Bourdieu’s Theory and the Social Constructivism of Berger and Luckmann
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.2298/FID2104518JKeywords:
Bourdieu, Berger & Luckmann, objectivism/subjectivism, body, language, power, knowledge, political viewsAbstract
The paper compares Pierre Bourdieu’s sociological approach with the one developed by Peter Berger and Thomas Luckmann. The aim of the paper is to identify the complementarities and incongruences of these approaches. The main similarity consists in the intention to “dialectically” overcome/bridge the gap between “objectivism” and “subjectivism” in social theory. Another parallel includes a negative attitude towards the relativistic tendencies of postmodernism. These authors share the thematization of: the body as a locus of social influences, the centrality of language in social life, the social functions of knowledge, and the importance of power in social relations. Differences in theorizing are attributed to the different intellectual, theoretical, and socio-cultural contexts in which these scientists operated. The divergences of these theoretical approaches become evident when one examines the different meaning and significance attached to the concepts of individuation, structure, action, habitus and habitualization, structure of relevance and relation of common-sense and scientific knowledge. Finally, there is a visible difference in political views: Bourdieu was a critic “from the left,” while Berger and Luckmann were self-proclaimed liberal conservatives.
References
Abercrombie, Nicholas (1986), “Knowledge, Order, and Human Autonomy”, in J. D. Hunter, S. C. Ainlay (eds.), Making Sense of Modern Times: Peter L. Berger and the Vision of Interpretive Sociology, London; New York: Routledge & K. Paul,
pp. 11–30.
Atkinson, Will (2020), Bourdieu and after: a Guide to Relational Phenomenology, New York: Routledge.
Berger, Peter L. (1971), “Sociology and Freedom”, The American Sociologist 6 (1): 1–5.
—. (1990), The Sacred Canopy: Elements of a Sociological Theory of Religion, New York: Anchor Books.
—. (1992a), “Reflections on the Twenty-Fifth Anniversary of the Social Construction of Reality”, Perspectives 15 (2): 1–2, 4.
—. (1992b), “Sociology: A Disinvitation?”, Society 30 (1): 12–18.
—. (2004), Invitation to Sociology: a Humanistic Perspective, New York: Anchor Books.
—. (2011) Adventures of an Accidental Sociologist: How to Explain the World without Becoming a Bore, Amherst, N.Y: Prometheus Books.
Berger, Peter L.; Kellner, Hansfried (1981), Sociology Reinterpreted: an Essay on Method and Vocation, Garden City, N.Y: Anchor Press/Doubleday.
Berger, Peter L.; Luckmann, Thomas (1991), The Social Construction of Reality:
a Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge, Harmondsworth: Penguin.
Birešev, Ana (2014), Orionov vodič: otkrivanje dominacije u sociologiji Pjera Burdijea, Beograd: Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju.
Bongaerts, Gregor (2019), “Habitualization and Habitus: on the Relation between Social Constructivism and the Theory of Practice”, in Michaela Pfadenhauer, Hubert Knoblauch (eds.), Social Constructivism as Paradigm? The Legacy of The Social Construction of Reality, New York: Routledge, pp. 251–258.
Bourdieu, Pierre (1977), “Sur le pouvoir symbolique”, Annales. Histoire, Sciences Sociales 32 (3): 405–411.
—. (1990a), In Other Words: Essays towards a Reflexive Sociology, Stanford: Stanford University Press.
—. (1990b), The Logic of Practice, Cambridge: Polity Press.
—. (2001), Masculine Domination, Cambridge: Polity Press.
—. (2002), Distinction: a Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
—. (2008), Sketch for a Self-analysis, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
—. (2010), Outline of a Theory of Practice, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
—. (2019), Habitus and Field. General Sociology, Volume 2. Lectures at the College de France (1982-1983), Cambridge: Polity Press.
Bourdieu, Pierre; Chamboredon, Jean-Claude; Passeron, Jean Claude; Krais, Beate (1991), The Craft of Sociology: Epistemological Preliminaries, Berlin; New York: Walter de Gruyter.
Bourdieu, Pierre; Eagleton, Terry (1992), “In Conversation: Doxa and Common Life”, New Left Review 191 (1): 111–121.
Bourdieu, Pierre; Passeron, Jean Claude (1990), Reproduction in Education, Society, and Culture, London: SAGE.
