Against Deflation of the Subject
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.2298/FID1704102NKeywords:
deflation, subject of experience, panpsychism, combination problem, pre-reflective self-awarenessAbstract
I will argue that accounts of mineness and pre-reflective self-awareness can be helpful to panpsychists in solving the combination problems. A common strategy in answering the subject combination problem in panpsychism is to deflate the subject, eliminating or reducing subjects to experience. Many modern panpsychist theories are deflationist or endorse deflationist accounts of subjects, such as Parfit’s reductionism of personal identity and G. Strawson’s identity view. To see if there can be deflation we need to understand what the subject/self is. One aspect of consciousness left unexplored and unappreciated by panpsychist theories is pre-reflective self-consciousness/self-awareness. Theories of the self, inspired by phenomenology, that are serious about subjectivity, could be of use in arguing against the deflationary reductionism of the experiencing subject. These theories show that there is more to the subject of experience than just its experiences (qualities). Even without arguing for any precise account of the nature of the self, it can be shown what phenomenology of subjective character of consciousness and pre-reflective self-awareness contributes to the combination problem debate.
References
Bayne, Tim. & Chalmers, David (2003), „What is the Unity of Consciousness?“ in A. Cleeremans ed. The Unity of Consciousness: Binding, Integration, Dissociation, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 23-58.
Bayne, Tim (2004), „Self-Consciousness and the Unity of Consciousness“, The Monist 87 (2):219-236.
Chalmers, David J. (2015), „Panpsychism and panprotopsychism“ in Consciousness in the Physical World: Perspectives on Russellian Monism. (eds.) Alter, T., Nagasawa, Y., Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 246-277.
Chalmers, David J. (2016), „The Combination Problem for Panpsychism“ in Panpsychism, eds. Bruntrup, G. and Jaskolla, L., Oxford University Press, pp. 179-214
Coleman, Sam (2013), ‘The Real Combination Problem: Panpsychism, Micro-Subjects, and Emergence“, Erkenntnis 79:19–44.
Dainton, Barry (2008), The Phenomenal Self, Oxford: Oxford University Press
Dainton, Barry (2011), „Review of Consciousness and its Place in Nature“, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 83:238-261.
Dainton, Barry (2012), „Self-Hood and the Flow of Experience“, Grazer Philosophische Studien 84:161-200
Eddington, Arthur (1928), The Nature of the Physical World, Cambridge University Press.
Fasching, Wolfgang (2009), “The Mineness of Experience“, Continental Philosophy Review, 42/2: 131–48.
Goff, Philip (2009), „Why Panpsychism Doesn’t Help Us Explain Consciousness“, Dialectica 63:289-311.
Hume, David (1739–40/1978). A Treatise of Human Nature, ed. L. A. Selby-Bigge and P. H. Nidditch, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
James, William (1890/1981), The Principles of Psychology, 2 vols. New York: Dover.
James, William (1912), “A World of Pure Experience” in Essays in Radical Empiricism, New York: Longman Green and Co., pp. 39-91.
Kriegel, Uriah (2005), „Naturalizing Subjective Character“. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 71 (1):23-57.
Levine, Joseph (2001), Purple Haze: The Puzzle of Consciousness Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Mørch, Hedda Hassel (2014), Panpsychism and Causation: A New Argument and a Solution to the Combination Problem. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Oslo.
Nagel, Thomas (1974), “What Is It Like to Be a Bat?”, Philosophical Review 83, 435–450.
Nagel, Thomas (1979), „Panpsychism“ in his Mortal questions, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Nida-Rümelin, Martine (2014), “Basic intentionality, primitive awareness, and awareness of oneself” in A. Reboul (ed.), Mind, Values and Metaphysics. Philosophical Papers dedicated to Kevin Mulligan,
Parfit, Derek (1971), „Personal Identity“. The Philosophical Review 80: 3–27.
Roelofs, Luke (2015), Combining Minds: A Defence of the Possibility of Experiential Combination, Doctoral Dissertation, University of Toronto.
Schaffer, Jonathan (2010), ‘Monism: The Priority of the Whole’, Philosophical Review 119, pp. 31–76.
Seager, William (2010), „Panpsychism, Aggregation and Combinatorial Infusion“. Mind and Matter, V8:2, pp. 167-184.
Shoemaker, Sydney (1996), The First-Person Perspective and Other Essays. New York: Cambridge University Press
Siewert, Charles, Consciousness and Self-Consciousness, Remarks on Zahavi’s Self and Others, (PowerPoint presentation)
Siewert, Charles (2013), „Phenomenality and self-awareness“ in U. Kriegel (ed.), Phenomenal Intentionality, Oxford University Press, 235–259.
Strawson, Galen (2006), „Panpsychism? Reply to Commentators with a Celebration of Descartes“. Journal of Consciousness Studies 13 (10-11):184-280.
Strawson, Galen (2009), Selves: An Essay in Revisionary Metaphysics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Strawson, Galen (2010), „Fundamental Singleness: How to Turn the 2nd Paralogism into a Valid Argument“. Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 85 (2010): 61–92.
Turausky, Keith (2014), “Wherever You Go, There You Are: On Individuative Subjective Phenomenology,” Essays in Philosophy: Vol. 15: Iss. 2, Article 2.
Zahavi, Dan (2005), Subjectivity and Selfhood: Investigating the First-Person Perspective, Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
Zahavi, Dan (2014), Self and Other: Exploring Subjectivity, Empathy, and Shame. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Zahavi, Dan (forthcoming), „Consciousness and (minimal) selfhood: Getting clearer on for- me-ness and mineness“, in U. Kriegel (ed.): The Oxford Handbook of the Philosophy of Consciousness. Oxford University Press
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Articles published in Philosophy and Society are open-access in accordance with the CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 License.
