Credit, Debt and Money as Social Institutions of Trust
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.2298/FID2302273PKeywords:
credit, debt, money, trust, society, capitalismAbstract
While the notions of credit, debt and money are today almost exclusively associated with economic discourse, their semantic fields prove to be significantly wider and more complex. This article seeks to restore the repressed meanings of these three notions. Its aim consists of a deconstruction of the dominant economic narratives on credit, debt, money and trust, that would show that these concepts should be primarily considered as social, rather than solely economic institutions. Therefore, in the introduction we will look at the etymology of the word credit and disclose its semantic proximity with magic as a social practice. Furthermore, the first section will examine the intrinsic relation between debt and credit, departing from Marcel Hénaff’s three types of symbolic debt and exposing how these shape the financial credit in neoliberal capitalism and install the creditor-debtor relation (such as Maurizio Lazzarato describes it) as predominant at all levels of society. The second section shows how relations of credit and debt crystallize in the notion of money: firstly by exposing some major historical and anthropological insights about money; moreover, by considering money from an onto-axiological point of view as the knot in which all social relations of trust culminate; and finally, by relating the three different types of trust in money, proposed by French heterodox economists Michel Aglietta and André Orléan, to the three forms of symbolic debt, thus showing how credit, debt and money are fundamentally anchored in social relations.
References
Aglietta, Michel (2016), La monnaie: Entre dettes et souveraineté, Paris: Odile Jacob.
Aglietta, Michel; Orléan, André (eds.) (1998), La monnaie souveraine, Paris: Odile Jacob.
Benjamin, Walter (2004), “Capitalism as Religion”, in Marcus Bullock, Michael W. Jennings (eds.), Walter Benjamin: 1913–1926, Selected Writings, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. pp. 288–291.
Benveniste, Émile (2016), Dictionary of Indo-European Concepts and Society, Chicago: HAU Books.
Bojanić, Petar (2022), In-Statuere. Figures of Institutional Building, Frankfurt am Main: Vitorio Klostermann.
Ferraris, Maurizio (2009), Documentality: Why It Is Necessary to Leave Traces, New York: Fordham University Press.
Ferraris, Maurizio; Torrengo, Giuliano (2014), “Documentality: A Theory of Social Reality”, Rivista di estetica 57: 11–27.
Graeber, David (2011), Debt: The First 5,000 Years, Brooklyn, NY: Melville House Publishing.
Hénaff, Marcel (2010), The Price of Truth: Gift, Money and Philosophy, Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Lazzarato, Maurizio (2012), The Making of the Indebted Man: An Essay on the Neoliberal Condition, Los Angeles: Semiotext(e).
Malamoud, Charles (1989), Cuire le monde: rite et pensée dans l’Inde ancienne, Paris: É ditions la Dé couverte.
Mauss, Marcel (2001), A General Theory of Magic, London: Routledge.
Nietzsche, Friedrich (1989), On the Genealogy of Morals; Ecce Hommo, New York: Vintage Books.
Polanyi, Karl (2001), The Great Transformation: The Political and Economic Origins of Our Time, Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
Rousseau, Jean-Jacques (1993), Du contrat social, Paris: Gallimard.
Sartre, Jean-Paul (1976), L’être et le néant, Paris: Gallimard.
Vernant, Jean-Pierre; Vidal-Naquet, Pierre (1990), Myth and Tragedy in Ancient Greece, New York: Zone Books.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Articles published in Philosophy and Society are open-access in accordance with the CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 License.