Engagement and political institutions: the case of ombudsman

Authors

  • Luka Glušac Institute for Philosophy and Social Theory, University of Belgrade

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.2298//FID1904493G

Keywords:

engagement, institutions, political institutions, institutionalization, institutionalism, oversight bodies, independent bodies, ombudsman

Abstract

 In this article, I examine the relationship between engagement and political institutions by using the example of the creation and development of the ombudsman institution. The article starts with the short introduction to key theoretical views about institutions, political institutions and institutionalization. Then, I concentrate on how political institutions change, i.e. whether they can be changed through social engagement and whether and when we can actually say that they are originally created by an engagement. By using the case of ombudsman, I explore if political institutions can engage themselves and under what conditions, that is, whether are institutions characterized by in-built permanent reflexivity possible.

References

Almond, Gabriel A. and James S. Coleman (1960), The Politics of the Developing Areas. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Becker, Howard (1960), “Notes on the Concept of Commitment“, American Journal of Sociology, 66(1): 32–40.
Blondel, Jean (2008), “About Institutions, Mainly, but not Exclusively, Political“, in Sarah A. Binder, R. A. W. Rhodes, and Bert A. Rockman (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Political Institutions, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 717–730.
Bojanić, Petar and Edward Đorđević (2016), “Engagement + (Joint) Commitment: On the Obligation to Act Together”, Philosophy and Society 2: 449–452.
Bojanić, Petar and Miloš Ćipranić (eds.) (2018), Socijalni i negativni socijalni akti, Beograd and Novi Sad: IFDT i Akademska knjiga.
Cvejić, Igor (2016), “The Forms of Social Engagement Regarding the Subject of Import”, Philosophy and Society 2: 332–342.
Dash, Mike (2012), “The Blazing Career and Mysterious Death of ‘The Swedish Meteor’”, Smithsonian, September 17, https://www.smithsonianmag.com/history/the-blazing-career-and-mysterious-death-of-the-swedish-meteor-39695356/ (accessed 30 August 2019).
Easton, David (1953), The Political System: An Inquiry into the State of Political Science. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
Easton, David (1965), A Systems Analysis of Political Life. Hoboken: John Wiley.
Fiket, Irena i Jelena Ćeriman (2018), Angažman unutar porodice? Studija o akademskim radnicama Univerziteta u Beogradu, izlaganje, 12. decembar 2018, Beograd: IFDT, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Sq3vEbYWZUg (accessed 30 August 2019).
Finer, Samuel E. (1999), The History of Government from the Earliest Times. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Gallie, Walter Bryce (1956), “Essentially Contested Concepts”, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 56: 167–198.
Gilbert, Margaret (2013), “Commitment”, in Hugh LaFollette (ed.), International Encyclopedia of Ethics. Hoboken: Wiley.
Glušac, Luka (2018a), „Uticaj konstitucionalizacije ombudsmana na njihovo funkcionisanje u tranzicionim državama“, in Biljana Đorđević (ed.), Konstitucionalizam i ustavni dizajn u demokratskoj recesiji, Beograd: FPN i Udruženje za političke nauke Srbije, pp. 311–326.
Glušac, Luka (2018b), “National Human Rights Institutions and Oversight of the Security Services”, Journal of Human Rights Practice, 10(1): 58–82.
Glušac, Luka (2016), „Razvoj nacionalnih institucija za ljudska prava“, in Đorđe Stojanović i Mladen Lišanin (ed.), Srbija i institucionalni modeli javnih politika: problemi i perspektive, Beograd: Institut za političke studije, pp. 265-311.
Goodin, Robert E. and Hans‐Dieter Klingemann (1996), “Political Science: The Discipline”, in Robert E. Goodin and Hans-Dieter Klingemann (eds.), A New Handbook of Political Science, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 3–49.Goodin, Robert E. (ed) (1996), The Theory of Institutional Design. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Hatton, Ragnhild (1968), Charles XII of Sweden. London: The Camelot Press.
Huntington, Samuel P. (1968), Political Order in Changing Societies. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Institute for Philosophy and Social Theory (IFDT), Research Platform of Social Engagement Studies, http://www.ifdt.bg.ac.rs/studije-angazovanosti-2/ (accessed 30 August 2019).
Lang, C. McKenna (2011), “A Western King and an Ancient Notion: Reflections on the Origins of Ombudsing”, Journal of Conflictology 2(2): 56–65.
March, James G. and Johan P. Olsen (1989), Rediscovering Institutions: The Organizational Basis of Politics. New York: The Free Press.
–. (1984), “The New Institutionalism: Organizational Factors in Political Life”, The American Political Science Review 78(3): 734–749;
North, Douglas P. (1990), Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Roland, Gérard (2004), “Understanding Institutional Change: Fast-moving and Slow-moving Institutions”, Studies in Comparative International Development 38(4): 109–131.
Rothstein, Bo (1996), “Political Institutions: An Overview”, in Robert E. Goodin and Hans-Dieter Klingemann (eds), A New Handbook of Political Science, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 133–166.Sartori, Giovanni (1984), Social Science Concepts. London: SAGE.
Sladeček, Michal (2008), Politička zajednica. Beograd: IFDT.
Truman, David (1962), The Governmental Process: Political Interests and Public Opinion. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
Vranić, Bojan (2012), „Da li su političke institucije otporne na promene“, Politeia, 4, 247-256.
Wieslander, Bengt (1999), The Parliamentary Ombudsman in Sweden. Stockholm: The Bank of Sweden Tercentenary Foundation & Gidlunds Bokforlag.
Zaharijević, Adriana (2016), “Pawning and Challenging in Concert: Engagement as a Field of Study”, Philosophy and Society 2: 311–321.

Published

27.12.2019

How to Cite

Glušac, L. (2019) “Engagement and political institutions: the case of ombudsman”, Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society. Belgrade, Serbia, 30(4), pp. 493–508. doi: 10.2298//FID1904493G.