Testimony in Stone: Architecture of War from Kluge to Herscher and Weizman

Authors

  • Marija Ratković University of Arts in Belgrade

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.2298/FID2203535R

Keywords:

architecture, war, film, Holocaust studies, warchitecture, forensic architecture, performative, cultural memory, Alexander Kluge

Abstract

The article contributes to creating an outline of the significant postwar theoretical approaches that examine the role, purpose, and significance of architecture in war and war crimes. Starting from the Clausewitz thesis that “war is not autonomous”, this paper attempts to reveal “the blood that has dried in the codes” (Foucault), politics hidden behind the four walls of architecture. From the concepts of Brutality in Stone (Kluge), Warchitecture (Herscher) or Forensic Architecture (Weizman), through the lenses of architecture, the article exposes war, politics, and ideologies that shape and drive architecture by reimagining and repurposing it both in its primary, functional and cultural, representative sense. A shift from “the era of the witness” (Felman) to the decade of evidence (Weizman) promotes architecture and its remains to the level of science, global governing, and law. The connection of timely-distanced emancipatory practices influenced by Holocaust studies establishes a discursive field for architecture as a performative rather than representative practice. The theoretical frame of the postwar landscape as second nature (Adorno) is crucial for discussing the role of architecture in the Holocaust. Furthermore, it stresses the work of Herscher and Weizman as a contribution to the critique of the depoliticized processes of resolution of the contemporary war crimes and post-conflict reconciliation. Architecture as a societal practice could potentially have a central position in memory and knowledge production, as well as the production of a counter-public sphere.

References

Adorno, Theodor W. (1955), “Cultural Criticism and Society”, in Theodor W. Adorno, Prisms, Harvard: MIT Press, pp. 17–34.

Adorno, Theodor W. (1986), “What Does Coming to Terms with the Past Mean?”, in Bitburg in Moral and Political Perspective, Geoffrey Hartman (ed.), Timothy Bahti and Geoffrey Hartman (transl.), Bloomington: Indiana UP, pp. 114–129.

Adorno, Theodor W. (1984), “Idea of Natural History”, Robert Hullot-Kentor (transl.), Telos 60: 111–124.

Agamben, Giorgio (1998), Remnants of Auschwitz, Cambridge, Massachusets: MIT Press.

Arendt, Hannah (1958), The Human Condition, Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Benjamin, Walter (1968), “The Work of Art in the Age of Mechanical Reproduction”, in Walter Benjamin, Illuminations, New York: Harcourt, Brace & World, pp. 219–253.

Bevan, Robert (2006), The Destruction of Memory: Architecture at War, London: Reaktion.

Bogdanović, Bogdan (1995), “The City and Death”, in Jeri Labon (ed.), Balkan Blues: Writing Out of Yugoslavia, Evanston: Northwestern University Press, pp. 37–74.

Boym, Svetlana (2011), “Ruinophilia: Appreciation of Ruins”, (internet) available at: https://http://monumenttotransformation.org/atlas-of-transformation/html/r/ ruinophilia/ruinophilia-appreciation-of-ruins-svetlana-boym.html (viewed 14 April, 2022).

Childers, Joseph; Hentzi, Gary (1995), The Columbia Dictionary of Modern Literary and Cultural Criticism, New York: Columbia University Press.

Clausewitz, Carl V. (1940), On War, New York: E.P. Dutton and Co., LTD. Czepczynski, Mariusz (2008), Cultural Landscapes of Post-Socialist Cities: Representation of Powers and Needs, Oxfordshire: Taylor & Francis.

Deleuze, Gilles (2005), Cinema 2: The Time Image, London: Continuum.

Feldman, Allen (1991), Formations of Violence: The Narrative of the Body and Political Terror in Northern Ireland, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Felman, Shoshana (1991), “The Return of the Voice: Claude Lanzmann’s Shoah”, in Shoshana Felman, Dori Laub (eds.), Testimony: Crises of Witnessing in Literature, Psychoanalysis and History, Taylor & Francis Group, pp. 204–283.

Foucault, Michel (2003), Society Must Be Defended, New York: Picador.

Guerin, Frances (2021), “Re-presenting histories: Documentary Film and Architectural Ruins in Brutality in Stone”, Alphaville: Journal of Film and Screen Media 21: 13–34. doi: 10.33178/alpha.21.01

Handcock, Percy S. P. (1920), The Code of Hammurabi, London and New York: Society for Promoting Christian Knowledge.

Heller, Charles (2015), Liquid Trajectories: Documenting Illegalised Migration and the Violence of Borders, Doctoral thesis, Goldsmiths, University of London [Thesis].

Herscher, Andrew (2007), “Urbicide, Urbanism, and Urban Destruction in Kosovo”, Theory & Event 10 (2). https://doi.org/doi:10.1353/tae.2007.0062

Herscher, Andrew (2008), “Warchitectural Theory”, Journal of Architectural Education (1984) 61 (3), 35–43. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1531-314X.2007.00167.x

Herscher, Andrew (2010), Violence Taking Place, Standford, California: Standford University Press.

Higson, Andrew (1989), “The Concept of National Cinema”, in Alan Williams (ed.), Film and Nationalism, London: Rutgers University Press, pp. 52–67.

Hillgruber, Andraes; Picker, Henry (eds.) (1968), Hitlers Tischgespräche im Führerhauptquartier 1941–1942, Munich: Deutscher Taschenbuchverlag.

