (eds.), Bioética, Neuroética, Libertad Y Justicia, Granada: Editorial Comares, pp. 494–508.

—. (2014), “Approaching Political Philosophy through the Critique of Liberalism”, Acta Politologica 6 (3): 264–278.

—. (2015a), “From Critique of Ideology to Politics: Habermas on Bildung”, Ethics and Education 10 (2): 252–270.

—. (2015b), “Cosmopolitan Democracy and the State. Reflections on the Need for Ideals and Imagination”, Journal of Constitutionalism & Human Rights 3–4 (8): 8–19.

—. (2015c), “The Law of Peoples in the Age of Empire: The Post-Modern Resurgence of the Ideology of Just War”, Journal of the Philosophy of International Law 6 (1): 19–37.

—. (2016), “Cosmopolitanism – Not a ‘Major Ideology’, but Still an Ideology”, Philosophy & Social Criticism 42 (2): 220–224.

—. (2017a), “Introducing Theme and Articles”, in Asger Sørensen (ed.), Kant and the Establishment of Peace, Danish Yearbook of Philosophy 50: 7–45.

—. (2017b), “The Privilege of Participation”, Philosophy & Social Criticism 43 (3): 286–287.

—. (2019a), Capitalism, Alienation and Critique. Studies in Economy and Dialectics (Dialectics, Deontology and Democracy, vol. I), Studies in Moral Philosophy, vol. 13, Thom Brooks (ed.), Leiden, Boston: Brill.

—. (2019b), “Alienation Reconsidered. Criticizing Non-Speculative Anti-Essentialism”, Eikasia: revista de filosofía 89 (Monográfico: Narrativas de crisis y nuevos sujetos): 151–180.

—. (2020a), “Bildung as Democratic Opinion and Will Formation. Habermas Beyond Habermas”, in Rethinking Ethical-Political Education, Torill Strand (ed.), Contemporary Philosophies and Theories in Education, Berlin: Springer, pp. 137–151.

—. (2020b), “Pour un élargissement de l’éducation à la citoyenneté démocratique à travers la Bildung: Klafki défiant le 21ème siècle”, Nordicum-Mediterraneum 15 (3).

Tormey, Simon (2013), Anti-Capitalism: A Beginner’s Guide. Oxford: Oneworld.

Vieweg, Klaus; Welsch, Wolfgang (eds.) (2008), Hegels Phänomenologie des Geistes: Ein kooperativer Kommentar zu einem Schlüsselwerk der Moderne, Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.