FROM THE POSTMODERN TO THE METAMODERN: THE HEGELIAN DIALECTICAL PROCESS AND ITS CONTEMPORIZATION ABSTRACT

John David Vandevert

doi:10.2298/FID240228007V

Authors

John David Vandevert Uppsala University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.2298/FID240228007V

Keywords:

metamodernism, postmodernism, Hegel, dialectic, negative dialectic, negation of the negation, metamodern

Abstract

This article posits that postmodernism and its focus on disenchantment, subjective experience(s), and the argument for the incoherency between modernist conceptions of truth, reason, universality, progress, logic, and knowledge are exhausted and have been transcended by a flexible successor. Named “metamodernism,” this new modality addresses the polemics left in the wake of postmodernism like alienation, hyperindividualism, and the breakdown of collectivity and unity. As such, metamodernism represents a more awakened sense of the modernist search for meaning and progress, albeit supplemented with self-conscious awareness of the goal’s seemingly unattainability. However, this renewed interest in reestablishing truth, certainty, assurances of identity, self-realization progress, and reinstatement of usable modes of I/We integrality is hardly new at all. Instead, this burgeoning “metamodern” development represents the rekindling of the “negative dialectic” as previously outlined by G. F. Hegel, but now with a heightened focus on its “positive” development, that is speculative philosophy and the pursuit of sublated individuality-in-unity. In this article, I will explore this argument in four sections. I will outline Hegel’s process of alienation to reunification as elaborated in “The Phenomenology of Spirit,” the “Science of Logic,” and the “Encyclopedia of Logic.” Next, I will explore how postmodernism buckled under its contradictions, introduce the philosophy of “metamodernism,” and argue for a Hegelian reading by focusing on three elements: Ironic Sincerity, Becoming, and Self-Renewal. While only looking at three aspects of a much broader fabric, metamodernism as a cultural shift is not estranged from postmodernism but is instead given life through it.

References

Boucher, Geoff. 2000. “Hegel and Postmodern Discourse Theory.” Paper presented at The Hegel-Marx-Derrida Seminar (Internet). URL: https://www.marxists.org/reference/archive/hegel/txt/gb2000_2.htm (last accessed June 25, 2024).

Boym, Svetlana. 1999. “Nostalgic Memorials and Postmodern Survival in Russia.” In: The Postmodern Challenge: Perspectives East and West. Boston: Brill, pp. 143–170.

Browning, Gary. 2003. “Lyotard and Hegel: what is wrong with modernity and what is right with the philosophy of right.” History of European Ideas 29 (2): 223–239.

Burt, Warren. 2000. Critical Vices: the myths of postmodern theory, Amsterdam: G+B Arts.

Chiereghin, Franco. 2009. “Freedom and Thought: Stoicism, Skepticism, and Unhappy Consciousness.” In: The Blackwell Guide to Hegel’s Phenomenology of Spirit. Westphal: John Wiley & Sons, pp. 55–71.

Clare, Ralph. 2017. “The End of Postmodernism.” In: American Literature in Transition, 1990–2000. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press, pp. 91–104.

Dempsey, Brendan Graham. 2023. Metamodernism Or, The Cultural Logic of Cultural Logics. Baxter: ARC Press.

Eisenstadt, S. N. 1999. “Multiple Modernities in an Age of Globalization.” The Canadian Journal of Sociology 24 (2): 283–295.

Epstein, Mikhail. 1996. After the Future: The Paradoxes of Postmodernism and Contemporary Russian Culture Critical Perspectives On Modern Culture. Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press.

Feyerabend, Paul. 1993. Against Method. New York: Verso.

Forster, Michael. 1993. “Hegel’s Dialectic Method.” In: The Cambridge Companion to Hegel. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 130–170.

Haas, Andrew. 2014. Hegel and the Art of Negation Negativity, Creativity and Contemporary Thought. New York, NY: Bloomsbury.

Hegel, Georg W. F. 2010. The Science of Logic. Translated by George di Giovanni. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

______. 2018. The Phenomenology of Spirit. Translated by Terry Pinkard. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

______. 1959. The Logic of Hegel. Translated by William Wallace. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Heidemann, Dietmar. 2011. “Hegel on the Nature of Scepticism.” Hegel Bulletin 32 (1-2): 80–99.