Huyssen, Andreas (1988), “An Analytic Storyteller in the Course of Time”, October 46: 117–128. https://doi.org/10.2307/778682.

Huyssen, Andreas (2000), “Present Pasts: Media, Politics, Amnesia”, Public Culture 12 (1): 21–38. https://doi.org/10.1215/08992363-12-1-21.

Huyssen, Andreas (2006), “Nostalgia for Ruins”, Grey Room 23 23: 6–21. https://doi. org/10.1162/grey.2006.1.23.6.

Huyssen, Andreas (2010), “Authentic Ruins: Products of Modernity”, in Julia Hell, Andreas Schönle (eds.), Ruins of Modernity, Durham, NP: Duke UP, pp. 17–28.

Jameson, Frederic (1991), Postmodernism, or The Cultural Logic Of Late Capitalism, Durham: Duke University Press.

Keenan, Thomas; Weizman, Eyal (eds.) (2011), Mengele’s Skull: Special Issue of Cabinet Journal, Cabinet (43).

Keenan, Thomas; Weizman, Eyal (2012), Mengele’s Skull: The Advent of a Forensic Aesthetics, Berlin: Sternberg and Portikus.

Kobolt, Katja; Zdravković, Lana (eds.) (2014), Performative Gestures, Political Moves, Ljubljana: City of Woman Association for the Promotion of Women in Culture.

Kochenrath, Hans-Peter (1975), “Kontinuität im deutschen Film”, in Wilfred von Bredow, Rolf Zurek (eds.), Film und Gesellschaft in Deutschland: Dokumente und Malerialien, Hamburg: Hoffman und Campe, pp. 286–292.

Komoli, Žan-Luj (1982), “Tehnika i ideologija”, Filmske sveske: časopis za teoriju filma i filmologiju 14 (1-2): 97–153.

Krier, Léon (2013), Albert Speer Architecture 1932–1942, New York: The Monacelli Press.

Liebman, Stuart (1988), “Why Kluge?”, October 46: 4–22.

Močnik, Rastko (1999), 3 Teorije: Ideologija, Nacija, Institucija, Ljubljana: Založba /*c.

Moorhouse, Roger (2010), Berlin at War: Life and Death in Hitler’s Capital, 1939-1945, London: Bodley Head.

Negt, Oskar; Kluge, Alexander (1993), Public Sphere and Experience: Toward an Analysis of the Bourgeois and Proletarian Public Sphere, Theory and History of Literature, Vol. 85, Minneapolis, London: University of Minnesota Press.

Rancière, Jacques (2004), The Politics of Aesthetics: The Distribution of the Sensible, Gabriel Rockhill (ed. and transl.), New York: Continuum.

Rentschler, Eric (1990), “Remembering Not to Forget: A Retrospective Reading of Kluge’s Brutality in Stone”, New German Critique 49: 23–41. https://doi. org/10.2307/488372.

Saussure, Ferdinand; Culler, Jonathan D.; Bally, Charles; Sechehaye, Albert; Baskin, Wade (1974), Course in General Linguistics, London: Fontana.

Shaw, Martin (2004), “New Wars of the City: ‘Urbicide’ and ‘Genocide’”, in Stephen Graham (ed.), Cities, War and Terrorism: Towards an Urban Geopolitics, London: Blackwell, pp. 141–153.

Shoshan, Malkit (2015), “Andrew Herscher: Warchitecture / Post-Warchitecture”, Archis 11, (internet) available at: https://archis.org/volume/ volume-11-andrew-herscher-warchitecture-post-warchitecture/

Shoop, Casey (2016), “The Bones in the Concept: Big History, Theodor Adorno and Second Nature”, History of the Present 6 (1): 63–86. https://doi.org/10.5406/ historypresent.6.1.0063.

Speer, Albert (1970), Inside the Third Reich, Richard Winston, Clara Winston (transl.), New York: The Macmillan Company.

Urang, John Griffith (2013), “Solitary Confinement: Reproduction and the Law in Kluge’s ‘Abschied von Gestern’”, New German Critique 120: 111–135.

Weizman, Eyal (2010), “Forensic Architecture: Only the Criminal Can Solve the Crime”, Radical Philosophy 164 (9): 9–24.

—. (2012), Forensic Architecture: Notes from Fields and Forums = Forensische Architektur: Notizen Von Feldern Und Foren, Ostfildern: Hatje Cantz.

—. (2017), “Forensic Architecture: Political Practice, Activism, Aesthetics”, in Suzanne Hall, Ricky Burdett (eds.), The SAGE Handbook of the 21st century city, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications Ltd, pp. 630–652. https://dx.doi. org/10.4135/9781526402059.n35

Weizman, Eyal; Manfredi, Zachary (2013), “‘From Figure to Ground’: A Conversation with Eyal Weizman on the Politics of The Humanitarian Present”, Qui Parle 22 (1): 167–192. https://doi.org/10.5250/quiparle.22.1.0167.

Weizman, Eyal; Gandorfer, Daniela (2021), “Epilogue: Theory, Momentarily”, Theory & Event 24 (1): 399-410.

Werner, Jochmann (ed.) (1980), Adolf Hitler. Monologe im Führerhauptquartier 1941–1944, Hamburg: Albrecht Knaus

Published

29.09.2022

How to Cite

Ratković, M. (2022) “Testimony in Stone: Architecture of War from Kluge to Herscher and Weizman”, Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society. Belgrade, Serbia, 33(3), pp. 535–550. doi: 10.2298/FID2203535R.