A New Climate for Human Nature? Navigating Social Theory through Postnature, the Anthropocene and Posthumanism

Stefan Janković

doi:10.2298/FID2401053J

Authors

Stefan Janković University of Belgrade, Faculty of Philosophy, Department of Sociology

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.2298/FID2401053J

Keywords:

Anthropocene, postnature, human nature, posthumanism, planet

Abstract

By examining debates on the Anthropocene era ignited by new materialist and posthumanist scholarship, this paper aims to discern how these perspectives can reframe the human-nature nexus. It also considers how various “developmentalist” approaches might assume the role traditionally held by the concept of human nature. The first section highlights concerns raised by posthumanist and neomaterialist scholars about the marginalized status of “nature”, life, and biology within dominant constructivist viewpoints. A central argument posits that notions like “denaturalization” and biopolitics amplify societal dominance over nature, pushing social theory towards an anthropocentric and potentially biologically indeterminate stance. Contrasting this, the second section delves into modern interpretations of the planet in social theory, inspired by the emergence of the Anthropocene. This lens reveals a dynamic, co-constitutive relationship, tilting less towards the unilateral commands of “nature” and more towards understanding the evolution of human life and societal structures within Earth’s expansive temporal and spatial realms. The third section further unpacks these developmental ideas by juxtaposing the theories of Bruno Latour and Tim Ingold. The paper contends that both approaches endeavor to illuminate the complex processes underpinning the evolution of life forms, underscoring the significance of culture. In conclusion, the intricate postnatural landscape of the Anthropocene necessitates a more integrated human-nature relationship. This calls for not only discarding dehumanizing facets of human nature, but also fostering a renewed sensibility – a deeper form of humanizing that acknowledges and celebrates our shared existence with other species and entities.

References

Abbott, Andrew. 2016. Processual Sociology. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

Alaimo, Stacy. 2010. Bodily Natures: Science, Environment, and the Material Self. Indianapolis, IN: Indiana University Press.

Alaimo, Stacy. 2016. “Nature.” In: Disch, Lisa, and Mary Hawkesworth, eds. The Oxford Handbook on Feminist Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp.: 530–550.

Anker, Elizabeth, and Rita Felski. 2017. “Introduction.” In: Anker, Elizabeth, and Rita Felski, eds. Critique and Postcritique. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, pp.: 1–29.

Arènes, Alexandra, Bruno Latour, and Jerome Gaillardet. 2018. “Giving Depth to the Surface: An Exercise in the Gaia-graphy of Critical Zones.” The Anthropocene Review 5 (2): 120–135.

Åsberg, Cecilia, and Rosi Braidotti. 2018. “Feminist Posthumanities: An Introduction.” In: Åsberg, Cecilia, and Rosi Braidotti, eds. A Feminist Companion to the Posthumanities. Cham: Springer, pp.: 1–22.

Asher, Kiran, and Joel Wainwright. 2018. “After Post-Development: On Capitalism, Difference, and Representation.” Antipode 51 (1): 25–44.

Baldwin, Andrew. 2017. “Climate Change, Migration, and the Crisis of Humanism.” WIREs Climate Change 8: e460. doi:10.1002/wcc.460.

Barad, Karen. 2018. “Posthumanist Performativity: Toward an Understanding of How Matter Comes to Matter.” In: Åsberg, Cecilia, and Rosi Braidotti, eds. A Feminist Companion to the Posthumanities. Cham: Springer, pp.: 1–22.

Barry, Andrew, and Mark Maslin. 2016. “The Politics of the Anthropocene: A Dialogue.” Geo: Geography and Environment 3 (2): 1–12.

Beck, Ulrich. 1992. Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity. London: Sage.

Bennet, Jane. 2010. Vibrant Matter: A Political Ecology of Things. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

Bennet, Tony et al. 2009. Culture, Class, Distinction. London: Routledge. Bettini, Giovanni. 2017. “Where Next? Climate Change, Migration, and the (Bio)politics of Adaptation.” Global Policy 8 (1): 33–39.

