How Technology Impacts Communication and Identity-Creation
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.2298/FID2202297ZKeywords:
communication, identity, personality, language, technologyAbstract
The basic thesis of this paper is that communication is a fundamental activity of all human practices and that identity is constructed with the help of communication. Defining identity cannot be explained and understood exclusively from the standpoint of philosophy, sociology, political science or psychology. Given that the Latin root of the word communication, communio, refers to community, we can say that communication as a science best covers the relationships that people establish within the community such as schools, families, work environment, social networks and forums. The activity of communication is the establishment of a community, i.e., sociability. To communicate means to unite something – to bring one’s actions into harmony with the community and with social life. In that sense, communication is in its essence a transition from the individual to the collective.
In addition, any specific form of communication depends on the wider cultural and socio-political environment in which modern people operate. This paper aims to explore the impact of technology on individual identity, to answer questions about whether robots can have the same characteristics as personalities, and whether, and in what way, machines have an impact on people. The reason for asking such questions is the decision of the Committee on Legal Affairs of the European Parliament to pass a law that will grant autonomous robots the status of “electronic personalities”.
References
Asimov, Isaac (1950), “Runaround”, in I, Robot, New York: Doubleday.
Bostrom, Nick (2014), Superintelligence: Paths, Dangers, Strategies, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Collins, Tim (2022), “Sophia the robot’s creator, Dr David Hanson, claims humans will marry life-like droids by 2045”, (internet) available at: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-5767077/Sophia-robots-creator-says-humans-marry-life-like-droids-civil-rights-2045.html (viewed 5 May, 2022)
Davidson, Donald (1991), “James Joyce and Humpty Dumpty”, Midwest Studies in Philosophy 16 (1): 1–12.
Delvaux, Mady (2022), „Nacrt izvješća s preporukama Komisiji o pravilima građanskog prava o robotici“ (internet) available at: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=//EP//NONSGML+COMPARL+
PE-582.443+01+DOC+PDF+V0//HR (viewed 5 May, 2022).
Dick, Philip K. (1981), VALIS, New York: Mariner Books.
Freud, Sigmund (2009), A General Introduction to Psychoanalysis, USA: Martino Fine Books.
Fukujama, Frensis (2003), Naša posthumana budućnost, Podgorica: CID.
Fukuyama, Francis (2019), Identity: The Demand for Dignity and the Politics of Resentment, UK: Profile Books Ltd.
Gahagen, Džudit (1978), Interpersonalno i grupno ponašanje, Beograd: Nolit.
Greenfield Adam (2017), Radical Technologies: The Design of Everyday Life, London: Verso.
Habermas, Jürgen (1979), Communication and the Evolution of the Society, London: Heinemann.
—. (1991), The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere: An Inquiry into a Category of Bourgeois Society, Studies in Contemporary German Social Thought, UK: The MIT Press.
Hanson, David (2017), Humanizing Robots: How making humanoids can make us more human, Editorial: Independently published.
Hasselbalch, Gry (2022), “New EU rules for the ethical and legal status of robots and AI”, (internet) available at: https://dataethics.eu/en/new-eu-rules-ethical-legal-status-robots-ai/ (viewed 6 May, 2022).
Hayles, Katherine (1999), How We Became Posthuman: Virtual Bodies in Cybernetics, Literature, and Informatics, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Jung, G. Carl (2006), The Undiscovered Self: The Dilemma of the Individual in Modern Society, Boston: Berkley.
Kitler, Fridrih (2018), Optički mediji, Beograd: Fakultet za medije i komunikacije.
Kurzweil, Raymond (2001), The Age of Spiritual Machines, UK: Texere Publishing.
—. (2005), The Singularity Is Near: When Humans Transcend Biology, UK: Penguin Books
Lakan, Žak (1983), Spisi, Beograd: Prosveta.
Latur, Bruno (2017), Mreže, društva, sfere, Beograd: Fakultet za medije i komunikacije
Luhmann, Niklas (1990), “Technology, Environment and Social Risk: A Systems Perspective”, Industrial Crisis Quarterly 4: 223–231.
Makluan, Maršal (2012), Elektronski mediji i kraj elektronske pismenosti, Beograd: Karpos.
Mandić, Tijana (2003), Komunikologija – psihologija pregovaranja, Beograd: Clio.
Marcuse, Herbert (2013), One-Dimensional Man: Studies in the Ideology of Advanced Industrial Society, UK: Routledge.
More, Max; Vita-More, Natasha (2013), The Transhumanist Reader: Classical and Contemporary Essays on the Science, Technology, and Philosophy of the Human Future, New Jersey: Wiley-Blackwell.
Nietzsche, Friedrich (2014), Beyond Good and Evil, Florida: Millennium Publications.
Poster, Mark (2012) „Postmoderne virtuelnosti“, u Jelena Đorđević (ed.), Studije kulture, Beograd: Službeni glasnik, pp. 539–554.
Sarewitz, Daniel (1996), Frontiers of Illusion: Science, Technology, and the Politics of Progress, Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
Šušnjić, Đuro (1997), Ribari ljudskih duša, Beograd: Čigoja štampa.
Tomić, Zorica (2003), Komunikologija, Beograd: Čigoja štampa.
Wolfe, Cary (2009), What Is Posthumanism? (Posthumanities), Minnesota: University of Minnesota Press.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Articles published in Philosophy and Society are open-access in accordance with the CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 License.