Social critique and engagement between universalism, anti-authoritarianism and diagnosis of domination: pages: 356-372

Marjan Ivković

doi:10.2298/FID1602356I

Authors

Marjan Ivković Institute for Philosophy and Social Theory, University of Belgrade

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.2298/FID1602356I

Keywords:

engagement, import, action, plural agents, we-intentions

Abstract

The paper discusses a particular ‘isomorphy’ between two forms of social criticism: the ‘holistic’ theoretical social critique represented by such authors as Jürgen Habermas and Axel Honneth and ‘collective social engagement’ represented by such civic movements as the ‘We Won’t Let Belgrade D(r)own’ initiative in contemporary Serbia, which the paper tries to distinguish from more conventional forms of popular protest. This ‘isomorphy’, the paper argues, consists in a tension between three distinct imperatives of the justification of critique - those of normative universalism, epistemological anti-authoritarianism, and diagnosis of social domination - produced by the attempts of both the ‘holistic’ social critics and the collectively engaged actors to simultaneously respond to all three imperatives. After presenting the three types of theoretical critique that crystallize around each imperative, the paper discusses the internal tension that arises in the works of ‘holistic’ theoretical critics and then identifies the same kind of tension in the ‘We Won’t Let Belgrade D(r)own’ initiative. The tension in the movement’s critique is outlined through a brief analysis of the activists’ discourse as articulated in the bulletin We Won’t Let Belgrade D(r)own issued in March 2015. Since the examples also suggest that collective engagement is better than theoretical critique at keeping this tension ‘productive’, the paper finally offers some tentative thoughts on the possible reasons for this difference. Keywords: isomorphy, tension, critique, justification, engagement, universalism, contextualism, diagnosis, Serbia

References

Adorno, Theodor (2001), The Culture Industry: Selected Essays on Mass Culture. London: Routledge.
Adorno, Theodor (1981), Negative Dialectics. New York: Bloomsbury Academic. Alexander, Jeffrey C. and Pia Lara, Maria (1996), “Honneth’s New Critical Theory of Recognition”, New Left Review I/220: 126-136.
Benhabib, Seyla (2004), The Rights of Others: Aliens, Residents and Citizens. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Boltanski, Luc (2011), On Critique: A Sociology of Emancipation. Cambridge: Polity Press. Butler, Judith, Laclau, Ernesto and Zizek, Slavoj (2000), Contingency, Hegemony, Universality: Contemporary Dialogues on the Left. London: Verso.
Cohen, Jean L. (2012), Globalization and Sovereignty: Rethinking Legality, Legitimacy and Constitutionalism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Cohen, Jean L. and Arato, Andrew (1994), Civil Society and Political Theory. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Cooke, Maeve (2006), Re-Presenting the Good Society. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Deranty, Jean-Philippe (2010), “Critique of Political Economy and Contemporary Critical Theory: A Defense of Honneth’s Theory of Recognition”, in Hans- Christoph Schmidt am Busch and Christopher F. Zurn (eds.), The Philosophy of Recognition: Historical and Contemporary Perspectives. Plymouth: Lexington Books, p. 285-317.
Deranty, Jean-Philippe (2009), Beyond Communication: A Critical Study of Axel Honneth’s Social Philosophy. Leiden: Brill.
Forst, Rainer (2003), Toleranz im Konflikt. Berlin: Suhrkamp.
Forst, Rainer (2002), Contexts of Justice: Political Philosophy Beyond Liberalism and Communitarianism. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Habermas, Jurgen (1987), The Theory of Communicative Action, Volume 2: Lifeworld and System: A Critique of Functionalist Reason. Boston: Beacon Press.
Habermas, Jurgen (1984), The Theory of Communicative Action, Volume 1: Reason and the Rationalization of Society. Boston: Beacon Press.
Honneth, Axel (2009), Pathologies of Reason: On the Legacy of Critical Theory. New York: Columbia University Press.
Honneth, Axel (1996), The Struggle for Recognition: The Moral Grammar of Social Conflicts. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Honneth, Axel (1991), Critique of Power: Reflective Stages in a Critical Social Theory. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Ivkovic, Marjan (2014), “Dva pokusaja utemeljenja drustvene kritike u perspektivama ‘obicnih’ drustvenih aktera: kriticka teorija Nensi Frejzer i Aksela Honeta”, Filozofija i Drustvo 25 (3): 29-50.
Laclau, Ernesto and Mouffe, Chantal (2001), Hegemony and Socialist Strategy: Towards a Radical Democratic Politics. London: Verso.
Marcuse, Herbert (1991), One-Dimensional Man: Studies in the Ideology of Advanced Industrial Society. Boston: Beacon Press.
Marcuse, Herbert (1974), Eros and Civilization: A Philosophical Inquiry into Freud. Boston: Beacon Press.
“Ne da(vi)mo Beograd!” (internet), available at: https://nedavimobeograd.wordpress. com (viewed 29. March 2016).
Rorty, Richard (1989), Contingency, Irony, and Solidarity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Walzer, Michael (1983), Spheres of Justice: A Defense of Pluralism and Equality. New York: Basic Books.
Zurn, Christopher F (2010), “Introduction”, in Hans-Christoph Schmidt am Busch and Christopher F Zurn (eds.), The Philosophy of Recognition: Historical and Contemporary Perspectives. Plymouth: Lexington Books.