Blaser, Mario, and Marisol de la Cadena. 2018. “Introduction: Pluriverse Proposals for a World of Many Worlds.” In: Blaser, Mario, and Marisol de la Cadena, eds. A World of Many Worlds. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, pp.: 1–22.

Blok, Anders, and Casper Bruun Jensen. 2019. “The Anthropocene Event in Social Theory: On Ways of Problematizing Nonhuman Materiality Differently.” The Sociological Review 67 (6): 1195–1211.

Boscov-Ellen, Dan. 2020. “Whose Universalism? Dipesh Chakrabarty and the Anthropocene.” Capitalism Nature Socialism 31 (1): 70–83.

Bould, Mark. 2021. The Anthropocene Unconscious: Climate Catastrophe Culture. London: Verso.

Bourdieu, Pierre. 1990. In Other Words: Essays Toward a Reflective Sociology. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

–. 1992. The Logic of Practice. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

–. 2000. Pascalian Meditations. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press. Braidotti, Rosi. 2013. “Posthuman Humanities.” European Educational Research Journal 12 (1): 1–19.

–. 2016. “Posthuman Feminist Theory.” In: Disch, Lisa, and Mary Hawkesworth, eds. The Oxford Handbook of Feminist Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp.: 673–698.

–. 2017a. “Critical Posthuman Knowledges.” South Atlantic Quarterly 116 (1): 83–96.

–. 2017b. “Four Theses on Posthuman Feminism.” In: Grusin, Richard, ed. Anthropocene Feminism. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press, pp.: 21–48.

–. 2021. Posthuman Feminism. Cambridge: Polity Press.

Brenner, Neil, and Nikos Katsikis. 2020. “Operational Landscapes: Hinterlands of the Capitalocene.” Architectural Design / AD 90 (1): 22–31.

Bryant, Levi. 2014. Onto-Cartography: An Ontology of Machines and Media. Edinburgh: University of Edinburgh Press.

Büscher, Monika, Mimi Sheller, and David Tyfield. 2016. “Mobility Intersections: Social Research, Social Futures.” Mobilities 11 (4): 485–497.

Callon, Michel. 1987. “Society in the Making: the Study of Technology as a Tool for Sociological Analysis.” In: Bijker, Wiebe, Thomas Hughes, and Trevor Pinch, eds. The Social Construction of Technological Systems: New Directions in the Sociology and History of Technology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp.: 83–103.

Chakrabarty, Dipesh. 2009. “The Climate of History: Four Theses.” Critical Inquiry 35 (2): 197–222.

–. 2014. “Climate and Capital: On Conjoined Histories.” Critical Inquiry 41(1): 1–23.

–. 2015. “The Human Condition in the Anthropocene.” The Tanner Lectures in Human Values, delivered at Yale University, February 18-19, 2015: 139–188.

–. 2016. “Humanities in the Anthropocene: The Crisis of an Enduring Kantian Fable.” New Literary History 47 (2-3): 377–397.

–. 2017a. “The Future of the Human Sciences in the Age of Humans: A Note.” European Journal of Social Theory 20 (1): 39–43.

–. 2017b. “The Politics of Climate Change Is More Than the Politics of Capitalism.” Theory, Culture & Society 34 (2-3): 25–37.

–. 2017c. “Afterword.” The South Atlantic Quarterly 116 (1): 163-168.

–. 2018. “The Seventh History and Theory Lecture: Anthropocene Time.” History and Theory 57 (1): 5–32.

–. 2019. “The Planet: An Emergent Humanist Category.” Critical Inquiry 46: 1–31.

–. 2021. The Climate of History in a Planetary Age. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.

Chandler, David, and Julian Reid. 2020. “Becoming Indigenous: The ‘Speculative Turn’ in Anthropology and the (Re)colonization of Indigeneity.” Postcolonial Studies 23 (4): 485–504.

Chandler, David. 2018a. “Biopolitics 2.0: Reclaiming the Power of Life in the Anthropocene.” Contemporary Political Theory 19: 14–20.

