Transcendental philosophy within perspectives of the romantic fragmentariness

pages: 69-87

Authors

  • Stanko Vlaški Faculty of Philosophy, University of Novi Sad

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.2298/FID1501069V

Abstract

The relation of Jena romantics to Kant’s transcendental philosophy could be considered from the point of view of the romantic theory of the fragment. The author claims that fragmentariness had a transcendental character in the philosophical ref lections of Friedrich Schlegel and Novalis. That is the reason that they have acquired the opportunity of approaching to the immanent tension of Kant’s philosophical project. The problem of ref lection of relation between systematicity and incompleteness of knowledge and of man’s theoretical and practical side is among the most important. The author tries to evaluate the importance of Fichte’s version of critical idealism for romantics, considering the crucial romanticists’ intention of historization of transcendental idealism with the help of the fragment. Final chapter refers to recent interpretations of the romantic fragment which tend to ignore this intention. Keywords: Schlegel, Novalis, Kant, Fichte, fragment, fragmentariness, dialectic, transcendentality, history

References

Behler, Ernst (1993), German Romantic Literary Theory, Cambridge. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Beiser, Frederick C. (2002), German Idealism: The Struggle against Subjectivism 1781–1801, Cambridge, London: Harward University Press.
Beiser, Frederick C. (2003), The Romantic Imperative. The Concept of Early German Romanticism, Cambridge, London: Harward University Press.
Berlin, Isaija (2012), Koreni romantizma, Beograd: Službeni glasnik (prevod B. Gligorić).
Bernstein, Jay M. (2006), „Poesy and the Arbitrariness of the Sign. Notes for a critique of Jena Romanticism“, u N. Kompridis, Philosophical Romanticism, London, New York: Routledge, str. 143–172.
Blanchot, Maurice (1983), „The Athenaeum“, u Studies in Romanticism 22 (2): 163–172.
Blanšo, Moris (2004), „Niče i fragmentarno pismo“, u Gradac – Časopis za književnost, umetnost i kulturu 152–153: 183–198 (prevod: I. Velimirac).
Bowie, Andrew (2003), Aesthetics and subjectivity: from Kant to Nietzsche, Manchester: Manchester University Press.
Bubner, Rüdiger (2003), The Innovations of Idealism, Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press.
Diltaj, Vilhelm (1980), Izgradnja istorijskog sveta u duhovnim naukama, Beograd: BIGZ (prevod: D. Guteša).
Dilthey, Wilhelm (1996), „Schleiermacher’s Hermeneutical System in Relation to Earlier Protestant Hermeneutics“, u Hermeneutics and the Study of History, Selected Works, Vol. IV, New Jersey: Princeton University Press,
str. 33–227.
Dimić, Zoran (2014), „Filozofija kao učenje“, u D. Basta (prir.), Fihteov idealizam slobode. Dva veka od smrti Johana Gotliba Fihtea (1814–2014), Beograd: Dosije Studio, str. 33–57.
Fichte, J. G. (1974), Osnova cjelokupne nauke o znanosti, Zagreb: Naprijed (prevod: V. D. Zonenfeld).
Fihte, J. G. (1976), Učenje o nauci, Beograd: BIGZ (izbor i prevod: D. Basta).
Fihte, J. G. (1979), Zatvorena trgovačka država; Pet predavanja o određenju naučnika, Beograd: Nolit (prevod: D. Basta).
Frank, Manfred (1989), Einführung in die frühromantische Ästhetik, Frankfurt a. M.: Suhrkamp.
Gasche, Rodolphe (1991), „Ideality in Fragmentation“, u F. Schlegel (1991), Philosophical Fragments, Minneapolis, London: University of Minnesota Press, str. vii–xxxii.
Gronden, Žan (2010), Uvod u filozofsku hermeneutiku, Novi Sad: Akademska knjiga (prevod: E. Peruničić).
Hegel, G. V. F. (1983), Istorija filozofije III, Beograd: BIGZ (prevod: N. M. Popović).
Horne, H (1997), „The Early Romantic Fragment and Incompleteness“, u J. Schulte-Sasse (ed.), Theory as Practice – A Critical Anthology of Early German Romantic Writings, Mineapolis, London: University of Minnesota
Press, str. 289–313.
Kangrga, Milan (2010), Spekulacija i filozofija od Fichtea do Marxa, Beograd: Službeni glasnik.
Kant, Immanuel (1979), The Conflict of the Faculties/Der Streit der Fakultaeten (bilingual edition), New York: Abaris Books.
Kant, Imanuel (1990), Religija unutar granica čistog uma, Beograd: BIGZ (prevod: A. Buha).
Kant, Imanuel (2003), Kritika čistoga uma, Beograd: Dereta (prevod: N. Popović).
Kant, Imanuel (2004), Kritika moći suđenja, Beograd: Dereta (prevod: N. Popović).
Kant, Imanuel (2005), Prolegomena za svaku buduću metafiziku, Beograd: Plato (prevod: B. Zec).
Kneller, Jane (2007), Kant and the Power of Imagination, Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press.
Man, Pol de (1975), Problemi moderne kritike, Beograd: Nolit (prevod: G. B.Todorović i B. Jelić).
Millan-Zaibert, Elizabeth (2007), Friedrich Schlegel and the Emergence of Romantic Philosophy, Albany: State University of New York Press.
Niče, Fridrih (2003), Volja za moć, Beograd: Dereta (prevod: D. Stojanović).
Novalis (2010), Izabrana dela, Beograd: Nolit (preveo i prepevao: B. Živojinović).
Novalis (1968), Schriften. Dritter Band (Das philosophische Werk II), Stuttgart: W. Kohlhammer.
Novalis (2001), „Kant Studies (1797)“, The Philosophical Forum 32 (4): 323–338.
Pinkard, Terry (2002), German Philosophy 1760–1860: The Legacy of Idealism, Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press.
Prole, Dragan (2013), Unutrašnje inostranstvo. Filozofska refleksija romantizma, Sremski Karlovci, Novi Sad: Izdavačka knjižarnica Zorana Stojanovića.
Rajan, Tilottama i Arkady Plotnitsky (ed.) (2004), Idealism without Absolutes: Philosophy and the Romantic Culture, Albany: State University of New York Press.
Schlegel, Friedrich (1997), „Introduction to the Transcendental Philosophy (1800)“, u J. Schulte-Sasse (ed.), Theory as Practice – A Critical Anthology of Early German Romantic Writings, Mineapolis, London: University of
Minnesota Press, str. 240–267.
Schlegel, Friedrich (2006), Kritike i fragmenti, Zagreb: Naklada Jurčić.
Šlegel, Fridrih (1999), Ironija ljubavi (Izbor iz dela), Beograd: Zepter Book World (preveo: D. Stojanović).
Zafranski, Ridiger (2011), Romantizam – jedna nemačka afera, Novi Sad: Adresa (prevod: M. Avramović).
Zovko, Jure (1997), Schlegelova hermeneutika, Zagreb: Globus (prevod: Ž. Pavić).

Published

14.01.2015

How to Cite

Vlaški, S. (2015) “Transcendental philosophy within perspectives of the romantic fragmentariness: pages: 69-87”, Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society. Belgrade, Serbia, 26(1). doi: 10.2298/FID1501069V.

Issue

Section

KANT AND ROMANTICISM