The Absence of Sexual Difference in the Theology of Maximus the Confessor

Emma Brown Dewhurst

doi:10.2298/FID2102204B

Authors

Emma Brown Dewhurst Evangelisch-Theologische Fakultät, Ludwig Maximilians Universität München

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.2298/FID2102204B

Keywords:

Ambiguum 41, body, Byzantine theology, Byzantine philosophy, eschatology, gender, Maximus the Confessor, protology, sex

Abstract

There has been much attention devoted in the last decade and especially in the last few years to Maximus the Confessor’s beliefs concerning sexual difference and its removal. The most important text on this topic is Ambiguum 41. There has been mixed reception of this text, with some scholars advocating that Maximus believes that sexual difference was absent from original human nature and will return to such a state in the eschaton; and other scholars believing that this should be read as a metaphorical absence. This article re-evaluates the text in question and argues that the former position should be maintained. It goes some way to bring together current scholarship on the text and to answers questions that arise from the opposing reading.

References

Primary Sources:

Gregory of Nyssa (1863), De Hominis Opficio, in J. P. Migne, Patrologiae Graecae, vol. 44, Paris: Garnier fratres, pp. 123–257.

—. (2014), De Anima et Resurrectione, in Andreas Spira (ed.), Gregorii Nysseni Opera, vol. 3, pars 3, Leiden: Brill.

Maximus the Confessor (1865a), Capita theologica et oeconomica (=Cap. Theol), in J. P. Migne, Patrologia Graeca, vol. 90, Paris: Garnier fratres, 1083–1174.

—. (1865b), Centuriae de charitate, in J. P. Migne, Patrologia Graeca, vol. 90, Paris: 959–1080.

—. (1931), Mystagogia (=Myst.), in Raffaele Cantarella (ed.), Massimo Confessore. La mistagogia ed altri scriti, Florence: Testi Cristiani.

—. (1980), Quaestiones ad Thalassium I: Quaestiones I-LV (=Q.Thal), Carl Laga & Carlos Steel (eds.), Corpus Cristianorum Series Graeca 7, Turhout: Brepols.

—. (1990), Quaestiones ad Thalassium II: Quaestiones LVI-LXV (=Q.Thal), Carl Laga & Carlos Steel (eds.), Corpus Cristianorum Series Graeca 22, Turhout: Brepols.

—. (1982), Quaestiones et Dubia (=Q.Dub), in J. H. Declerck (ed.), Maximi confessoris quaestiones et Dubia. Corpus Christianorum. Series Graeca, vol. 10, Turnhout: Brepols.

—. (2014a), Ambigua 1–22 (=Amb.), in Nicholas Constas, On Difficulties in the Church Fathers: The Ambigua, vol. 1, Dumbarton Oaks Medieval Library 29, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

—. (2014b), Ambigua 23–71 (=Amb.), in Nicholas Constas (ed. and transl.), On Difficulties in the Church Fathers: The Ambigua, vol. 2, Dumbarton Oaks Medieval Library 29, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Secondary Sources:

Blowers, Paul (2016), Maximus the Confessor: Jesus Christ and the Transfiguration of the World, Oxford: OUP.

Bradshaw, David (2013), “The Logoi of Beings in Greek Patristic Thought”, in John Chryssavgis, Bruce V. Foltz (eds.), Toward an Ecology of Transfiguration: Orthodox Christian Perspectives on Environment, Nature and Creation, Fordham: Fordham University Press, pp. 9–22.

Brown Dewhurst, E. (2020), “On the Soul and the Cyberpunk Future: St Macrina, St Gregory of Nyssa and Contemporary Mind/Body Dualism”, Studies in Christian Ethics 33 (4): 443–462.

Cadenhead, Raphael A. (2018), The Body and Desire: Gregory of Nyssa’s Ascetical Theology, Oakland, CA: University of California Press.

Costache, Doru (2013), “Living above Gender: Insights from Maximus the Confessor”, Journal of Early Christian Studies 21 (2): 261–290.

Cooper, Adam (2005), The Body in St Maximus the Confessor: Holy Flesh, Wholly Deified, Oxford: OUP.

—. (2013), “Saint Maximus on the mystery of Marriage and the Body: a Reconsideration”, in Maxim Vasiljević (ed.), Knowing the Purpose of Creation Through the Resurrection, Belgrade: Sebastian Press, pp. 195–221.

Cvetković, Vladimir (2016), “Maximus the Confessor’s Geometrical Analogies Applied to the Relationship between Christ and Creation”, in George Dion Dragas, Pavel Pavlov, Stoyan Tanev (eds.), Orthodox Theology and the Sciences, Sofia: Sofia University Press, Columbia MO: New Rome Press, pp. 277–291.

Kochańczyk-Bonińska, Karolina (2017), “Chapter 14: The Philosophical Basis of Maximus’ Concept of Sexes: The Reasons and Purposes of the Distinction between Man and Woman”, in Sotiris Mitralexis, Georgios Steiris, Marcin Podbielski, Sebastian Lalla (eds.), Maximus the Confessor as a European Philosopher, Oregon: Cascade Books, pp. 229–238.

Loudovikos, Nikolaos (2010), A Eucharistic Ontology: Maximus the Confessor’s Eschatological Ontology of Being as Dialogical Reciprocity, Elizabeth Theokritoff (transl.), Massachusetts: Holy Cross Orthodox Press.

Louth, Andrew (2010), “St Maximos’ Doctrine of the logoi of Creation”, in Studia Patristica, vol. 48, Leuven: Peeters Publishers, pp. 77–84.

Mitralexis, Sotiris (2017), “Rethinking the Problem of Sexual Difference in Ambiguum 41”, Analogia 2 (1): 139–144.

Partridge, Cameron Elliot (2008), Transfiguring Sexual Difference in Maximus the Confessor, PhD diss., Harvard Divinity School.

Skliris, Dionysios (2017), “The Ontology of Mode in the Thought of Maximus the Confessor and its Consequences for a Theory of Gender”, in Sotiris Mitralexis (ed.), Mustard Seeds in the Public Square: Between and Beyond Theology, Philosophy, and Society, Delaware: Vernon Press, pp. 39–60.

Thunberg, Lars (1965), Microcosm and Mediator, Copenhagen: C.W.K. Gleerup Lund.

Tollefsen, Torstein T. (2015), “The Concept of the Universal in the Philosophy of St Maximus”, in Antoine Levy, Pauli Annala, Olli Hallamaa, Tuomo Lankila (eds.), The Architecture of the Cosmos. St. Maximus the Confessor. New Perspectives, Helsinki: Luther-Agricola-Society, pp. 70–92.

Törönen, Melchisedec (2007), Union and Distinction in the Thought of St Maximus the Confessor, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

von Balthasar, Hans Urs (1941), Kosmische Liturgie: Maximus der Bekenner, Freiburg i. B.: Herder.