Bourdieu, Pierre; Schultheis, Franz; Pfeuffer, Andreas; Susen, Simon (2012), “With Weber Against Weber: In Conversation With Pierre Bourdieu”, in Simon Susen, Bryan Turner (eds.), The Legacy of Pierre Bourdieu, London: Anthem Press, pp. 111–124.
Bourdieu, Pierre; Wacquant, Loïc (1994), An Invitation to Reflexive Sociology, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Burr, Vivien (2015), Social Constructionism (3rd ed), New York: Routledge.
Calhoun, Craig (1996), “A Different Poststructuralism”, Contemporary Sociology 25 (3): 302–305.
Collin, Finn (1997), Social Reality, London: Routledge.
Crossley, Nick (2001), “The Phenomenological Habitus and its Construction”, Theory and Society 30 (1): 81–120.
Detel, Wolfgang (2001), “Social Constructivism”, in Neil J. Smelser, Paul B. Baltes (eds.), International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences, Amsterdam; New York: Elsevier, pp. 14264–14267.
Dreher, Jochen (2016), “The Social Construction of Power: Reflections Beyond Berger/Luckmann and Bourdieu”, Cultural Sociology 10 (1): 53–68.
—. (2019), “Oblivion of Power? The Social Construction of Reality and the (Counter-) Critique of Pierre Bourdieu”, in Michaela Pfadenhauer, Hubert Knoblauch (eds.), Social Constructivism as Paradigm? The Legacy of The Social Construction of Reality, New York: Routledge, pp. 235–250.
Dreher, Jochen; Göttlich, Andreas (2016), “Structures of a Life-Work: A Reconstruction of the Oeuvre of Thomas Luckmann”, Human Studies 39 (1): 27–49.
Eberle, Thomas S. (2019), “Variations of Constructivism”, in Michaela Pfadenhauer, Hubert Knoblauch (eds.), Social Constructivism as Paradigm? The Legacy of The Social Construction of Reality, New York: Routledge, pp. 131–151.
Elder-Vass, Dave (2012), The Reality of Social Construction, Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press.
Endress, Martin (2005), “Reflexivity, Reality, and Relationality. The Inadequacy of Bourdieu’s Critique of the Phenomenological Tradition in Sociology”, in Martin Endress, George Psathas, Hisashi Nasu (eds.), Explorations of the Life-World, Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, pp. 51–74.
—. (2019), “The Theoretical Claims of The Social Construction of Reality”, in Michaela Pfadenhauer, Hubert Knoblauch (eds.), Social Constructivism as Paradigm? The Legacy of The Social Construction of Reality, New York: Routledge, pp. 45–64.
Eribon, Didier (1991), Michel Foucault, Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.
Flick, Uwe (2004), “Constructivism”, in Uwe Flick, Ernst von Kardorff, Ines Steinke (eds.), A Companion to Qualitative Research, London: SAGE, pp. 88–94.
Frère, Bruno (2012), “Bourdieu’s Sociological Fiction: A Phenomenological Reading of Habitus”, in Simon Susen; Bryan Turner (eds.), The Legacy of Pierre Bourdieu, London: Anthem Press, pp. 247–270.
Gergen, Kenneth J. (1999), An Invitation to Social Construction, London: Thousand Oaks, SAGE.
Giddens, Anthony (1976), New Rules of Sociological Method: a Positive Critique of Interpretative Sociologies, London: Hutchinson.
Hacking, Ian (1999), The Social Construction of what?, Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.
Hitzler, Ronald; Reichertz, Jo; Schröer, Norbert (eds.) (2017), Hermeneutische Wissenssoziologie: Standpunkte zur Theorie der Interpretation. Köln: Halem.
Hjelm, Titus (2014), Social Constructionisms: Approaches to the Study of the Human World, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Jenkins, Richard (2007), Pierre Bourdieu, London: Routledge.
Jovanović, Miloš (2019), „Lukmanova teorija ličnog identiteta“, Glasnik Etnografskog instituta 67 (1): 105–119.
Keller, Reiner; Knoblauch, Hubert; Reichertz, Jo (hrsg.) (2013), Kommunikativer Konstruktivismus: theoretische und empirische Arbeiten zu einem neuen wissenssoziologischen Ansatz, Wiesbaden: Springer VS.
Knoblauch, Hubert (2003), „Habitus und Habitualisierung: zur Komplementarität von Bourdieu mit dem Sozialkonstruktivismus“, in Boike Rehbein, Gernot Saalmann, Hermann Schwengel (eds.), Pierre Bourdieus Theorie des Sozialen: Probleme und Perspektiven, Konstanz: UVK Verl.-Ges, pp. 187–201.
