After Hegel: A Postmodern Genealogy of Historical Fiction

Authors

  • Angelo Narváez León Universidad Católica Silva Henríquez
  • Fernanda Medina Badilla Universidad Adolfo Ibáñez

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.2298/FID2402299N

Keywords:

Kant, Hegel , Groys, modernity, postmodernity, history, language

Abstract

In this article, we analyze a possible form of the relationship between modernity and postmodernity by examining the transformation of the place of enunciation of criticism as a philosophical narrative and using it as a historical and philosophical criterion. To achieve this, we first focus on key moments in the critical discourse of modernity, and then analyze the role of Kantian criticism in the formation of a postmodern imaginary associated with the notions of useful fiction and linguistification. Finally, from a Hegelian perspective, we consider the validity of the idea of universal history and its connections to emancipatory narratives. 

References

Adorno, Theodor. 2004. Negative Dialectics. New York, NY: Routledge. Badiou, Alain. 2010. The Communist Hypothesis. London: Verso.

Buck-Morss, Susan. 2009. Hegel, Haiti, and Universal History. Pittsburgh, PA: Pittsburgh University Press.

Deleuze, Gilles, and Félix Guattari. 1994. What is Philosophy? New York, NY: Columbia University Press.

Göschel, Karl. 1832. Hegel und Seine Zeit: Mit Rücksicht auf Goethe. Zum Unterrichte in der gegenwärtigen Philosophie nach ihren Verhältnissen zur Zeit und nach ihren wesentlichen Grundzügen. Berlin: Duncker u. Humblot.

Groys, Boris. 2009. The Communist Postscript. London: Verso.

Engels, Friedrich. 1976. Ludwig Feuerbach and the Outcome of Classic German Philosophy. New York, NY: International Publishers.

Feuerbach, Ludwig. 1986. Principles of the Philosophy of the Future. Cambridge: Hackett Publishing Company.

. 1989. The Essence of Christianity. New York, NY: Prometheus Books.

Foucault, Michel. 1980. Language, Counter-Memory, Practice: Selected Essays and Interviews. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

Haym, Rudolf. 1962. Hegel und seine Zeit. Hildesheim: Georg Olms Verlagsbuchhanflung.

Hegel, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich. 1979. Phenomenology of Spirit. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

. 1998. Lectures on the History of Philosophy. Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.

. 2008. Outlines of the Philosophy of Right. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

. 2010. The Science of Logic. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Heine, Heinrich. 2007. On the History of Religion and Philosophy in Germany. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Hess, Moses. 1964. “The Philosophy of Act.” In: Albert Fried, ed. Socialist Thought: A Documentary History. Chicago, IL: Aldine Publishing Company.

Kant, Immanuel. 1998. Critique of Pure Reason. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

. 2006. Towards Perpetual Peace. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

Lonzi, Carla. 1974. Sputiamo su Hegel. La donna clitoridea e la donna vaginale, e altri scritti. Milano: Rivolta Femminile.

Marx, Karl and Friedrich Engels. 1956. The Holy Family, or the Critique of Critical Critique. Moscow: Progress.

. 1976. The German Ideology. Moscow: Progress.

Postone, Moishe. 1996. Time, Labor, and Social Domination: A Reinterpretation of Marx’s Critical Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Schelling, Friedrich. 1998. On the History of Modern Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Scholz, Heinrich. 1921. Die Bedeutung der Hegelschen Philosophie für das philosophische Denken der Gegenwart. Berlin: Reuther.

Vaihinger, Hans. 1935. The Philosophy of ‘As if‘: A System of the Theoretical, Practical and Religious Fictions of Mankind. London: Kegan Paul, Trench, Trubner & Co.

Žižek, Slavoj. 2006. The Parallax View. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

. 2008. For They Know Not What They Do: Enjoyment as a Political Factor. London: Verso.

. 2013. Less than Nothing: Hegel and the Shadows of Dialectical Materialism. London: Verso.

Published

30.06.2024

How to Cite

Narváez León, A. and Medina Badilla, F. . (2024) “After Hegel: A Postmodern Genealogy of Historical Fiction”, Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society. Belgrade, Serbia, 35(2), pp. 299–316. doi: 10.2298/FID2402299N.