From Secession to Submission: an Ethical Framework for Non-territorial Autonomy

Stipe Buzar

doi:10.2298/FID2403691B

Authors

Stipe Buzar Libertas International University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.2298/FID2403691B

Keywords:

ethical framework, moral appropriateness, NTA, secession, states, minorities

Abstract

The purpose of the paper is to ascertain when non-territorial autonomy (NTA) arrangements are a morally appropriate response by states to various minority claims, given possible alternatives. As such, it is not about the relationships between minorities and majorities, but minorities and the state. The two main questions are: (1) What are the criteria of moral appropriateness? (2) When are any of the alternatives morally appropriate? Methodologically speaking, it makes sense to start from the most difficult of the alternatives to justify secession because it represents the most extreme possible claim of a minority towards a state, or even against a state. Once such a criterion or set of criteria is established, the criteria for other alternatives can only be reasonably lower, and the criteria for secession will be indicative of what these lower criteria could be.

References

Beran, Harry. 1984. “A Liberal Theory of Secession.” Political Studies 32 (1): 21–31.

Brilmayer, Lea. 1991. “Secession and Self–Determination: A Territorial Interpretation”, Faculty Scholarship Series. Paper 2434 URL: http://digitalcommons.law.yale. edu/fss_papers/2434 (last accessed: September 15, 2012).

Buchanan, Allen (2021), “Secession”, Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. URL: http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/secession/ (last accessed: November 20, 2023).

Buchanan, Allen. 2004. Justice, Legitimacy and Self–Determination: Moral Foundations for International Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Gaddis, John Lewis. 2018. On Grand Strategy. UK/US: Allen Lane/Penguin Press.

Goemans, Piet. 2023. “Normative Principles and Non-Territorial Autonomy.” In: Andeva, Marina et al., eds. Non-Territorial Autonomy. An Introduction, Palgrave MacMillan, pp.: 85–102. URL: https://entan.org/wp-content/ uploads/2023/05/978-3-031-31609-8.pdf (last accessed: August 4, 2023).

McGee, Robert W. 1994. “Secession Reconsidered.” Journal of Libertarian Studies 11 (1): 11–33. URL: https://cdn.mises.org/11_1_2_0.pdf (last accessed: July 1, 2023).

Miller, David. 1995. On Nationality. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Miller, David. 2003. “Liberalism and Boundaries: A Response to Allen Buchanan.” In: Moore, Margaret and Allen Buchanan, eds. States, Nations, and Borders: The Ethics of Making Boundaries. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp.: 262–272.

Mladić, Damir, Stipe. Buzar. 2015. “Kritika plebiscitarne teorije secesije.” Obnovljeni život 70 (2): 227–242. URL: https://hrcak.srce.hr/146859 (last accessed: October 10, 2023).

Norman, Wayne. 2003. “The Ethics of Secession as the Regulation of Secessionist Politics.” In: Moore, Margaret, ed. National Self–Determination and Secession, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp.: 34–61.

O’Neil, Patrick H. 2010. Essentials of Comparative Politics (3rd ed.). New York, NY: W. W. Norton & Company.

Rosůlek, Přemysl. 2011. “On the Moral Justification of Secession: Critical Remarks to Mainstream Theories.” Europolis. Journal of Political Science and Theory 5 (2): 120–135.

Salat, L. 2023. “The Concept of Non-Territorial Autonomy: Origins, Developments, and Subtypes.” In: Andeva, Marina et al., eds. Non-Territorial Autonomy. An Introduction, Palgrave MacMillan, pp.: 1–26. URL: https://entan.org/wp- content/uploads/2023/05/978-3-031-31609-8.pdf (last accessed: September 1, 2023).

Smith, David J. 2023. “NTA as a Democratization Tool.” In: Andeva, Marina et al., eds. Non-Territorial Autonomy: An Introduction. London: Palgrave MacMillan, pp.: 65–84. URL: https://entan.org/wp-content/

uploads/2023/05/978-3-031-31609-8.pdf (last accessed: September 15, 2023).

Unrepresented Nations & Peoples Organization. 2017. “Self-determination.” URL: https://unpo.org/article/4957 (last accessed: June 1, 2023).

Vizi, Balázs. 2023. “NTA and International Minority Rights.” In: Andeva, Marina et al., eds. Non-Territorial Autonomy: An Introduction. London: Palgrave MacMillan, pp.: 49–66. URL: https://entan.org/wp-content/ uploads/2023/05/978-3-031-31609-8.pdf (last accessed: August 24, 2023).

Wellman, Christopher Heath. 2005. A Theory of Secession: The Case for Political Self–Determination. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.