Trust and ‘Being Moved’ as Forms of Engagement in Situations of Uncertainty

Igor Cvejić

doi:10.2298/FID2302248C

Authors

Igor Cvejić University of Belgrade, Institute for Philosophy and Social Theory

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.2298/FID2302248C

Keywords:

engagement, trust, being moved, uncertainty, emotion

Abstract

The main aim of this paper is to put emphasis on the role of trust and the emotion of being moved in a situation of crisis. I do not intend to address the general role, or all roles, these emotions might have in a crisis situation. My focus is rather on the role of these emotions in we-formation, presupposing that mutual engagement between the actors is the crucial constituent through which first-person singular shifts to first-person plural. I rely on Bennet Helm’s argument on how trust can function as an invitation to delineate communal norms in the new circumstances of uncertainty. Accordingly, by being trusted by other(s), the addressee is entitled to the expected responsibility for a situation: (1) the addressee is entitled as a member of a group (of us who are responsible in the situation); (2) the addressee is exposed to pressure to respond to a situation with responsibility. In the second part, I adopt Cova’s and Deonna’s argument about the function of the emotion of being moved. I suggest that in such a situation “being moved” expresses the readiness to reorganize one’s hierarchy of values in the light of new circumstances of mutual dependency. Taken together, trust and being moved portray the outline of mutual engagement between the actors in a crisis situation which aims to establish new communal norms and values.

References

Badiou, Alain (2003), Saint Paul: The Foundation of Universalism, Stanford: Stanford University Press.

Boltanski, Luc (2011), On Critique. A Sociology of Emancipation, Paris: Polity.

Bratman, Michael E. (1993), “Shared Intention”, Ethics 104 (1): 97–113.

Cova, Florian; Deonna, Julien A. (2014), “Being Moved”, Philosophical Studies 164: 447–466.

Cvejić, Igor (2016), “The Forms of Social Engagement Regarding the Subject of the Import”, Philosophy and Society 27 (2): 332–342.

Cvejić Igor; Ivković, Marjan; Prodanović, Srđan (2023), “Contingency and Social Change: Collective Engagement in Conditions of Radical Uncertainty”, Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 53 (2): 296–311.

Frijda, Nico H. (2007), The Laws of Emotion, New York: Routledge.

Gilbert, Margaret (1992), On Social Facts, Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.

Helm, Bennet W. (2001), Emotional Reason: Deliberation, Motivation and the Nature of Values, New York: Cambridge University Press.

—. (2009), Love, Friendship, and the Self: Intimacy, Identification and the Social Nature of Persons, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

—. (2017), Communities of Respect: Grounding Responsibility, Authority and Dignity, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Kenny, Anthony (2003), Action, Emotion and Will, London, New York: Routledge.

Konečni, Vladimir J. (2005), “The Aesthetic Trinity: Awe, Being Moved, Thrills”, Bulletin of Psychology and the Arts (5), 27–44. Prevod na srpski: (2018) “Estetsko trojstvo: ushićenost, ganutost, žmarci”, u Priroda vrhunskog estetskog doživljaja (prir. Nebojša Grubor), Beograd: Draslar.

Loidolt, Sophie (2018), Phenomenology of Plurality: Hannah Arendt on Political Intersubjectivity, New York: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group.

Losoncz, Alpar; Losoncz, Mark (2020), “The State of Exception at the Legal Boundaries: Re-Evaluation Of A Critical Concept”, Glasnik advokatske komore Vojvodine 92 (4): 538– 571.

McGeer, Victoria (2008), “Trust, Hope and Empowerment”, Australasian Journal of Philosophy 86 (2): 237–254.

Schilbach, Leonhard; Timmermans, Bert; Reddy, Vasudevi; Costall, Alan; Bente, Gary; Schlicht, Tobias; Vogeley, Kai (2013), “Toward a Second-person Neuroscience”, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 36: 393–462.

Searle, John (1990), “Collective Intentions and Actions”, in Philip R. Cohen, Jerry Morgan, Martha Pollack (eds.), Intentions in Communication, MIT Press, pp. 401–415.

Tuomela, Raimo (2007), The Philosophy of Sociality: The Shared Point of View, New York: Oxford University Press.

Zahavi, Dan (2015), “You, Me and We: The Sharing of Emotional Experience”, Journal of Consciousness Studies 22 (1-2): 84–101.

—. (2021), “We in Me or Me in We? Collective Intentionality and Selfhood”, Journal of Social Ontology 7 (1): 1–20.