Do intellectuals matter?: Proposal for a study of influence: pages: 343-355

Gazela Pudar Draško

doi:10.2298/FID1602343P

Authors

Gazela Pudar Draško

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.2298/FID1602343P

Abstract

The paper strives to explore the (non)existence of influence of intellectuals in society. Intellectuals are seen as a loose elite network of specific social actors who possess advance knowledge or creativity recognized in the cultural field of academia and/or art, hold a certain authority or power to be heard in the public, and who are publicly engaged. The aim of the paper is to fill the gap in the sociology of intellectuals and offer a possible framework for empirical research of intellectuals’ influence. This framework is operationalized using three levels: self-evaluation of their own influence, estimation of their social status and intellectual authority over (primarily) elites, and finally external “objectified” measures. The author hereby calls on the testing of the proposed model and any proposals for its improvement. Keywords: intellectuals, engagement, influence, power, social network

References

Andres, A. (2009) Measuring Academic Research: How to Undertake a Bibliometric Study, Oxford: Chandos Publishing Brym, R. and Nakhaie, M.R. (2009) “Professional, Critical, Policy, and Public Academics in Canada”, Canadian Journal of Sociology Vol. 34, no. 3: 655-669
Burawoy, M. (2005) „For Public Sociology: 2004 Presidential Address", American Sociological Review, vol 70: 4-28
Cavanagh, A. (2007), Sociology in the Age of Internet, Maidenhead: Open University Press
Cavignioli, D. (2015) “Onfray, Fassin, Bruckner. ce que les intellos mediatiques pensent des medias”, http://bibliobs.nouvelobs.com/actualites/20151217. OBS1582/onfray-fassin-bruckner-ce-que-les-intellos-mediatiques-pensent-des- medias.html, accessed on 06.03.2016.
Collini, S. (2006) Absent Minds: Intellectuals in Britain, Oxford: Oxford University Press
Collins, R. (2002) The Sociology of Philosophies: A Global Theory of Intellectual Change, Cambridge: Harvard University Press Dahrendorf, R. (2008) Iskusenja neslobode: intelektualci u doba kusnje. The temptations of unfreedom: Erasmus intellectuals in the age of totalitarianism, Zagreb: Prometej
Festinger, L. (1957) A theory of cognitive dissonance, Evanston: Row & Peterson Goldfarb, J.C. (1998) Civility and Subversion: The Intellectual in Democratic Society, New York, Cambridge University Press Human Rights Watch (2015) Turkey: Academics Jailed For Signing Petition, https:// www.hrw.org/news/2016/03/16/turkey-academics-jailed-signing-petition, accessed on 18.03.2016.
Kadushin, C. (2012) Understanding Social Networks: Theories, Concepts and Findings, New York: Oxford University Press
Keller, E. B. and Berry, J. L. (2003) The influentials: One American in ten tells the other nine how to vote, where to eat, and what to buy, New York: Simon & Schuster
Krtolica, I., Zaharijevic A. and J. Vasiljevic (2016) “Engaging Reflexivity, Reflecting Engagement: Why are we in this together?”, Filozofija i drustvo 27(2): 305-310
Mannheim, K. (1936), Ideology and Utopia, London: Routledge & Kegan Paul McPherson, M. Smith-Lovin, L. Cook, J.M. (2001) “Birds of a Feather: Homophily in Social Networks”, Annual Review of Sociology, No. 27:415-444 Nisbet, E. (2006) “The Engagement Model of Opinion Leadership: Testing Validity within a European Context”, International Journal of Public Opinion Research, Vol. 18 (1): 3-30
Piketty, T. (2014) Capital in the Twenty-First Century, London: Harvard University Press
Posner, R. (2001) Public Intellectuals: A Study of Decline, Cambridge: Harvard University Press
Pudar Drasko, G. (2015) „(Re)acting together: Grexit as revival of intellectuals" Filozofija i drustvo, Vol. 26, no. 4: 934-948
Pudar Drasko, G. (2016) Socio-Politically Influential Intellectuals and Their Understanding of the National in Serbia after 2000, PhD Dissertation, Belgrade: Faculty of Philosophy
Sassower, R. (2014) The Price of Public Intellectuals, London: Palgrave Macmillan UK
Valente, T.W. (2010) Social Networks and Health: Models, Methods, and Applications, New York: Oxford University Press
Valente, T.W. and Pumpuang, I! (2007) “Identifying Opinion Leaders to Promote Behavior Change”, Health Education & Behavior, Vol. 34 (6): 881-896 Wright Mills, C. (1959) The Sociological Imagination, New York: Oxford University Press
Wright Mills, C. and Horowitz, I.L. (1963) Power, Politics and People: The Collected Essays of C. Wright Mills, New York: Oxford University Press