–. 2018b. Ontopolitics in the Anthropocene. An Introduction to Mapping, Sensing and Hacking. London: Routledge.

Charbonnier, Pierre, Salmon Gidas, and Peter Skafish. 2016. “Introduction.” In: Charbonnier, Pierre, Gidas Salmon, and Peter Skafish, eds. Comparative Metaphysics: Ontology After Anthropology. London: Rowman & Littlefield International, pp.: 1–24.

Charbonnier, Pierre. 2017. “A Genealogy of the Anthropocene: The End of Risk and Limits.” Annales HSS (English Edition) 72 (2): 199–224.

–. 2020. “‘Where Is Your Freedom Now?’ How the Moderns Became Ubiquitous.” In: Bruno Latour, and Peter Weibel, eds. Critical Zones: The Science and Politics of Landing on Earth. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp.: 76–79.

Citton, Yvess. 2016. “Fictional Attachments and Literary Weavings in the Anthropocene.” New Literary History 47 (2/3): 309–329.

Clark Nigel, and Katerin Yusoff. 2017. “Geosocial Formations and the Anthropocene.” Theory, Culture & Society 34 (2.3): 3–23.

Clark, Nigel et al. 2022. “A Solid Fluids Lexicon.” Theory, Culture & Society 39 (2): 197–210.

Clark, Nigel, and Bronislaw Szerszynski. 2021. Planetary Social Thought: The Anthropocene Challenge to the Social Sciences. Cambridge: Polity Press.

Crossley, Nick. 2001. The Social Body: Habit, Identity and Desire. London: Sage Publications.

–. 2006. Reflexive Embodiment in Contemporary Society: The Body in Late Modern Society. Buckingham: Open University Press.

Delanty, Gerard, and Aurea Mota. 2017. “Governing the Anthropocene: Agency, Governance, Knowledge.” European Journal of Social Theory 20 (1): 9–38.

Descola, Philippe. 2013a. Beyond Nature and Culture. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

–. 2013b. Ecology of Others. Chicago, IL: Prickly Paradigm Press.

Downey, Greg. 2014. “‘Habitus in Extremis’: From Embodied Culture to Bio-Cultural Development.” Body & Society 20: 113–117.

Doyle, Julie. 2011. Mediating Climate Change. Farnham: Ashgate Publishing.

Durkheim, Emile. 2005. “The Dualism of Human Nature and its Social Conditions.” Durkheimian Studies 11: 35–45.

Escobar, Arthuro. 2016. “Thinking-feeling with the Earth: Territorial Struggles and the Ontological Dimension of the Epistemologies of the South.” Revista de Antropología Iberoamericana 11 (1): 11–32.

Felski, Rita. 2015. The Limits of Critique. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

Foucault, Michele. 2005. The Order of Things: An archaeology of the Human Sciences. London: Routledge.

–. 2008. The Birth of Biopolitics. Lectures at the College de France 1978–79. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

Giddens, Anthony. 1992. The Transformation of Intimacy. Sexuality, Love, and Eroticism in Modern Societies. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

Grear, Anna. 2020. “Legal Imaginaries and the Anthropocene: ‘Of’ and ‘For’.” Law and Critique 31 (2020): 351–366.

Grosz, Elizabeth, Katerin Yusoff, and Nigel Clark. 2017. “An Interview with Elizabeth Grosz: Geopower, Inhumanism and the Biopolitical.” Theory, Culture & Society 34 (2-3): 129–146.

Grosz, Elizabeth. 2010. “The Untimeliness of Feminist Theory.” NORA - Nordic Journal of Feminist and Gender Research 18 (1): 48–51.

Grusin, Richard. 2017. “Introduction. Anthropocene Feminism: An Experiment in Collaborative Theorizing.” In: Grusin, Richard, ed. Anthropocene Feminism. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press, pp.: vii-xix.

Hannigan, John. 2006. Environmental Sociology. London: Routledge.

Haraway, Donna. 1991. Simians, Cyborgs and Women: The Reinvention of Nature.

New York, NY: Routledge.