Ivanova, Natalya. 1998. “Overcoming postmodernism.” Znamya, 4.

Jameson, Frederic. 1991. Postmodernism, Or the Cultural Logic of Late Capitalism. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

Kain, Philip J. 2007. “Nietzsche, Eternal Recurrence, and the Horror of Existence.” The Journal of Nietzsche Studies 33 (Spring): 49–63.

Krahn, Ryan. 2014. “The Sublation of Dialectics: Hegel and the Logic of Aufhebung.” PhD dissertation, The University of Guelph.

Khrushcheva, Natalia. 2019. “Post-irony and euphoria: about metamodernity in academic music.” Musical Academia 765 (1).

Kirby, Alan. 2006. “The Death of Postmodernism And Beyond.” Philosophy Now, 58.

Kristeva, Julia. 1984. Revolution in Poetic Language. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.

Lai, Jemmenez. 2019. “Between Irony And Sincerity.” Log 46 (Summer): 23–32.

Lipovetsky, Mark. 1999. “The Paralogy of Russian Postmodernism.” Russian Studies in Literature 35 (2): 59–82.

Luther, Timothy. 2009. Hegel’s Critique of Modernity: Reconciling Individual Freedom and the Community. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.

Lyotard, Jean-Francois. 1984. The Postmodern Condition: A Report on Knowledge. Translated by Geoff Bennington and Brian Massumi. Manchester: Manchester University Press.

Malabou, Catherine. 2005. The Future of Hegel: Plasticity, Temporality and Dialectic. Oxford: Routledge.

Mainländer, Philipp. 1876. Die Philosophie der Erlösung. Berlin: Verlag von Theobald Grieben.

McFarlane, Thomas J. 2004. “Plato’s Parmenides.” (Internet). URL: http://www.integralscience.org/platoparmenides.html (last accessed February 25, 2024).

Morawski, Stefan. 1996. The Troubles with Postmodernism. London: Routledge,

Morrison, Simon. 2019. Russian Opera and the Symbolist Movement, Second Edition. Berkeley, University of California Press.

Pipere, Anita and Kristine Mārtinsone. 2022. “Metamodernism and Social Sciences: Scoping the Future.” Social Sciences 11(10): 457.

Retsova, K. M. 2022. “To replace postmodernity: a review of new concepts of the state of culture and society.” NOMOTHETIKA: Philosophy. Sociology. Right 47 (3): 474–482.

Rose, David Edward. 2019. “Sartre’s Hegelianism: A Culturally Appropriate Form of Radical Rebellion.” The Philosophical Journal of Conflict and Violence 3 (2): 149–167.

Rutzou, Timothy. 2015. “In Pursuit of the Real: Postmodernism and Critical Realism.” PhD dissertation, Department of Philosophy, University College London.

Sarlemijn, Andries. 1975. Hegel’s Dialectic. Dordrecht: D. Reidel Publishing.

Sim, Stuart, ed. 2011. The Routledge Companion to Postmodernism. Abington: Routledge.

Singh, Raghwendra Pratap. 1995. “Hegelianism: Postmodernist’ Charges Refused.” Indian Philosophical Quarterly 22 (2): 95–104.

Sonderling, Stefan. 2022. “To speak is to fight: war as structure of thought in Lyotard’s postmodern condition.” Communicare 32 (2): 1–19.

Stirling, James H. 1898. The Secret of Hegel: Being the Hegelian System in Origin, Principle, Form and Matter, 2nd ed. London: Simpkin & Marshall.

Storm, Jason. 2021. Metamodernism: The Future of Theory. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.

Trilling, James. 1996. “A Modernist’s Critique of Postmodernism.” International Journal of Politics, Culture and Society 9 (3), pp. 353–371.

Zavarzadeh, Mas’ud. 1975. “The Apocalyptic Fact and the Eclipse of Fiction in Recent American Prose Narratives.” Journal of American Studies 9 (1), pp. 69–83.

Zizek, Slavoj. 1991. “Why Should a Dialectician Learn to Count to Four?” Radical Philosophy 58 (Summer), pp. 3–9.

______. 2011. Less Than Nothing Hegel And The Shadow Of Dialectical Materialism. London: Verso.

Zizek, Slavoj et. al. 2011. Hegel and the Infinite: Religion, Politics, and Dialectic. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.