—. (2011), “Relativism, Meaning and the New Sociology of Knowledge”, in Richard Schantz, Markus Seidel (eds.), The Problem of Relativism in the Sociology of (Scientific) Knowledge, Frankfurt: Ontos, pp. 131–156.
Knoblauch, Hubert; Wilke, René (2016), “The Common Denominator: The Reception and Impact of Berger and Luckmann’s The Social Construction of Reality”, Human Studies 39 (19): 51–69.
Lock, Andrew; Strong, Thomas (2010), Social Constructionism: Sources and Stirrings in Theory and Practice, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Loenhoff, Jens (2015), „Die Objektivität des Sozialen“, in Bernhard Pörksen (hrsg.), Schlüsselwerke des Konstruktivismus, Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, pp. 131–147.
Luckmann, Thomas (2001), “Berger and his Collaborator(s)”, in Linda Woodhead, Paul Heelas, David Martin (eds.), Peter Berger and the Study of Religion, London; New York: Routledge, pp. 17–25.
Meyer, Renate E. (2008), “New Sociology of Knowledge: Historical Legacy and Contributions to Current Debates in Institutional Research”, in Royston Greenwood, Christine Oliver, Roy Suddaby, Kerstin Sahlin (eds.), The SAGE Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism, London: SAGE, pp. 519–538.
Nietzsche, Friedrich (1968), The Will to Power, New York: Vintage.
Pfadenhauer, Michaela; Knoblauch, Hubert (eds.), (2019) Social Constructivism as Paradigm?: The Legacy of The Social Construction of Reality. New York: Routledge.
Ralón, Gonzalo; Ralón, Laureano (2013), “Interview with Howard S. Becker”, Figure/Ground, available at: http://figureground.org/interview-with-howard-s-becker/ (viewed 25 May, 2021).
Ritzer, George (2010), Contemporary Sociological Theory and its Classical Roots: the Basics (3rd ed), San Francisco: McGraw Hill Higher Education.
Robbins, Derek (2016), “Reading Bourdieu Phenomenologically”, in The Anthem Companion to Pierre Bourdieu, London: Anthem Press, pp. 19–48.
Schneider, Joseph W. (2005), “Social Constructionism”, in George Ritzer (ed.), Encyclopedia of Social Theory, Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE, pp. 724–729.
Schnettler, Bernt; Knoblauch, Hubert; Raab, Jürgen (2017), “The ‘New’ Sociology of Knowledge”, in Babette Babich (ed.), Hermeneutic Philosophies of Social Science, Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter, pp. 237–265.
Scott, John (ed.) (2014), A Dictionary of Sociology (4th ed), Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Spasić, Ivana (2019), „Društvena konstrukcija stvarnosti i konstrukcionizam: nesporazum koji to (možda) nije“, Glasnik Etnografskog instituta 67 (1): 15–32.
Steets, Silke (2016a), “Taking Berger and Luckmann to the Realm of Materiality: Architecture as a Social Construction”, Cultural Sociology 10 (1): 93–108.
—. (2016b), “What Makes People Tick? And What Makes a Society Tick? And is a Theory Useful for Understanding?: An Interview with Peter L. Berger”, Human Studies 39 (1): 7–25.
Swartz, David (1997), Culture & Power: the Sociology of Pierre Bourdieu, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Swartz, David L. (2005), “From Critical Sociology to Public Intellectual: Pierre Bourdieu & Politics”, in David L. Swartz, Vera L. Zolberg (eds.), After Bourdieu, Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 333–364.
Tairako, Tomonaga (2017), „Versachlichung and Verdinglichung: Basic Categories of Marx’s Theory of Reification and Their Logical Construction“, Hitotsubashi Journal of Social Studies 48 (1): 1–26.
Tiryakian, Edward A. (1966), “A Problem for the Sociology of Knowledge: the Mutual Unawareness of Émile Durkheim and Max Weber”, European Journal of Sociology 7 (2): 330–336.
Vandenberghe, Frédéric (2018), “Under the Sacred Canopy: Peter Berger (1929–2017)”, European Journal of Social Theory 21 (3): 407–415.
Wacquant, Loïc (1998), “Pierre Bourdieu”, in Rob Stones (ed.), Key Sociological Thinkers, London: Macmillan Education UK, pp. 215–229.
Weinberg, Darin (2014), Contemporary Social Constructionism: Key Themes, Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Articles published in Philosophy and Society are open-access in accordance with the CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 License.