–. 2016. “Staying with the Trouble: Anthropocene, Capitalocene, Chthulucene.” In: Moore, Jason, ed. Anthropocene or Capitalocene? Nature, History, and the Crisis of Capitalism. Oakland: PM Press-Kairos, pp.: 34–76.

Harman, Graham. 2016. Immaterialism: Objects and Social Theory. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.

–. 2018. Speculative Realism: An Introduction. London: Wiley.

Huffer, Lynne. 2017. “Foucault’s Fossils: Life Itself and the Return to Nature in Feminist Philosophy.” In: Grusin, Richard, ed. Anthropocene Feminism. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press, pp.: 65–88.

Ingold, Tim, and Gisli Palsson, eds. 2013. Biosocial Becomings: Integrating Social and Biological Anthropology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Ingold, Tim. 2000. The Perception of the Environment: Essays on Livelihood, Dwelling and Skill. London: Routledge.

–. 2007. Lines: A Brief History. London: Routledge.

–. 2015. The Life of Lines. London: Routledge.

Jensen, Casper Brunn. 2022. “Thinking the New Earth: Cosmoecology and New Alliances in the Anthropocene.” Darshika: Journal of Integrative and Innovative Humanities 2 (1): 26–43.

Knorr-Cetina, Karin. 1999. Epistemic Cultures: How do Sciences Make Knowledge. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Kronfeldner, Maria. 2018. What’s Left of Human Nature? A Post-Essentialist, Pluralist, and Interactive Account of a Contested Concept. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Lancaster, Roger. 2003. The Trouble with Nature: Sex in Science and Popular Culture. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

Latour, Bruno, and Timothy Lenton. 2019. “Extending the Domain of Freedom, or Why Gaia Is So Hard to Understand.” Critical Inquiry 45 (3): 659–680.

Latour, Bruno. 1987. Science in Action: How to Follow Scientists and Engineers Through Society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

–. 1993. We Have Never Been Modern. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

–. 1999. Pandora’s Hope: Essays on the Reality of Science Studies. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

–. 2004. Politics of Nature: How to Bring the Sciences into Democracy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

–. 2005. Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

–. 2010. On the Modern Cult of Factish Gods. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

–. 2013. An Inquiry Into Modes of Existence. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

–. 2017a. Facing Gaia: Eight Lectures on the New Climatic Regime. Cambridge: Polity Press.

–. 2017b. “Why Gaia is not a God of Totality.” Theory, Culture & Society 34 (2- 3): 61–81.

–. 2018. Down to Earth: Politics in the New Climatic Regime. Cambridge: Polity Press.

–. 2020a. “Composing the New Body Politic from Bits and Pieces.” In: Latour, Bruno, Simon Schaffer, and Pasquale Gagliardi, eds. A Book of the Body Politic: Connecting Biology, Politics and Social Theory. Venice: Fondazione Giorgio Cini, pp.: 19–38.

–. 2020b. “Seven objections against landing on Earth.” In: Latour, Bruno, and Peter Weibel, eds. Critical Zones: The Science and Politics of Landing on Earth. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp.: 1–18.

–. 2020c. ““We Don’t Seem to Live on the Same Planet” – A Fictional Planetar- ium.” In: Latour, Bruno, and Peter Weibel, eds. Critical Zones: The Science and Politics of Landing on Earth. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp.: 193–199.

Law, Јohn. 1999. “After Ant: Complexity, Naming and Topology.” The Sociological Review (47): 1–14.

–. 2004. After Method. Mess in Social Science Research. London: Routledge.

–. 2011. “Knowledge places.” In: Linking STS and the Social Sciences: Transforming ‘the Social’? 28-29th October at Kookmin University, Seoul, South Korea.

Lenton Timothy, Sebastian Dutreuil, and Bruno Latour. 2020. “Life on Earth is Hard to Spot.” The Anthropocene Review 7 (3): 248–272.

Lenton, Timothy, and Bruno Latour. 2018. “Gaia 2.0 Could Humans Add Some Level of Self-awareness to Earth’s Self-regulation?.” Science 361 (6407): 1066–1068.

