Suicide, euthanasia and the duty to die: A Kantian approach to euthanasia

Marina Budić

doi:10.2298/FID1801088B

Authors

Marina Budić PhD Candidate, Faculty of Philosophy, University of Belgrade;

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.2298/FID1801088B

Keywords:

Kant, euthanasia, rationality, honor, dignity, autonomy, dementia

Abstract

The paper addresses the issues of euthanasia and thoroughly analyses Kantian response to the practice in question. In reference to Kant’s views on many related issues, such as murder, suicide, autonomy, rationality, honor and the value of human life, the main goal of this paper is to offer an explanation for one probable Kantian view on euthanasia in general, as well as an explanation for a specific form of euthanasia with regard to those patients suffering from dementia. The author’s arguments, according to which Kant could even argue that those persons who have begun suffering from dementia have a duty to die, have all been given special importance in this paper. The question is could and should this specific moral ever be allowed to become universal when considering the patients’ willingness to commit suicide once they start suffering from dementia or perhaps once they start experiencing a loss of rationality? Should suicide even become a patient’s duty? Furthermore, if a patient shows absolutely no intention or willingness of taking her/his own life, ‘should’ the doctor perform a non-voluntary euthanasia over the patient? This paper analyses the author’s arguments which are actually in favor of aforementioned questions, and aims to examine the plausibility of the act as well as to criticize it. The issue of euthanasia is very important, because the key question is what in fact constitutes the fundamental value of human life, which lies at the heart of this problem.

References

Babić, Jovan (1991), „Kategorički imperativ i univerzalizacija“, Filozofske studije 23: 3–76. Beckler, Joshua (2012), “Kantian Ethics: A Support for Euthanasia with Extreme Dementia“, Bioethics and Medical Ethics Commons 12 (1): 1–6.
Bedau, Hugo Adam and Kelly, Erin, “Punishment”, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2015 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.), (internet) available at: http://plato.stanford. edu/archives/fall2015/entries/punishment/
Brassington Iain (2006), “Killing people: what Kant could have said about suicide and euthanasia but did not”, Journal of Medical Ethics 32 (10): 571–574.
Cholbi, Michael (2014), “Kant on euthanasia and the duty to die: clearing the air”, Journal of Medical Ethics 41 (8): 1–4.
Cooley. Dennis (2007), “A Kantian Moral Duty for the Soon-to-be Demented to Commit Suicide”, AJOB 7 (6): 37–44.
Đerić, Milijana (2013), „Eutanazija: konceptualizacija problema i bitnih distinkcija“, Filozofija i društvo 24 (2): 255–263.
Hui, C. E., Gibbard, W. B. (1993), “ ‘Thou Shalt Not Kill’: A Case against Active Euthanasia”, Humane Med. 9 (3): 207–15.
Johnson, Robert, “Kant’s Moral Philosophy”, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2014 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.), (internet) available at: http://plato. stanford.edu/archives/sum2014/entries/kant-moral/
Jones, David A. (2011), “Is There a Logical Slippery Slope from Voluntary to Nonvoluntary Euthanasia?”, Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 21 (4): 379–404.
Kant, Immanuel (1997), Lectures on ethics, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.
Kant, Imanuel (2008), Zasnivanje metafizike morala. Beograd: Dereta.
—. (1993), Metafizika morala, Novi Sad: Izdavačka knjižarnica Zorana Stojanovića.
Pens, Gregori E. (2007), Klasični slučajevi iz medicinske etike, Beograd: Službeni glasnik.
Primorac, Igor (1978), Prestup i kazna: Rasprave o moralnosti kazne, Beograd: NIP „Mladost“.
Rauscher, Frederick (2012), “Kant’s Social and Political Philosophy”, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2012 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.), (internet) available at: http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2012/entries/kant-social-political/
Rhodes, Rosamond (2007), “A Kantian Duty to Commit Suicide and Its Implications for Bioethics”, The American Journal of Bioethics 7 (6): 45–47.
Rejčels, Džejms (2012), „Pasivna i aktivna eutanazija“, u V. Rakić, I. Mladenović i R. Drezgić (prir.) Bioetika, Beograd: Službeni glasnik: str. 583–589.
Rohlf, Michael, “Immanuel Kant”, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2014 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.), (internet) available at: http://plato.stanford.edu/ archives/sum2014/entries/kant/
Sharp, Robert (2012), “The dangers of euthanasia and dementia: how Kantian thinking might be used to support non-voluntary euthanasia in cases of extreme dementia”, Bioethics 26 (5): 231– 235.
Singer, Piter (2003), Praktična etika, Zagreb: KruZak.
Sjöstrand, M., Helgesson, G., Eriksson, S., Juth, N. (2013), “Autonomy-based arguments against physician-assisted suicide and euthanasia: a critique”, Med Health Care and Philos 16: 225–230.
Turković, K., Roksandić S., Vidlička, A. Maršavelski (2010), „Eutanazija i potpomognuto samoubojstvo“, Hrvatski ljetopis za kazneno pravo i praksu 17 (1): 223–246.
Yost, Benjamin S. (2010), “Kant’s Justification of the Death Penalty Reconsidered”, Kantian Review 15:1–27.
Young, Robert (2015), “Voluntary Euthanasia”, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2015 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.), URL = http://plato.stanford.edu/ archives/spr2015/entries/euthanasia-voluntary/