Otto Bauer: The idea of nation as a plural community and the question of territorial and non-territorial autonomy
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.2298/FID2003287MKeywords:
Austromarxism, nation, national minorities, multinational state, territorial and non- territorial autonomyAbstract
This article presents a detailed analysis of the concept of nation in the work of Austro-Marxist Otto Bauer. In his view, the nation is conceived as an evolutionary process of political, open and plural construction. His work also unravels the connections of nation with a plurinational democratic state, which was at the time a novel political and institutional vision. The article argues that his work is very relevant today, with rising complexity of the new contexts of global society and the multiplication of migrations and refugees; and the need to respond through an accommodation of minorities through mechanisms of territorial and non-territorial autonomy. Much of these concerns form the substance of Otto Bauer’s work.
References
Bauer, Otto (1975-1980), Werkausgabe, 9 vols. Vienna: Europaverlag.
—. (1912), “Die Bedingungen der Nationalen Assimilation”, Werkausgabe 9, pp. 596–624.
—. (1907), Die Nationalitätenfrage und die Sozialdemokratie. Vienna: Ignaz Brand.
Blum, Mark E. and William Smaldone (2015), Austro-Marxism. The Ideology of Unity. Austro-Marxist Theory and Strategy. Boston: Brill.
Bourdet, Yvon (1968), Otto Bauer et la Révolution. Paris: EDI.
Czerwinska-Schupp, Ewa (2005), Otto Bauer: Studien zur social-politischen Philosophie. Frankfurt: Peter Lang Verlag.
Erk, Jan (2015), “Non-Territorial Millets in Ottoman History”, in Malloy, T. H. and F. Palermo (eds.), Minority Accommodation through Territorial and Non-Territorial Autonomy, pp. 119–131.
Hänish, Ernst (2011), Der grosse Illusionist. Otto Bauer 1881-1938. Vienna: Böhlau.
Haupt, George, Michel Lowy and Claude Weil (1974), Les marxistes et la question nationale 1848-1914. Paris: Maspero.
Leisse, Olaf (2012). Der Untergang des östrreichischen Imperiums. Otto Bauer und die Nationalitätenfrage in der Habsburger Monarchie. Marburg an der Lahn: Tectum.
Máiz, Ramón (2012), The Inner Frontier. The Place of Nation in the Political Theory of Democracy and Federalism. Frankfurt a. M.: Peter Lang.
Malloy, Tove H. and Francesco Palermo (ed.). (2015), Minority Accommodation through Territorial and Non-Territorial Autonomy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Malloy, Tove H., Alexander Osipov and Bálazs Vizi (eds.) (2015), Managing Diversity Through Non-Territorial Autonomy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Meinecke, Friedrich (1963), Weltbürgertum und Nationalstaat. Munich: Oldenbourg.
Miller, David (2020), Is Self-determination a Dangerous illusion? Cambridge: Polity.300 │ Ramón
Molnár, Miklós and André Reszler (eds.) (1989), Le Génie de L’Autriche-Hongrie. Paris:PUF.
Momsen, Hans (1979), Arbeitbewegung und nationale Frage. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.
Nimni, Ephraim (2015), “Minorities and the Limits of Liberal Democracy. Democracy and Non-Territorial Autonomy”, in Malloy, T. H. and F. Palermo (eds.), Minority Accommodation through Territorial and Non-Territorial Autonomy, pp. 73–98.
—. (ed.) (2005), National Cultural Autonomy and its Contemporary Critics. London: Routledge.
Nimni, Ephraim, Alexander Osipov and David J. Smith (eds.) (2013), The Challenge of Non-Territorial Autonomy. Oxford: Peter Lang.
Osipov, Alexander (2013), “Non-Territorial Autonomy during and after Communism”. Journal on Ethnopolitics and Minority Issues in Europe 12 (1): 7–26.
Renner, Karl (1994), Schriften, hrgb. Anton Pelinka. Vienna: Residenz.
Smith, David (2013), “Non-Territorial Autonomy and Political Community in Contemporary Central and Eastern Europe”, Journal on Ethnopolitics and Minority Issues in Europe 12 (1): 27–55.
Stilz, Anna (2019), Territorial Sovereignty. New York: Oxford University Press.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Articles published in Philosophy and Society are open-access in accordance with the CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 License.