Lewontin, Richard. 1996. Biology as Ideology: The Doctrine of DNA. Toronto: House of Anansi Press.

Lock, Margareth, and Gisli Palsson. 2016. Can Science Resolve the Nature-Nurture Debate? Cambridge: Polity Press.

Lorimer, Jamie. 2017. “The Anthropo-scene: A Guide for the Perplexed.” Social Studies of Science 47 (1): 117–142.

Lövbrand, Eva, et al. 2015. “Who Speaks for the Future of Earth? How Critical Social science can Extend the Conversation on the Anthropocene.” Global Environmental Change 32: 211–218.

Macnaghten, Phil, and John Urry. 2001. “Introduction.” In: Macnaghten, Phil, and John Urry, eds. Bodies of Nature. London: Sage Publications, pp.: 1–11.

Malm, Anders, and Alf Hornborg. 2014. “The Geology of Mankind? A Critique of the Anthropocene Narrative.” The Anthropocene Review 1 (1): 62–69.

Marx, Karl, and Freidrich Engels. 1998. The German Ideology. Buffalo, NY: Prometheus.

Matthews, Daniel. 2019. “Law and Aesthetics in the Anthropocene: From the Rights of Nature to the Aesthesis of Obligations.” Law, Culture and the Humanities 19 (2): 227-247.

–. 2021. “Reframing Sovereignty for the Anthropocene.” Transnational Legal Theory 12 (1): 44–77.

Meloni, Maurizio, Rachael Wakefield-Rann, and Becky Mansfield. 2022. “Bodies of the Anthropocene: On the Interactive Plasticity of Earth Systems and Biological Organisms.” The Anthropocene Review 9 (3): 473–493.

Moore, Jason. 2016. “Introduction: Anthropocene or Capitalocene? Nature, History, and the Crisis of Capitalism.” In: Moore, Jason, ed. Anthropocene or Capitalocene? Nature, History, and the Crisis of Capitalism. Oakland: Kairos, pp.: 1–13.

Morton, Timothy. 2013. Hyperobjects: Philosophy and Ecology after the End of the World. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

–. 2016. Dark Ecology For a Logic of Future Coexistence. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.

–. 2018. Being Ecological. Boston MA: MIT Press.

Muecke, Stephen. 2016. “An Ecology of Institutions: Recomposing the Humanities.” New Literary History 47 (2/3): 231–248.

Nelson, Sara, and Bruce Braun. 2017. “Autonomia in the Anthropocene: New Challenges to Radical Politics.” South Atlantic Quarterly 116 (2): 223–235.

Newton, Tim. 2007. Nature and Sociology. London: Routledge.

Palsson, Gisli, and Heather Swanson. 2016. “Down to Earth: Geosocialities and Geopolitics.” Environmental Humanities 8 (2): 149–171.

Pellizzoni, Luigi. 2015. Ontological Politics in a Disposable World: The New Mastery of Nature. Farnham: Ashgate.

–. 2022. “A different Kind of Emancipation? From Lifestyle to Form-of-Life.” European Journal of Social Theory 25 (1): 155–171.

Povinelli, Elizabeth. 2016. Geontologies: A Requiem to Late Liberalism. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

–. 2017a. “The Ends of Humans: Anthropocene, Autonomism, Antagonism, and the Illusions of Our Epoch.” South Atlantic Quarterly 116 (2): 293–310.

–. 2017b. “The Three Figures of Geontology.” In: Grusin, Richard, ed. Anthropocene Feminism. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press, pp.: 49–64.

Prinz, Jessie. 2012. Beyond Human Nature: How Culture and Experience Shape the Human Mind. New York, NY: W. W. Norton & Company.

Sahlins, Marshall. 2008. The Western Illusion of Human Nature. Chicago, IL: Prickly Paradigm Press.

Savransky, Martin. 2012. “Worlds in the Making: Social Sciences and the Ontopolitics of Knowledge.” Postcolonial Studies 15 (3): 351–368.

