Institutional Ethics of Care in Serbia during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Case Study on the Effects of the Lockdown Measures on Girls and Women Trafficking Survivors

Jelena Ćeriman; Jelena Hrnjak; Andrijana Radoičić Nedeljković

doi:10.2298/FID2204895C

Authors

Jelena Ćeriman University of Belgrade, Institute for Philosophy and Social Theory
Jelena Hrnjak “Atina” – Citizens’ Association for Combating Trafficking in Human Beings and All Forms of Violence against Women
Andrijana Radoičić Nedeljković “Atina” – Citizens’ Association for Combating Trafficking in Human Beings and All Forms of Violence against Women

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.2298/FID2204895C

Keywords:

COVID-19 pandemic, lockdown measures, institutional ethics of care, victims of human trafficking, trafficking in person survivors, Serbia

Abstract

Extreme situations such as the COVID-19 pandemic transparently show all the shortcomings of the Serbian system that should, in theory, provide support and protection to citizens in such circumstances. A particularly demanding task was to determine and measure the well-being of individuals during the pandemic, especially those from marginalized groups whose needs are not the priority to the system even under regular circumstances, those on the bottom of the social hierarchy who cannot influence the policies that shape their daily lives, or the decisions of authorities that further reproduce social inequalities. The paper examines institutional ethics of care during the pandemic in Serbia through the analysis of the adequacy of lockdown measures and their effects on the girls and women trafficking survivors. Analysis of the data collected in semi-structured interviews with girls and women showed that three central elements of the institutional (ethics of) care: the purpose of care, recognition of power relations, and the need for pluralistic tailoring of care to meet individuals’ needs, were not fulfilled during the pandemic and that the logic of institutional care has had a politicizing character in Serbia.

References

Fuko, Mišel (1982), Istorija seksualnosti 1. Volja za znanjem, Beograd: Prosveta.

—. (1997), Nadzirati i kažnjavati. Nastanak zatvora, Novi Sad: IK Zorana Stojanovića.

Koggel, Christine M. (1998), Perspectives on Equality: Constructing a Relational Theory, Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.

Milutinović Bojanić, Sanja (2016), „Uvod – Teorijska utemeljenost istraživanja“, in Sanja Milutinović Bojanić, Jelena Ćeriman, Verica Pavić Zentner (eds.), Siromaštvo, ruralnost, rod: Istraživanje funkcionisanja sistema socijalne zaštite u ruralnim oblastima Srbije, Beograd: Centar za etiku, pravo i primenjenu filozofiju; Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju Univerziteta u Beogradu, pp. 9–18.

Nedelsky, Jennifer (2008), “Reconceiving Rights and Constitutionalism”, Journal of Human Rights 7 (2): 139–173.

Tronto, Joan C. (2010), “Creating Caring Institutions: Politics, Plurality, and Purpose”, Ethics and Social Welfare 4 (2), (internet) available at: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/17496535.2010.484259 (viewed 15 September 2022).

Šantić, Danica; Antić, Marija (2020), “Serbia in the time of COVID-19: between “corona diplomacy”, tough measures and migration management”, Eurasian Geography and Economics 61 (4-5), (internet) available at: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/15387216.2020.1780457 (viewed 1 November, 2022).

Waerness, Kari (1984a), “‘Caring as Women’s Work in the Welfare State’”, in Harriet Holter (ed.), Patriarchy in a Welfare Society, Oslo: Universitetsforlaget, pp. 67–87.

—. (1984b), “The Rationality of Caring”, Economic and Industrial Democracy 5 (2): 185–211.

—. (1990) “Informal and Formal Care in Old Age: What is Wrong with the New Ideology in Scandinavia Today?”, in Kari Waerness (ed.), Gender and Caring: Work and Welfare in Britain and Scandinavia, London: Harvester Wheatsheaf, pp. 110–132.