Are Musical Works Sound Structures?
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.2298/FID1901036GKeywords:
musical ontology, Platonism, nominalism, artworks, typesAbstract
This paper is about the dilemma raised against musical ontology by Roger Scruton, in his The Aesthetics of Music: either musical ontology is about certain mind-independent “things” (sound structures) and so music is left out of the picture, or it is about an “intentional object” and so its puzzles are susceptible of an arbitrary answer. I argue the dilemma is merely apparent and deny that musical works can be identified with sound structures, whether or not conceived as abstract entities. The general idea is this: both Platonism and nominalism about musical works are a kind of fetishism: musical works are not “things”, in Danto’s sense of “mere real things”; they rather involve complex relationships between objects, events, and different kinds of functional properties. For this, I draw on Levinson and Howell’s notion of indication, combined with Searle’s approach to institutional reality... with a little twist of my own.
References
Borges, Jorge Luis (1999), Collected Fictions, Andrew Hurley (trans.), London: Penguin Books.
Currie, Gregory (1989,) An Ontology of Art, Glasgow: Scots Philosophical Club.
Currie, Gregory (2009) “Art for Art’s Sake in the Old Stone Age”, Postgraduate Journal of Aesthetics 6(1).
Danto, Arthur (1964) “The Artworld”, The Journal of Philosophy 61(19): 571–584.
Danto, Arthur (1981), The Transfiguration of the Commonplace, Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Davies, David (2004), Art as Performance, Hoboken: Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
Dilworth, John, “How to Reform Danto’s Vehicle Fetishism”, (internet) available at: https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/ce53/a21519888d4475a75dc71bbc04a2b30ad611.pdf
Dodd, Julian (2007), Works of Music: An Essay in Ontology, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Howell, Robert (2002) “Types, Indicated and Initiated”, British Journal of Aesthetics 42(2): 105–127.
Joyce, James (2012), Finnegans Wake, Oxford: Oxford World Classics.
Kania, Andrew (2008), “New Waves in Musical Ontology”, in Kathleen Stock and Katherine Thomson-Jones (eds.), New Waves in Aesthetics, New York: Springer, pp. 20–40.
Levinson, Jerrold (1980) “What a Musical Work Is”, Journal of Philosophy 77(1) 5–28.
Levinson, Jerrold (2011), “What a Musical Work Is, Again”, in Jerrold Levinson (ed.) Music, Art and Metaphysics, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 215–263.
Levinson, Jerrold (2013), “Indication, Abstraction and Individuation”, in Mag Uidhir (ed.), Art and Abstract Objects, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 49–61.
Magnus, P. D. (2013), “Historical Individuals like Anas platyrhynchos and ‘Classical Gas’”, in Mag Uidhir (ed.), Art and Abstract Objects, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 108–124.
Margolis, Joseph (1974), “Works of Art as Physically Embodied and Culturally Emergent Entities”, British Journal of Aesthetics 14 (3) 187–196.
Rohrbaugh, Guy (2003), “Artworks as Historical Individuals”, European Journal of Philosophy, 11(2): 177–205.
Scruton, Roger (1997), The Aesthetics of Music. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Searle, John (1995), The Construction of Social Reality, New York: Simon and Schuster.
Searle, John (2010), Making the Social World, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Small, Christopher (1998), Musicking, The Meanings of Performing and Listening. Middletown; Wesleyan University Press.
Stone, Jim (1994) “Games and Family Resemblances”, Philosophical Investigations 17(2): 435– 443.
Thomasson, Amie (1999), Fiction and Metaphysics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Walton, Kendall (1970), “Categories of Art”, Philosophical Review 79(3): 334–367.
Young, James O. (2011), “The Ontology of Musical Works: A Philosophical Pseudo-Problem”, Frontiers of Philosophy in China 6(2): 284–297.
Young, James O (2014), “The Poverty of Musical Ontology”, Journal of Music and Meaning 13: 1–19.
Zangwill, Nick (2014), “Metaphor as Appropriation”, Philosophy and Literature 38(1): 142–152.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Articles published in Philosophy and Society are open-access in accordance with the CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 License.