–. 2021. “After Progress: Notes for an Ecology of Perhaps.” Ephemera: Theory & Politics in Organization 21 (1): 267–281.

Sheller, Mimi, and John Urry. 2006. “The New Mobilities Paradigm.” Environment and Planning A. 38 (2): 207–226.

–. 2016. “Mobilizing the New Mobilities Paradigm.” Applied Mobilities. doi: 10.1080/23800127.2016.1151216.

Simonetti, Christian, and Tim Ingold. 2018. “Ice and Concrete: Solid Fluids of Environmental Change.” Journal of Contemporary Archaeology 5 (1): 19–31.

Simonetti, Christian. 2019. “The Petrified Anthropocene.” Theory, Culture & Society 36 (7-8): 45–66.

Sklair, Leslie. 2017. “Sleepwalking through the Anthropocene.” The British Journal of Sociology 68 (4): 775–784.

Stengers, Isabelle. 2010. Cosmopolitics I. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.

–. 2017. “Autonomy and the Intrusion of Gaia.” South Atlantic Quarterly 116 (2): 381–400.

Strathern, Marilyn. 2018. “Opening up Relations.” In: de la Cadena, Marisol, and Mario Blaser, eds. A World of Many Worlds. New York, NY: Duke University Press, pp.: 23–52.

Sun-Hee Park, Lisa, and David Naguib Pellow. 2019. “Forum 4: the Environmental Privilege of Borders in the Anthropocene.” Mobilities 14 (3): 395–400.

Swyngedouw, Eric, and Henrik Ernstson. 2018. “Interrupting the Anthropo-obScene: Immuno-biopolitics and Depoliticizing Ontologies in the Anthropocene.” Theory, Culture & Society 35 (6): 3–30.

Szerszynski, Bronislaw. 2005. Nature Technology and the Sacred. London: Wiley.

–. 2012. “The End of the End of Nature: The Anthropocene and the Fate of the Human.” Oxford Literary Review 34 (2): 165–184.

–. 2016. “Planetary Mobilities: Movement, Memory and Emergence in the Body of the Earth.” Mobilities 11 (4): 614–628.

–. 2018. “Drift as a Planetary Phenomenon.” Performance Research 23 (7): 136–144.

–. 2019. “A Planetary Turn for the Social Sciences?.” In: Jensen, Ole, Sven Kesselring, and Mimi Sheller, eds. Mobilities and Complexities. London: Routledge, pp.: 223–227.

Tyfield, David, and Anders Blok. 2016. “Doing Methodological Cosmopolitanism in a Mobile World.” Mobilities 11:4: 629–641.

Ulmer, Jasmine. 2017. “Posthumanism as Research Methodology: Inquiry in the Anthropocene”, International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education 30 (9): 832–848.

Viveiros de Castro, Eduardo. 2014. Cannibal Metaphysics: For a Post-structural Anthropology. Minneapolis, MN: Univocal Publishing.

–. 2015. “Who is Afraid of the Ontological Wolf? Some Comments on an Ongoing Anthropological Debate.” The Cambridge Journal of Anthropology 33 (1): 2–17.

–. 2019. “On Models and Examples. Engineers and Bricoleurs in the Anthropocene.” Current Anthropology 60 (20): 296–308.

Wacquant, Loïc. 2014. “Putting Habitus in its Place: Rejoinder to the Symposium.” Body & Society 20: 118–139.

Wakefield, Stephanie, Kevine Grove, and David Chandler. 2020. “Introduction: The Power of Life.” In: Wakefield, Stephanie, Kevine Grove, and David Chandler, eds. Resilience in the Anthropocene. Governance and Politics at the End of the World. London: Routledge, pp.: 1–22.

Zalasiewicz, Jan et al. 2019. “A General Introduction to the Anthropocene.” In: Zalasiewicz, Jan, Colin Waters, Mark Williams, and Colin Summerhayes, eds. The Anthropocene as a Geological Time Unit: A Guide to the Scientific Evidence and Current Debate. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp.: 2–4.