Recognition as a Counterhegemonic Strategy

Marjan Ivković

doi:10.2298/FID2302257I

Authors

Marjan Ivković University of Belgrade, Institute for Philosophy and Social Theory

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.2298/FID2302257I

Keywords:

hegemony, post- Fordism, engagement, recognition, respect, trust

Abstract

Building on the analyses of cultural hegemony in the works of Nancy Fraser and Wendy Brown, I argue in the paper that the historic bloc (order of cultural hegemony) of post-Fordist capitalism is characterized by a particular dynamic between several ‘axes’ of hegemony that gives rise to the ‘paradox of engagement/disengagement’. The ‘progressive-expertocratic’ axis of hegemony creates a subject-position of the ‘engaged self’, a figure embodying a certain promise of political agency that is simultaneously obstructed by other, depoliticizing axes of hegemony. This dynamic is conducive to the rise of contemporary right-wing authoritarianism, which purports to fulfill this promise of political agency through a series of displacements – the counterhegemonic left, I argue, has so far not formulated an effective alternative to this strategy. In the second part, I explore the potential of Axel Honneth’s theory of recognition, in particular his concept of ‘interpersonal respect’, for grounding a left strategy of connecting (mutually articulating) the hegemonic figure of the ‘engaged self’ with a progressive politics of social transformation. To that end, I elaborate Honneth’s perspective by means of an argument about the role of trust in the context of societal crises that Igor Cvejić, Srđan Prodanović and I have recently formulated.

References

Althusser, Louis (2014), On the Reproduction of Capitalism: Ideology and Ideological State Apparatuses, London: Verso.

Anderson, Joel (1996), “Translator’s Introduction”, in Axel Honneth, The Struggle for Recognition: The Moral Grammar of Social Conflicts, Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, pp. x –xxi.

—. (2000) “The Third Generation of the Frankfurt School”, Intellectual History Newsletter 22 (1): 49–61.

—. (2011), “Situating Axel Honneth in the Frankfurt School Tradition”, in Danielle Petherbridge (ed.), Axel Honneth: Critical Essays, Leiden: Brill, pp. 31–57.

Boltanski, Luc (2011), On critique: A Sociology of Emancipation, Cambridge: Polity Press.

Brown, Wendy (2018), “Neoliberalism’s Frankenstein: Authoritarian Freedom in Twenty-First Century ‘Democracies’”, Critical Times 1 (1): 60–79.

Cvejić, Ivković; Prodanović, Srđan (2022), “Contingency and Social Change: Collective Engagement in Conditions of Radical Uncertainty”, Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour: 1–16 (online first).

Deranty, Jean-Philippe (2009), Beyond Communication: A Critical Study of Axel Honneth’s Social Philosophy, Leiden: Brill.

Fraser, Nancy (1989), Unruly Practices: Power, Discourse and Gender in Contemporary Social Theory, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

—. (2012), “Can Society be Commodities all the Way down? Post-Polanyian Reflections on Capitalist Crisis”, Economy and Society, 43 (4): 541–558.

—. (2017), “A Triple Movement? Parsing the Politics of Crisis after Polanyi”, in Marian Burchardt, Gal Kirn (eds.), Beyond Neoliberalism: Social Analysis after 1989, London: Palgrave Macmillan.

—. (2022), Cannibal Capitalism: How our System is Devouring Democracy, Care and the Planet – and What We can do about It, London: Verso.

Fraser, Nancy; Honneth, Axel (2003), Redistribution or Recognition? A Political-Philosophical Exchange, London: Verso.

Fraser, Nancy; Jaeggi, Rahel (2018), Capitalism: A Conversation in Critical Theory, Cambridge: Polity Press.

Geuss, Raymond (2008), “Philosophical Anthropology and Social Criticism”, in Axel Honneth (ed.), Reification: A New Look at an Old Idea, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 120 –130.

Gramsci, Antionio (1995), Further Selections from the Prison Notebooks, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

Hall, Stuart (1986), “The Problem of Ideology – Marxism without Guarantees”, Journal of Communication Inquiry 10 (2): 28–44.

Honneth, Axel (1996), The Struggle for Recognition: The Moral Grammar of Social Conflicts, Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

—. (2002), “Grounding Recognition: A Rejoinder to Critical Questions”, Inquiry: an Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 45 (4): 499–519.

—. (2007), Disrespect: the Normative Foundations of Critical Theory, Cambridge: Polity Press.

—. (2011)‚“Rejoinder”, in Danielle Petherbridge (ed.), Axel Honneth: Critical Essays, Leiden: Brill.

Joseph, Jonathan (2002), Hegemony: A realist analysis, London: Routledge.

—. (2017), “The hegemony of governmentality: Towards a research agenda”, All Azimuth 6 (2): 5–18.

Laclau, Ernesto; Mouffe, Chantal (1985), Hegemony and Socialist Strategy: Towards a Radical-Democratic Politics, London: Verso.

McNay, Lois (2008), Against Recognition, Cambridge: Polity Press.

Polanyi, Karl (2001), The Great Transformation: The Political and Economic Origins of our Time, Boston: Beacon Press.

Van den Brink, Bert; Owen, David (2007), Recognition and Power: Axel Honneth and the Tradition of Critical Social Theory, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Williams, Raymond (2005), Culture and Materialism, London: Verso.